首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Income inequality in the United States remained relatively stable for a period of nearly forty years. Beginning in the 1970’s, h
Income inequality in the United States remained relatively stable for a period of nearly forty years. Beginning in the 1970’s, h
admin
2005-11-28
59
问题
Income inequality in the United States remained relatively stable for a period of nearly forty years. Beginning in the 1970’s, however, this period of stability ended, as the first signs of widening income inequality became apparent. Over the course of the 1970’s and 1980’s, an increasingly clear trend toward greater income inequality emerged. By the end of the 1980’s, the top 20 percent of workers were receiving the largest share of income ever recorded by government figures, and the bottom three fifths were receiving the lowest shares ever recorded. This trend has continued into the 1990’s and currently shows no signs of decline. When the indicators of growing inequality were first observed in the 1970’s, some researchers argued that the effects were merely temporary artifacts of short-term labor market disturbances. The new occupational structure appears to be one with an increase of well-paid technical, scientific and professional jobs at the top, a sliding middle class, and a growing poorly-paid service and retail jobs at the bottom. Several important labor-force changes appeared to be contributing to the shifting occupational structure.
As occupational reconstructing and growing income inequality have become increasingly evident, a heated debate as to the causes and magnitude of these changes arose. Two dominant bodies of thought emerged around the issue: the job-skill mismatch thesis and the polarization thesis. Mismatch theorists argue that there is an increasing distance between the high skill requirements of post-industrial jobs and the inadequate training and mediocre qualifications of workers. They see the post-industrial economy leaving behind unskilled workers, especially women and minorities. For the mismatch theorist, the trend toward greater inequality is temporary arid will dissipate once the supply of workers acquires the skills demanded by a post-industrial economy. And they predict that the workers will experience an upgrading in their wages over the long run. Polarization theorists, on the other hand, believe that the rise in inequality is permanent, a result of the shift to a service-based economy. This vision of the post-industrial economy is characteristically polarized. The problem according to these theorists, is the type of jobs being generated in the new economy, not worker attributes. Because they believe the causes are structural and permanent, polarization theorists would deny the efficacy of public policies designed to educate and train unskilled workers. They predict a long-term continuation of the trend towards increasing income inequality.
Studies show that the long-run increase in income inequality is also related to changes in the Nation’s labor market and its household composition. The wage distribution has become considerably more unequal with more highly skilled, trained and educated workers at the top experiencing real wage gains and those at the bottom real wage losses. One factor is the shift in employment from those goods-producing industries that have disproportionately provided high-wage opportunities for low-skilled workers, towards services that disproportionately employ college graduates, and towards low-wage sectors such as retail trade. But within industry, shifts in labor demand away from less-educated workers are perhaps a more important explanation of eroding wages than the shift out of manufacturing.
Also cited as putting downward pressure on the wages of less-educated workers are intensifying global competition and immigration, the decline of the proportion of workers belonging to unions, the decline in the real value of the minimum wage, the increasing need for computer skills, and the increasing use of temporary workers.
According to Paragraph 2, which of the following statements is NOT true?
选项
A、Both mismatch theorists and polarization theorists think that greater inequality will remain.
B、Mismatch theorists and polarization theorists have opposite views regarding the post-industrial economy.
C、Polarization theorists do not think it useful to train the workers.
D、Both groups of theorists try to explain the causes of income inequality.
答案
A
解析
本题可参照第二段中的“For the mismatch theorist,the trend toward greater inequality is temporary arid will dissipate”,从中可知A项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FTIO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readthearticlebelowaboutmarketingsegmentation.Inmostofthelines(34-45),thereisoneextraword.Iteitherisgram
Readthearticlebelowaboutprofessionalheadhunters.Choosethebestsentencefromtheoppositepagetofilleachoftheg
Readthearticlebelowaboutthedifferencesbetweenchiefexecutivesandentrepreneurs.Choosethebestsentencefromtheo
Readthetextbelowaboutacompany’sapproachtosocialresponsibility.Inmostofthelines(34-45),thereisoneextrawor
BethHatfieldlostherjobbecausethecompanysheworkedforBethfinancedJumpstartby
Youwillhearaconversationthroughaphone.Foreachquestion(23-30),markoneletter(A,BorC)forthecorrectanswer.After
•ReadtheminutesbelowfromaHealthandSafetycommitteemeeting.•ChoosethecorrectwordtofilleachgapfromA,BorCon
•ReadtheminutesbelowfromaHealthandSafetycommitteemeeting.•ChoosethecorrectwordtofilleachgapfromA,BorCon
•Readthefollowingpassagewhichadvisescandidateshowtoanswerdifficultinterviewquestions.•Arethesentences16-22"Ri
Theprevailingwindisthewinddirectionmostoftenobservedduringagiventimeperiod.Windspeedistherateatwhichtheai
随机试题
试述应从哪四大方面评估重大错报风险。
男,40岁,不慎被烧伤。Ⅱ°烧伤面积达45%。入院后应采用
下列哪项不可能出现在坏死性涎腺化生
关于口腔颌面部解剖特点,下列哪项是错误的
患者,女,38岁,干部。间断四肢关节肿痛7个月,加重2周入院。患者7个月前无明显诱因出现左手无名指和右手示指近端指间关节肿胀、疼痛,伴晨僵,时间约10分钟,实验检查:血沉65mm/h,RF(+)。关节X线检查;双手骨骨密度减低。最可能的诊断是
物权的效力主要表现在()。
()安全装置的作用,是在操作到危险点之前,自动使机器停止或反向运动。
H公司2013年4月初库存原材料的计划成本为500万元,“材料成本差异”账户的借方余额为50万元,4月5日发出委托加工原材料一批,计划成本80万元;4月10日生产领用原材料一批,计划成本340万元;4月25日购入原材料一批,实际成本为310万元,计划成本为
某企业经批准处理部分财产损溢:现金长款100元、存货损失2300元,其中1000元为大水淹毁,股权投资损失4600元,存在证券公司的20000元因证券公司破产不能收回。该企业上述损失影响的营业利润为()元。
OpinionpollsrepeatedlytellusthattheonlythingAmericansworryaboutmorethantheenvironmentistheirhealth.Thisis【C1
最新回复
(
0
)