首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Google’ s Plan for World’ s Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy? A) In recent years, teams of workers di
Google’ s Plan for World’ s Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy? A) In recent years, teams of workers di
admin
2020-06-08
54
问题
Google’ s Plan for World’ s Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or
Act of Piracy?
A) In recent years, teams of workers dispatched by Google have been working hard to make digital copies of books. So far, Google has scanned more than 10 million titles from libraries in America and Europe—including half a million volumes held by the Bodleian in Oxford. The exact method it uses is unclear; the company does not allow outsiders to observe the process.
B) Why is Google undertaking such a venture? Why is it even interested in all those out-of-print library books, most of which have been gathering dust on forgotten shelves for decades? The company claims its motives are essentially public-spirited. Its overall mission, after all, is to "organize the world’s information", so it would be odd if that information did not include books.
C) The company likes to present itself as having lofty aspirations. "This really isn’t about making money. We are doing this for the good of society." As Santiago de la Mora, head of Google Books for Europe, puts it: "By making it possible to search the millions of books that exist today, we hope to expand the frontiers of human knowledge."
D) Dan Clancy, the chief architect of Google Books, does seem genuine in his conviction that this is primarily a philanthropic (慈善的) exercise. "Google’ s core business is search and find, so obviously what helps improve Google’ s search engine is good for Google," he says. "But we have never built a spreadsheet (电子数据表) outlining the financial benefits of this, and I have never had to justify the amount I am spending to the company’ s founders."
E) It is easy, talking to Clancy and his colleagues, to be swept along by their missionary passion. But Google’s book-scanning project is proving controversial. Several opponents have recently emerged, ranging from rival tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon to small bodies representing authors and publishers across the world. In broad terms, these opponents have levelled two sets of criticisms at Google.
F) First, they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving the world’ s books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company. In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books, Robert Darnton, the head of Harvard University’s library, argued that because such books are a common resource—the possession of us all—only public, not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them. The second related criticism is that Google’s scanning of books is actually illegal. This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in (陷入) a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Charles Dickens’ Bleak House look straightforward.
G) At its centre, however, is one simple issue: that of copyright. The inconvenient fact about most books, to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention, is that they are protected by copyright. Copyright laws differ from country to country, but in general protection extends for the duration of an author’s life and for a substantial period afterwards, thus allowing the author’s heirs to benefit. (In Britain and America, this post-death period is 70 years.) This means, of course, that almost all of the books published in the 20th century are still under copyright—and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined. Of the roughly 40 million books in US libraries, for example, an estimated 32 million are in copyright. Of these, some 27 million are out of print.
H) Outside the US, Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the "public domain" (works such as the Bodleian’s first edition of Middlemarch, which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search). But, within the US, the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works. In its defence, Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are in copyright—arguing that such displays are "fair use". But critics allege that by making electronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holders, Google has committed piracy.
I) "The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied only once authors have expressly given their permission," says Piers Blofeld, of the Sheil Land literary agency in London. "Google has reversed this—it has simply copied all these works without bothering to ask."
J) In 2005, the Authors Guild of America, together with a group of US publishers, launched a class action suit (集团诉讼) against Google that, after more than two years of negotiation, ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached an out-of-court settlement. The full details are complicated—the text alone runs to 385 pages—and trying to summarize it is no easy task. "Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible,"says Blofeld, one of the settlement’s most vocal British critics.
K) Broadly, the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached (including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works). In exchange for this, the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future. The settlement hands Google the power—but only with the agreement of individual rights holders—to exploit its database of out-of-print books. It can include them in subscription deals sold to libraries or sell them individually under a consumer license. It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlement’s most controversial aspect.
L) Critics point out that, by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database, the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company’s role from provider of information to seller. "Google’ s business model has always been to provide information for free, and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates," points out James Grimmelmann, associate professor at New York Law School. Now, he says, because of the settlement’s provisions, Google could become a significant force in bookselling.
M) Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on "orphan" works, where there is no known copyright holder—these make up an estimated 5-10% of the books Google has scanned. Under the settlement, when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work, commercial control automatically reverts to Google. Google will be able to display up to 20% of orphan works for free, include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer license.
N) It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted (执行)—it is the subject of a fairness hearing in the US courts. But if it is enacted, Google will in effect be off the hook as far as copyright violations in the US are concerned. Many people are seriously concerned by this—and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world.
O) No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained by scanning the world’ s library books, and the truth, as Gleick, an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild, points out, is that the company probably doesn’t even know itself. But what is certain is that, in some way or other, Google’s entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come.
Google claims its plan for the world’s biggest online library is to serve the interest of the general public.
选项
答案
B
解析
此句意为“谷歌计划筹建世界最大的在线图书馆是为公众谋福利”这是B段The company claims its motives are essentially public-spirited.(该公司宣称它的主要动机在于激励大众。)的同义转述。因此,正确答案是B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FhP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Earthquakesmayhappenanywhereatanytime.B、Thepreciseplaceandtimeofanearthquake.C、Whetherthemajorityofpeoplekn
A、Aneffectivetooltohelpformwomen’sfriendship.B、Awaytounderstandandappreciatefriends.C、Anaccessthatawomancan
A、Inacrowdedclassroom.B、Inanemptyroom.C、Inabusystreetcorner.D、Inashoppingcentre.B推断题。根据Whatanice,quietspota
Withitsrecession-friendlycoffeeprices,plentifultablesandavailablebathrooms,McDonald’srestaurantsalloverthecountr
Withitsrecession-friendlycoffeeprices,plentifultablesandavailablebathrooms,McDonald’srestaurantsalloverthecountr
A)TheSupremeCourtunambiguouslyruledWednesdaythatprivacyrightsarenotsacrificedto21stcenturytechnology,sayinguna
A、Theneedtoexercisethememory.B、Howthebraindiffersfromotherbodytissues.C、Theunconsciouslearningofaphysicalact
SouthAfricahas11officiallanguages.Ifyouwanttosayhello,it’s"sawubona"inZulu,and"hallo"inAfrikaans.Now,South
BernardBailynhasrecentlyreinterpretedtheearlyhistoryoftheUnitedStatesbyapplyingnewsocialresearchfindingsonthe
ItisgettinghardertogoanywherewithoutsteppingonapieceofLego-relatedhype.TheLegoMovieisnumbertwoattheAmeric
随机试题
调拨价格
“水火既济”是指哪两脏的关系
患者男,55岁。进行床一轮椅转移评定,患者能自己站起,需要较小的帮助转移到轮椅,可以独立完成由坐到站的转换,站立时推、拉患者不能保持平衡。患者此项的Bathel评分为
计算机病毒是一种程序,通常它隐藏在()中。
根据《证券公司为期货公司提供中间介绍业务试行办法》的规定,证券公司不得()。
甲公司属于建筑防水材料行业,是一家集研发、生产、销售、技术咨询和施工服务为一体的专业化建筑防水系统供应商。建筑防水材料是建筑功能材料的重要组成部分,随着国家基础设施建设力度的加大和城镇化速度的加快,其应用领域和市场容量将持续扩大。产业政策方面,国
王老师严厉责罚了小明后发现错不在小明,但因为小明是后进生,王老师就不打算道歉。对此。你怎么看?
制定教学计划首先考虑的问题是()。
公共领域的问题从来都不是科学的问题、统计数字的问题,而是主观认识的问题、意见的问题、想象的问题。在社会领域,民众的主观感觉才是最主要的客观事实。因此,在讨论公共政策问题的时候,看似准确的数字,其实并不像官员、专家们想象的那样重要。相反,如果一个国家的民众感
老王对老李说:“除非你在今天之内按照合同要求支付货款,否则我们法庭上见。”以下哪项判断的含义与上述判断不同?()
最新回复
(
0
)