首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels", as
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels", as
admin
2019-11-02
49
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels", as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17.5k dead women a year". That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was a good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit, " cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12-1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88, 000 a year, though few patients live that long.) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging", and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life".
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $10, 000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17, 500 dead women (from a right-wing blog) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort, " Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin". Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average, " biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions." But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong". "That some women did live longer on Avastin, " Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy."
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm, " says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public." Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of Avastin?
选项
A、It can help malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them.
B、It can extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer.
C、It can extend the lives of patients with breast cancer.
D、It can help patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
答案
C
解析
下列哪项不是阿瓦斯丁的益处?首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、B和D分别可从第三段和第四段中得出均为正确的答案,而阿瓦斯丁不能延长乳腺癌病人的生命。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FjbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ApprenticeshipshavelongbeenpopularinEurope,butworkforce-orientedhighschooltrainingisnearlyascommonin【M1】______U
Whilemanynationshaveagingpopulations,Japan’sdemographiccrisisistrulydire,withforecastsshowingthat40percentof
Poetrycanbecomparedtopainting.Whenyoulookataworkofart,youfirstseeitforwhatitis—adepictionofaperson,an
Forconvenienceitiscommontospeakofplantsas"herbs,""shrubs,"and"trees,"butitisreallynosharpdistinctionsamong
A、Indifference.B、Criticism.C、Hatred.D、Conservatism.B根据句(9)可知,自从快餐出现以来就饱受人们的诟病。因此答案为[B]。
A、Makingsuitabledevelopmentgoals.B、GettinganMBAdiploma.C、Findingajobineducation.D、Learningaforeignlanguage.B根据句
ChineseAmericansI.EarlyimmigrationA.thefirstgroupofChineseimmigrants—cameto【T1】______【T1】______—becamethe【T2】__
Languagepervadessociallife.Itistheprincipalvehicleforthetransmissionofculturalknowledge,andtheprimarymeansby
A、Toinitiatenewtopics.B、Tosupporttheinterview.C、Tointroducenewpolicies.D、Toexplainsomestatistics.A本题询问采访者在访谈中的作用
诸位毕业同学:你们现在要离开母校了,我没有什么礼物送你们,只好送你们一句话罢。这一句话是:“不要抛弃学问。”以前的功课也许有一大部分是为了这张毕业文凭,不得已而做的,从今以后,你们可以依自己的心愿去自由研究了。趁现在年富力强的时候,努力做一种专门
随机试题
社会主义初级阶段基本路线最主要的内容是
以下与磺胺类药物有交叉过敏反应的非甾体抗炎药是
薤白的功效是()
现代医学模式为生物一心理一社会医学模式。()
招标师职业继续教育的主要作用是()。
(2018年)乙公司为甲公司的全资子公司,且甲公司无其他子公司。乙公司2017年实现净利润500万元,提取盈余公积50万元。宣告分配现金股利150万元,2017年甲公司个别利润表中确认投资收益480万元。不考虑其他因素,2017年甲公司合并利润表中“投资收
论述人体在运动时,机体工作能力逐步提高的原因,并根据“极点”和“第二次呼吸”产生机制,谈谈你在运动实践中如何对待之。
社会主义初级阶段按生产要素分配有多种不同的分配形式,就其内容不同可以分为三种类型。下列不属于劳动以外的生产要素所有者参与分配的是
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须都保存在考生文件夹下。公司将于今年举办“创新产品展示说明会”,市场部助理小王需要将会议邀请函制作完成,并寄送给相关的客户。现在,请
[A]excessive[I]minimum[B]coexisted[J]plausibly[C]manipulation[K]subsidy[D]inaugurate[L]intervenes[E]emergenc
最新回复
(
0
)