In the eighteenth century, Japan’s feudal overlords, from the shogun to the humblest samurai, found themselves under financial s

admin2020-08-17  25

问题     In the eighteenth century, Japan’s feudal overlords, from the shogun to the humblest samurai, found themselves under financial stress. In part, this stress can be attributed to the overlords’ failure to adjust to a rapidly expanding economy, but the stress was also due to factors beyond the overlords’ control. Concentration of the samurai in castle-towns had acted as a stimulus to trade. Commercial efficiency, in turn, had put temptations in the way of buyers. Since most samurai had been reduced to idleness by years of peace, encouraged to engage in scholarship and martial exercises or to perform administrative tasks that took little time, it is not surprising that their tastes and habits grew expensive. Overlords’ income, despite the increase in rice production among their tenant farmers, failed to keep pace with their expenses. Although shortfalls in overlords’ income resulted almost as much from laxity among their tax collectors (the nearly inevitable outcome of hereditary office-holding) as from their higher standards of living, a misfortune like a fire or flood, bringing an increase in expenses or a drop in revenue, could put a domain in debt to the city rice-brokers who handled its finances. Once in debt, neither the individual samurai nor the shogun himself found it easy to recover.
    It was difficult for individual samurai overlords to increase their income because the amount of rice that farmers could be made to pay in taxes was not unlimited, and since the income of Japan’s central government consisted in part of taxes collected by the shogun from his huge domain, the government too was constrained. Therefore, the Tokugawa shoguns began to look to other sources for revenue. Cash profits from government-owned mines were already on the decline because the most easily worked deposits of silver and gold had been exhausted, although debasement of the coinage had compensated for the loss. Opening up new farmland was a possibility, but most of what was suitable had already been exploited and further reclamation was technically unfeasible. Direct taxation of the samurai themselves would be politically dangerous. This left the shoguns only commerce as a potential source of government income.
    Most of the country’s wealth, or so it seemed, was finding its way into the hands of city merchants. It appeared reasonable that they should contribute part of that revenue to ease the shogun’s burden of financing the state. A means of obtaining such revenue was soon found by levying forced loans, known as goyo-kin; although these were not taxes in the strict sense, since they were irregular in timing and arbitrary in amount, they were high in yield. Unfortunately, they pushed up prices. Thus, regrettably, the Tokugawa shogunsl search for solvency for the government made it increasingly difficult for individual Japanese who lived on fixed stipends to make ends meet.
The passage implies that which of the following was the primary reason why the Tokugawa shoguns turned to city merchants for help in financing the state?

选项 A、A series of costly wars had depleted the national treasury.
B、Most of the country’s wealth appeared to be in city merchants’ hands.
C、Japan had suffered a series of economic reversals due to natural disasters such as floods.
D、The merchants were already heavily indebted to the shoguns.

答案B

解析 事实细节题。最后一段前两句指出,国家的大部分财富应该是在城市商人的手中,他们应该贡献部分收入以减轻幕府为国家筹集资金的负担。B项表述符合文义,故为答案。第一段第五句提到,多年的和平让大多数武士赋闲无事,A项表述错误,故排除;文中并未提到日本因洪水等自然灾害而导致经济倒退,故排除C项;第三段第三句提到,goyo-kin是一种通过征收强制性贷款来让幕府获得城市商人部分收入的方法,即欠债的是幕府,故排除D项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/G8ra777K
0

最新回复(0)