首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Affirmative action may not be the most divisive issue on the ballot, but it remains an unending source of conflict and debate a
Affirmative action may not be the most divisive issue on the ballot, but it remains an unending source of conflict and debate a
admin
2011-02-11
84
问题
Affirmative action may not be the most divisive issue on the ballot, but it remains an unending source of conflict and debate at least in Michigan, whose citizens are pondering a proposal that would ban affirmative action in the public sector. No one knows whether other states will follow Michigan’s lead, but partisans on both sides see the vote as crucial--a decision that could either help or hinder a movement aimed at ending "preferential treatment" programs once and for all.
Ward Connerly has no doubts about the outcome. "There may be some ups and downs...with regard to affirmative action, but it’s ending, "says Connerly, the main mover behind the Michigan proposal, who pushed almost identical propositions to passage in California 10 years ago and in Washington state two years later. His adversaries are equally passionate. "I just want to shout from the rooftops, ’This isn’t good for America’, "says Mary Sue Coleman, president of the University of Michigan. She sees no need for Michigan to adopt the measure. "We have a living experiment in California, and it has failed, ’says Coleman.
Wade Henderson, executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, sees something deeply symbolic in the battle. Michigan, in his eyes, is where resegregation began--with a 1974 U. S. Supreme Court decision that tossed out a plan to bus Detroit children to the suburbs. Henderson sees that decision as a prelude to the hypersegregation that now defines much of Michigan. The Supreme Court is currently considering two new cases that could lead to another ruling on how far public school systems can go in their quest to maintain racial balance.
All of which raises a question: why are we still wrestling with this stuff? Why, more than a quarter of a century after the high court ruled race had a legitimate place in university admissions decisions, are we still fighting over whether race should play a role?
One answer is that the very idea of affirmative action--that is, systematically treating members of various groups differently in the pursuit of diversity or social justice--strikes some people as downright immoral. For to believe in affirmative action is to believe in a concept of equality turned upside down. It is to believe that "to treat some persons equally, we must treat them differently, " as the idea was expressed by U. S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun.
That argument has never been an easy sell, even when made passionately by President Lyndon B. Johnson during an era in which prejudice was thicker than L. A. smog. Now the argument is infinitely more difficult to make. Even those generally supportive of affirmative action don’t like the connotations it sometimes carries. "No one wants preferential treatment, including African-Americans, "observed Ed Sarpolis, vice president of EPIC-MRA, a Michigan polling firm.
In 2003, the Supreme Court upheld the University of Michigan’s right to use race in the pursuit of "diversity," even as it condemned the way the undergraduate school had chosen to do so. The decision left Jennifer Gratz, the named plaintiff, fuming. "I called Ward Connerly... and I said, ’We need to do something about this’, " recalled Gratz, an animated former cheerleader. They decided that if the Supreme Court wouldn’t give them what they wanted, they would take their case--and their proposition--directly to the people.
Californians disagree about the impact of Connerly’s proposition on their state. But despite some exceedingly grim predictions, the sky did not fall in. Most people went about their lives much as they always had.
In a sane world, the battle in Michigan, and indeed the battle over affirmative action writ large, would offer an opportunity to seriously engage a question the enemies and defenders of affirmative action claim to care about: how do you go about creating a society where all people--not just the lucky few--have the opportunities they deserve? It is a question much broader than the debate over affirmative action. But until we begin to move toward an answer, the debate over affirmative action will continue--even if it is something of a sideshow to what should be the main event.
Which of the following is Wade Henderson’s attitude towards Michigan’s movement?
选项
A、Approval.
B、Disapproval.
C、Objective.
D、Difficult to tell.
答案
D
解析
态度题。由题干中的Wade Henderson定位至第三段。首句指出:Wade Henderson…sees something deeply symbolic in the battle。接着具体说明该事件的深层含义:他认为密歇根州是种族主义重新抬头的领头羊。但是作者并未说明或暗示他对于密歇根州要投票决定是否终止大学入学中的“优先待遇”是何态度,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GAeO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、thefiercerivalryofthecurrentratings"sweep"B、TVdramas’growingtendencytotransformnewsintofictionC、writers’incr
Britain’sSystemofEducationTheBritishCommonwealthincludesaquarteroftheworld’spopulationinone-sixthoftheworld
Theearliestcontroversiesabouttherelationshipbetweenphotographyandartcenteredonwhetherphotograph’sfidelitytoappea
中国是人类文明最早的发源地之一,中华文明也是世界上最古老的文明之一。从文字,青铜器等在中国出现并被使用开始,古老的中华大地便迎来了古代文明的晨曦。造纸术、火药、印刷术、指南针等发明,是中华民族对世界文明的突出贡献。孔子、老子等伟大思想家在两千多年前创立的哲
A、FishermenB、ScientistsC、TouristsD、SuffersD
DonJuaniswrittenby
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandinAs.ia,dinosaurfossilsarenowbeingdiscoveredonallsevenco
A、Tospendhisholidays.B、Toparticipateinabusinessnegotiation.C、TomeethisAustralianfriendthere.D、ToattractSriLan
A、Positive.B、Negative.C、Neutral.D、Indifferent.B
A、brush.B、thread.C、present.D、scissor.D
随机试题
原料经脱水干制后,其内部含有许多毛细血管,当与水接触时,由于浸润作用使水分渗入原料内部,原料因吸水而膨胀。()
下列关于血管紧张素Ⅱ生理作用的描述,错误的是
肝硬化合并上消化道出血最主要的原因是
房地产经纪行业管理的目的在于规范房地产经纪活动,并协调房地产经纪活动中所涉及的各类当事人,包括()之间的关系。
()属于潜在致癌物。
如图2,该建筑是为纪念战争胜利而建造的()。
下列关于自然常识的描述,正确的是:
①据调查,失读症在西方人中比较多见,而在中国人中极少发现②让患者先学习汉字,再将语言材料用英文和汉字分两边认读,丧失的英文阅读能力竟然也得到了部分恢复③失读症指人因大脑局部受到损伤而丧失文字阅读能力④根据汉字认知的特点,西方发明了一种奇特的失读症治疗
普通话有()个浊辅音。
下面不属于软件需求规格说明书内容的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)