首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
59
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 4 about the power of the curse of the Pharaoh’s tomb?
选项
A、It is supported by science.
B、It is a rumor denied by scientific fact.
C、It is still a myth.
D、It does punish people who disturb the tomb.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:关于第四段所提到的诅咒的力量,可以作出以下哪一项推论?根据本段,Carter团队中的一些人的意外死亡似乎应验了这一诅咒,但是Carter却在多年以后平静地去世。所以,这证明了谣言并不正确,已经被事实所否定,因此选B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GFyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
DothefollowingstatementsagreewiththeinformationgiveninReadingPassage1?Inboxes10-13onyouranswersheet,writeTR
Choosethecorrectletter,A,B,CorD.Writeyouranswersinboxes37-40onyouranswersheet.Whowerethelargestgrouptor
ChooseTHREElettersfromA-G.Writeyouranswerinboxes24-26onyouranswersheet.WhichTHREEofthefollowingstatementsar
TheConceptofChildhoodinWesternCountriesThehistoryofchildhoodhasbeenaheatedtopicinsocialhistorysincetheh
Theprofessorsaysthatsuperhighways______.Thestudentthinkspeople______.
CompletethenotesinNOMORETHANTHREEWORDS.ThesubjectstakenInthefirstsemesterinthiscoursearepsychology,sociolog
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Inthehome,oneofthemostimportantusesofwa
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?Itcanbeinferredfromparagraph3thatchipmunksdonotaidinthedispersalofoaktr
Whatisthemainideaofthepassage?Thepassagesuggeststhatoxygenremainedintheatmospherebecause______.
Whycan’tthestudentstudyabroadinthefallsemester?
随机试题
《饮马长城窟行.青青河畔草》:青青河畔草,_________。
男性,21岁,6周前踢足球时扭伤左膝,疼痛至今未愈,行走时常有弹响和交锁以下哪~项是最佳的辅助检查
关于行政诉讼中的证据保全申请,下列选项正确的是()。
顾某与侯某系同事,因竞争同一职位而彼此怨恨,侯某多次在单位散布顾某有不正当男女关系的谣言。顾某知情后,与侯某发生争吵,争吵过程中将侯某打成轻伤。侯某以故意伤害罪向人民法院提起诉讼,要求追究顾某的刑事责任,并且提起附带民事诉讼,要求赔偿经济损失。下列说法中,
某机电安装工程公司承接某综合性设施的通风空调安装工程,在施工准备阶段,该机电安装工程公司制定了施工方法和施工工艺,在制定过程中兼顾了进度控制、质量控制、成本控制三大目标,使得各工序施工活动的质量得到了有效控制。同时该机电安装工程公司对施工环境也制定了相应的
根据《中华人民共和国建筑法》,工程监理人员发现工程设计不符合建筑工程质量标准或者合同约定的质量要求的,应当()。
我国所有企事业单位在进行会计核算时,都必须统一采用()。
劳动者以用人单位()为证据直接向人民法院起诉,诉讼请求不涉及劳动关系其他争议的,可按照普通民事纠纷受理。
简述教师的权利。
Thecompanyismostworriedabouthow______.Theinformationwas______.
最新回复
(
0
)