首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
69
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Massmediaismediathatisintendedforalargeaudience.Itmaytaketheformofbroadcastmedia,asincaseoftelevisionan
Theabilitytocommunicateistheprimaryfactorthatdistinguisheshumanbeingsfromanimals.Anditistheabilitytocommunic
Ifthere’sasensitiveinvestigationintotheflawsofcrimefighters,themanthefedsoftencallintodothejobisWilliamH
A、Theauthor.B、Thepublicationdate.C、Thepagenumberofthebook.D、Thetitleofthebook.C管理员表示:ThedetailsI’llneedaret
A、Imposeandanswerquestionsduringclasstime.B、DomuchmorehomeworkthanBritishstudents.C、Betalkativeindiscussionses
ItisreportedthatChineselawmakersareconsideringregulationstopromotereadingamongthepublic.Thenewshascausedconce
A、Puttinghisideasacrosstoothers.B、Solvingthornyproblems.C、Explainingsolutionstoothers.D、Planningaheadofcolleague
ThisorganizationbroughtWesternartiststogetherinthehopeofmakingmoreofanimpactontheartcommunity______anyofth
TheMainLibraryhasfivefloorsopentothepublic. FOURTHFLOOR:SocialSciences&History.300-399,650-
Havesomecoffee,______?
随机试题
对蒸发压力进行控制,第一可以控制冷藏库库温,第二可以使蒸发器具有不同的()。
Itwassaidthatthenewcar______totheinstituteasagiftbyabusinessman.
用凝胶过滤层析(交联葡聚糖凝胶)柱分离蛋白质时,下列哪项是正确的?
患者男,60岁。因“声音嘶哑半个月余伴咽痛”就诊,查体发现颈部可及2cm×4cm大小肿大淋巴结,颈部MRI提示:①右侧梨状窝新生物,侵及右侧声带,环状软骨部分受侵;②双侧颈部多个肿大淋巴结,最大径<6cm。下一步治疗方案选择,你认为不合理的是
医师进行实验性临床医疗,应当
地价整体状况分析和判断是土地估价师要具备的基本能力。假定甲城镇和乙城镇相邻且规模相当,如果甲的GDP增长率为9%,乙为7%,甲的城市建设用地面积增长率为7%,乙为5%。根据这一情况分析,以下判断中()正确。
理财师应该提醒家长在子女出国留学规划决策时关注哪些问题?()
法律起源的一般规律有( )。
实体一联系模型可以形象地用E-R图表示。在E-R图中以何种图形表示实体类型?
A、Themanshouldstartrunningdaily.B、Shealsopreferstoexerciseintheafternoon.C、It’simportanttowarmupbeforeexerci
最新回复
(
0
)