首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
89
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theabilitytocommunicateistheprimaryfactorthatdistinguisheshumanbeingsfromanimals.Anditistheabilitytocommunic
HaveyouevernoticedacertainsimilarityinpublicparksandbackgardensinthecitiesoftheWest?Aubiquitouswoodlandmix
(1)"Britain’sbestexport,"IwastoldbytheheadoftheDepartmentofImmigrationinCanberra,"ispeople."Closeon100,000
Googlemaybevaluedatmorethan$185billionandboastmillionsofusers,butthatdoesn’tmeantheInternetgiantisanymatc
Countlessmedicalstudieshaveconcludedthatplayingtoomanyvideogamescanbeharmfultoone’shealth.Now,however,itturn
ManyparentshavetothinkhardaboutthegiftsthattheirchildrenshouldgiveteachersonTeachers’Day.Butshouldteachersa
It’snosecretthatscrollingthroughendlessimagesandannouncementsofengagements,vacations,newbabiesandjobpromoti
Thefollowingtwoexcerptsareaboutschooluniform,auniformthatiswornbystudentsprimarilyforaschoolorotherwiseeduc
Thefollowingaretwoexcerptsaboutlivestreaming.ReadthetwoexcerptscarefullyandwriteanarticleofNOLESSTHAN300WO
PassageThreeWhyisdaVinciregardedasoneofthetopartists?
随机试题
试述社会主义国家与资本主义国家内部职能的区别。
Wedon’thavebedsinthespacecraft,butwedohavesleepingbags.Duringtheday,whenweareworking,weleavethebagstied
急性阑尾炎最常见的病因是
结核性与癌性胸腔积液鉴别要点是
在实施审计程序过程中,注册会计师发现被审计单位财务经理贪污5万元。对该事项,注册会计师应当采取的措施有()。
阅读以下文字。完成下列问题。①:在党中央、国务院的坚强领导下,近年来困难群众基本生活保障制度不断健全、水平稳步提升。同时,也存在部分保障政策衔接不够、保障水平与群众需求相比存在一定差距等问题。为进一
如何理解真理的相对性?
使计算机病毒传播范围最广的媒介是()
例如:男:把这个材料复印5份,一会儿拿到会议室发给大家。女:好的。会议是下午三点吗?男:改了。三点半,推迟了半个小时。女:好,602会议室没变吧?男:对,没变。问:会议几点开始?A两点B3点C15:30√D18:00
Itseemstometherearetwoaspectstowomen.Thereisthedemureandthedauntless.Menhavelovedtodwell,infictionatlea
最新回复
(
0
)