首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
57
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
HaveyouevernoticedacertainsimilarityinpublicparksandbackgardensinthecitiesoftheWest?Aubiquitouswoodlandmix
PASSAGEFOURInParagraph6,thereisalinelike"China,whichhasalsoobjectedtothedigitalizationprojectoncopyrightgr
TheMessagesinDistanceI.Peoplefromdifferentcultures【T1】______differently【T1】______A.NorthAmericansstandabouttwof
Populationageingandtheresultingpressuresonexistingpensionsystemsconstitutesoneofthemostimportantchallengesmode
Unlikeanyothercreatureonthisplanet,humanscanlearnandunderstand,withouthavingexperienced.Theycanthinkthemselve
ThefollowingtwoexcerptsareaboutIceBucketChallenge,anactivityinitiatedtoraisemoneyandawarenessforthediseaseAL
Recentyearshaveseenanincreasingnumberofchildrenbecomingthevictimsofabuse.Fortunately,educationonsexsafetyisn
(1)Toooften,investorsfocusonfiguresthatsupposedlyofferinsightintoacompany’sperformancewithoutsheddinglightonho
Hefailedtocompletelyachievetheaim______bytheteacheratthebeginningoftheterm.
WhichofthefollowingadverbscanNOTbeusedtocomplete"______everybodycame"?
随机试题
在社会主义改造中,用和平赎买方法改造的对象是()
脱水药的特点是()
A.海藻玉壶汤B.普济消毒饮合丹栀逍遥散C.透脓散合仙方活命饮D.龙胆泻肝汤合芍药散E.知柏地黄汤合当归六黄汤治疗慢性甲状腺炎气滞痰凝证,应首选
在产品价格相差较小并趋于同质化的前提下,选择产品的非价格因素就显得尤为重要。保险产品的非价格因素不包括( )。
当发生()时,基金合同生效。
可以通过受训者与有经验的管理人员共同工作和管理人员对受训者的特别关注,从而拓展受训者的思维,增加他们的管理经验的方法是()
据统计,2016年共有来自205个国家和地区的442773名各类外国留学人员在31个省、自治区、直辖市的829所高等学校、科研院所和其他教学机构中学习,比2015年增加45138人。1.按洲别统计2.按国别排序前15名:韩国70540人,美国2383
①大观园正园门附近还有花厅(议事厅)和茶房②其中滴翠亭在潇湘馆附近,藕香榭在暖香坞寥风轩附近,芦雪庵与藕香榭相通③大观园中的建筑被一贯穿南北的中轴线分为东西两部分④这条轴线的东半区从南到北有怡红院、嘉荫堂等祭月赏月建筑群、佛寺道院建筑群(含栊翠庵)、
下列哪个选项是1954年《宪法》的制定主体()
关于水平滚动条,如下叙述中错误的是
最新回复
(
0
)