首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
97
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theabilitytocommunicateistheprimaryfactorthatdistinguisheshumanbeingsfromanimals.Anditistheabilitytocommunic
Lookingback,itwasnaivetoexpectWikipedia’sjoyridetolastforever.Sinceitsinceptionin2001,theuser-writtenonlinee
PASSAGETHREEWhatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsAmericanhealth-caresystem?
Manystudentstodaydisplayadisturbingwillingnesstochooseacademicinstitutions,fieldsofstudyandcareersinthebasis
InChina,thereisaspecialsocialmentalitycalled"resentmenttowardstherich",meaningthegeneralpublicis,toalessero
It’snosecretthatscrollingthroughendlessimagesandannouncementsofengagements,vacations,newbabiesandjobpromoti
(1)Afteralongdayattheoffice,manyofusfindourselvestakingoutourstressonfriends,children,orsignificantothers.
(1)Toooften,investorsfocusonfiguresthatsupposedlyofferinsightintoacompany’sperformancewithoutsheddinglightonho
A、Becauseitisanentirelytheoreticalcourse.B、Becauseitisbeneficialforemployment.C、Becauseitinvolvespracticaleleme
Howmanyartistsareontherecording?
随机试题
简答未成年诉讼特有的原则。
男孩,3岁,与同龄人相比体质较差,因怀疑先天性心脏病就诊。该患儿口唇黏膜青紫.轻度杵状指趾。胸骨左缘2—4肋间听到2—3级收缩期杂音,肺动脉第二音减弱,为确诊应做的检查是
商品房买卖合同中应明确()。
最常用的并购方式是()。
在息税前利润大于0的情况下,只要企业存在固定性经营成本,那么经营杠杆系数必()。
下列谱例中对C大调K64的解决最恰当的是()。
人们在和他人接触时有时会产生“士别三日,刮目相看”之感,此时产生了
模块独立性是软件模块化所提出的要求,衡量模块独立性的度量标准是模块的()。
Theshortageofrainfallthissummerintheregionissuretocause______ofvegetablesforthefoodmarket.
WhenFacebooksaiditwouldstartadatingserviceinColombiainSeptember,ErikaRamossignedup.Single,35,livinginBog
最新回复
(
0
)