首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Universities Branch Out From their student bodies to their research practices, universities are becoming more global.
Universities Branch Out From their student bodies to their research practices, universities are becoming more global.
admin
2013-06-02
43
问题
Universities Branch Out
From their student bodies to their research practices, universities are becoming more global.
By Richard Levin
As never before in their long history, universities have become instruments of national competition as well as instruments of peace. They are the locus of the scientific discoveries that move economies forward, and the primary means of educating the talent required to obtain and maintain competitive advantage. But at the same time, the opening of national borders to the flow of goods, services, information and especially people has made universities a powerful force for global integration, mutual understanding and geopolitical stability.
In response to the same forces that have propelled the world economy, universities have become more self-consciously global: seeking students from around the world who represent the entire spectrum of cultures and values, sending their own students abroad to prepare them for global careers, offering courses of study that address the challenges of an interconnected world and collaborative research programs to advance science for the benefit of all humanity.
Of the forces shaping higher education none is more sweeping than the movement across borders. Over the past three decades the number of students leaving home each year to study abroad has grown at an annual rate of 3.9 percent, from 800,000 in 1975 to 2.5 million in 2004. Most travel from one developed nation to another, but the flow from developing to developed countries is growing rapidly. The reverse flow, from developed to developing countries, is on the rise, too. Today foreign students earn 30 percent of the doctoral degrees awarded in the United States and 38 percent of those in the United Kingdom. And the number crossing borders for undergraduate study is growing as well, to 8 percent of the undergraduates at America’s Ivy League institutions and 10 percent of all undergraduates in the U.K. In the United States, 20 percent of newly hired professors in science and engineering are foreign-born, and in China the vast majority of newly hired faculty at the top research universities received their graduate education abroad.
What are the consequences of these shifts among the highly educated? Consider this: on the night after the attacks on the World Trade Center, Jewish students at Yale (most of them American) came together with Muslim students (most of them foreign) to organize a vigil. Or this: every year the student-run Forum for American/Chinese Exchange at Stanford (FACES) organizes conferences in both China and at Stanford, bringing together students from both countries chosen to discuss Sino-U. S. relations with leading experts. The leaders of student groups promoting international collaboration are in touch with each other daily via e-mail and Skype, technologies that not only facilitate cooperative projects but also increase the likelihood of creating lifelong personal ties. The bottom line: the flow of students across national borders-- students who are disproportionately likely to become leaders in their home countries-- enables deeper mutual understanding, tolerance and global integration.
As part of this, universities are encouraging students to spend some of their undergraduate experience in another country. In Europe, more than 140,000 students participate in the Erasmus program each year, taking courses for credit in one of 2,200 participating institutions across the continent. And in the United States, institutions are mobilizing their alumni to help place students in summer internships abroad to prepare them for global careers. Yale and Harvard have led the way, offering every undergraduate at least one international study or internship opportunity-- and providing the financial resources to make it possible. Universities are also establishing more-ambitious foreign outposts to serve students primarily from the local market rather than the parent campus. And true educational joint ventures are gaining favor, such as the 20-year-old Johns Hopkins-Nanjing program in Chinese and American Studies, the Duke Goethe executive M. B. A. program and the MIT-Singapore alliance, which offers dual graduate degrees in a variety of engineering fields.
Globalization is also reshaping the way research is done. One new trend involves sourcing portions of a research program to another country. Yale professor and Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Tian Xu directs a research center focused on the genetics of human disease at his alma mater, Shanghai’s Fudan University, in collaboration with faculty colleagues from both schools. The Shanghai center has 95 employees and graduate students working in a 4,300-square-meter laboratory facility. Yale faculty, postdocs and graduate students visit regularly and attend videoconference seminars with scientists from both campuses. The arrangement benefits both countries; Xu’s Yale lab is more productive, thanks to the lower costs of conducting research in China, and Chinese graduate students, postdocs and faculty get on-the-job training from a world-class scientist and his U.S. team.
Indeed, China is intent on playing all its cards. By investing heavily in research, tripling university enrollments between 1998 and 2004, and encouraging top students to think independently, the country is self-consciously using its universities as a means to stimulate economic growth. At the same time, since Deng Xiaoping first permitted Chinese students to seek education in the West in 1978, no country has made a more deliberate effort to send its most talented students abroad for a top education --especially at the graduate level. Today, in contrast to 10 or 20 years ago when economic opportunity was limited at home, most Chinese students return after graduation-- often with an appreciation of the values of a free society and a greater understanding of the countries where they studied.
Europe, by contrast, has lost its competitive edge. According to "The Future of European Universities: Renaissance or Decay?" a devastating recent critique by Confederation of British Industry Director General Richard Lambert and Nick Butler, Chief of Strategic Planning at British Petroleum, European governments have systematically weakened their top universities, once the pride of the world. They have invested too little in research, spread limited resources across too many institutions, expanded enrollments without increasing faculty and refused to allow universities sufficient autonomy, the report says. To flourish, they need to concentrate more resources in the hands of the strongest universities and allow them to generate revenue by charging tuition fees like their U.S. counterparts-- and awarding financial aid to those in greatest need.
For all its success, the United States remains deeply ambivalent about sustaining the research-university model. Most politicians recognize the link between investment in science and national economic strength, but support for research funding has been fitful and sporadic rather than steady. The budget of the National Institutes of Health doubled between 1998 and 2003, but has risen more slowly than inflation since then. Support for the physical sciences and engineering barely kept pace with inflation during that same period; legislation to double these expenditures in 10 years is currently pending. The attempt to make up lost ground is welcome, but the nation would be better served by steady, predictable increases in science funding at the rate of long-term GDP growth, which is on the order of inflation plus 3 percent per year.
Globalized universities are powerful in enhancing national competition and international stability.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
细节题。题文为“国际化的大学在加强民族竞争和国际稳定方面的作用很大”。本题考查关于大学的重要意义的细节。文章第一段讲述的是大学存在的重要意义。根据关键词"national competition,stability"和浏览顺序原则,定位在全文第一段第一句和最后一句。第一句说“大学已经成为国际竞争和和平的工具”,最后一句说“大学对于地理政治稳定来说作用很大”。结合文章的主题“国际化的大学”,可以判断本题与原文一致。因此,答案为[Y]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GU67777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Whenyougotoacompanyforaninterview,thereisnoneedtocarethefeelingsoftbereceptionists.Ifyonwanttoanswerthe
A、Adivorceinwhichbothhusbandandwifewanttocallthemarriageoff.B、Adivorceinwhichthecouplehavegotchildren,C、A
Alltrulygreatthoughtsareconceivedwhilewalking,observedNietzsche,thoughI’vealwaysbeenabitsuspiciousoftheeagern
Thegreatestrecentsocialchangeshavebeen【C1】______thelivesofwomen.Duringthetwentiethcenturytherehasbeenaremark
A、Historicsignificance.B、Splendorandpeacefulness.C、Culturalappeal.D、Beautyandcomfort.B短文一开头提到,犹他州只需用两个词来形容:壮美、宁静。故答案
Itisobviousthat______(经济波动会影响人们的生活).
A、Takingsmallstepsbitbybit.B、Havingagoodplan.C、Joiningatrainingclass.D、Learning30wordsperday.A事实细节题。Adams博士在对
Probablyatnotimeinhislifeistheaverageindividualmorelikelytobeconcernedabouttheproblemofmoralvaluesandstan
Probablyatnotimeinhislifeistheaverageindividualmorelikelytobeconcernedabouttheproblemofmoralvaluesandstan
HarlemRenaissancereferstoaperiodlastingformorethan10years,duringwhichagroupofAfricanandAmericanwritersprodu
随机试题
下丘脑的作用是()
以下关于焊合金的描述,哪项是错误的
《中华人民共和国环境影响评价法》对建设项目环境影响评价公众参与规定:建设单位报批的环境影响报告书应当附具对有关单位、专家和公众的意见()的说明。
下列属于建筑施工企业现场综合考评内容的有()。
下列不属于Excel2013中引用的类型的是()。
根据投资者对()的不同看法,其采用的证券组合管理方法可大致分为被动管理和主动管理两种类型。
通过重整计划草案需要满足的条件不正确的是()。
20世纪影响最广泛的儿童思维发展理论是()的儿童智慧发展理论。
物质观点是马克思主义哲学的主线,是贯穿于马克思主义哲学全部理论之中的基本观点。()
有如下函数过程:Functiongys(ByValxAsInteger,ByValyAsInteger)AsInteger DoWhileY<#0 preminder=x/y x=Y
最新回复
(
0
)