首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What is special about open-access journals?
What is special about open-access journals?
admin
2014-06-20
15
问题
What is special about open-access journals?
W: Many scientists support open-access in principle but winning jobs, grands, and tenure still requires publication in journals with established reputations. Can open-access journals, like PLoS, Biology both strap themselves into prominence?
M: All the data show that open-access journals have higher citation rates than closed-access journals. That is the reason open-access journals will succeed. There may be a prestige lack, but the value from open-access will erase that quickly. PLoS has from the start published papers of importance far more than any other start of journal, again a measure of the value of open access.
W: In September, the National Institute of Health proposed a new policy requiring all scientists who receive its funding to make their research results available to the public for free. Could it say the new policy, if adopted, could drive some journals out of business and that taxpayers will have to pay for a new open-access system. What’ s your response?
M: Taxpayers are paying for the research. The question is how much researcher should have to pay to get access to the results. We believe that the costs of open access publishing will be far less overall than the existing system. The costs to everyone will, thus, be less and the spread of knowledge greater.
W: Some worried that proprietary pressures are moving upstream to a certain ownership of data and researchers themselves rather than patterns and copyrights on the final research products. Did you share this concern?
M: Absolutely. We’ve expanded intellectual property restrictions without any evidence of the good they will do, and this religion of expansion will cause substantial harm to researcher and comers.
W: What’s the best solution?
M: The best solution is that we give up religion in the context of intellectual property and rely upon evidence. No new regulation should be adopted unless the proponent can show with real evidence that the restriction will do more good than harm.
选项
A、Revise regulations.
B、Expand the restriction.
C、Identify the harm.
D、Make no new restrictions.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GfXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Thesecondparagraphseemstosuggestthat______WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue?
Answerquestionsbyreferringtotheintroductionof3languageinstitutionsinAmerica.Note:Whenmorethanoneansweris
Paragraph2seemstosuggestthat______.Inparagraph5,thephrase"wallowingin"maybereplacedby______.
Dr.WilsonandMr.Wanghavemetbefore.
Accordingtothepassage,themassmediapresentuswith______.Theauthorusesthecomparisonwithbuildingacathedraltosh
Chocolateisnotagreatsourceofnutrients,butthere’snoharmineatingamoderateamount,especiallythedarkvariety,(31)
Chocolateisnotagreatsourceofnutrients,butthere’snoharmineatingamoderateamount,especiallythedarkvariety,(31)
Humanviolenceshowsevidenceofbeingalearnedbehaviorinthat______.Whatcanwelearnfromthelastparagraph?
Itwasamomentmostbusinessexecutiveswouldpausetosavor:latelastyear,GermansportinggoodspioneerAdidaslearnedthat
Howmenfirstlearnedtoinventwordsis(31);inotherwords,theoriginoflanguageisamystery.Allwereallyknowisthatm
随机试题
(2010年4月)根据名牌出名的范围不同,有五个等级的战略方案可供选择:
A.原因与效果图表B.奔跑图表C.相关图D.决策矩阵E.直方图表示两个变量之间变化关系和相互作用的图称为
临床上常用放射免疫技术检测的项目不包括
下面对矩估计法中原点矩和中心矩表述正确的是( )。
领导角色的类型不包括()。
现代决策理论认为,决策者是“理性的人”或“经济的人”,在决策时他们受“最优化”的行为准则支配,应当选择“最优”方案。()
视听觉的反射中枢位于()。
[*]
CigarettesmokingisahealthhazardofsufficientimportanceintheUnitedStates.Itwas50yearsagothismonththatAmerica’
HotterandmoremassivethantheSun,starscalled“stragglers”arepuzzlingtoastronomersbecausesuchrapidlyburningstarsw
最新回复
(
0
)