首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What is special about open-access journals?
What is special about open-access journals?
admin
2014-06-20
17
问题
What is special about open-access journals?
W: Many scientists support open-access in principle but winning jobs, grands, and tenure still requires publication in journals with established reputations. Can open-access journals, like PLoS, Biology both strap themselves into prominence?
M: All the data show that open-access journals have higher citation rates than closed-access journals. That is the reason open-access journals will succeed. There may be a prestige lack, but the value from open-access will erase that quickly. PLoS has from the start published papers of importance far more than any other start of journal, again a measure of the value of open access.
W: In September, the National Institute of Health proposed a new policy requiring all scientists who receive its funding to make their research results available to the public for free. Could it say the new policy, if adopted, could drive some journals out of business and that taxpayers will have to pay for a new open-access system. What’ s your response?
M: Taxpayers are paying for the research. The question is how much researcher should have to pay to get access to the results. We believe that the costs of open access publishing will be far less overall than the existing system. The costs to everyone will, thus, be less and the spread of knowledge greater.
W: Some worried that proprietary pressures are moving upstream to a certain ownership of data and researchers themselves rather than patterns and copyrights on the final research products. Did you share this concern?
M: Absolutely. We’ve expanded intellectual property restrictions without any evidence of the good they will do, and this religion of expansion will cause substantial harm to researcher and comers.
W: What’s the best solution?
M: The best solution is that we give up religion in the context of intellectual property and rely upon evidence. No new regulation should be adopted unless the proponent can show with real evidence that the restriction will do more good than harm.
选项
A、Revise regulations.
B、Expand the restriction.
C、Identify the harm.
D、Make no new restrictions.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GfXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Whatdoesthewomansuggestthemando?
Whatdoesthewomansuggestthemando?
Dr.WilsonandMr.Wanghavemetbefore.
Dr.WilsonandMr.Wanghavemetbefore.
Itissuggestedthatthewordmodernis______today.WhyistheIndustrialRevolutionnotarevolutioninthesensethatthis
______caresmostaboutpoliticsandsocialproblems?______wasespeciallyworshipedbyteenagers?
Chocolateisnotagreatsourceofnutrients,butthere’snoharmineatingamoderateamount,especiallythedarkvariety,(31)
Chocolateisnotagreatsourceofnutrients,butthere’snoharmineatingamoderateamount,especiallythedarkvariety,(31)
Humanviolenceshowsevidenceofbeingalearnedbehaviorinthat______.Thefunctionoflegalsystems,accordingtothepassa
随机试题
主要用于阴道、胃肠道及口腔真菌感染的药物是
女,55岁。早上小便后用纸擦见纸上都是血。诉就诊前一天去某养生院按摩,按摩师在给腰部按摩时特别用力,按摩后自我感觉腰部疼痛。检查:血常规正常,尿+++/HP。B超提示:肾增大,肾破裂,CT诊断一致。考虑出血的原因最可能的是
人民法院审理上诉行政案件,在哪些情况下必须作出发回重审裁定?()
光圈:照相机
根据所给资料,回答下列小题。2011年全国社会消费品零售总额达183919亿元,比2002年增长2.8倍,年均增长达16.1%。2011年城镇人均消费支出15160.9元,是2002年的2.5倍;2011年农村人均消费5221元,是2002年的2.8倍
(2012年试题,二)设A为3阶矩阵,|A|=3,A*为A的伴随矩阵,若交换A的第1行与第2行得矩阵B,则|BA*|__________.
网络拓扑设计对网络的影响主要表现在__________。(2013年上半年试题)①网络性能②系统可靠性③出口带宽④网络协议
Whattimeisitnow?
TheAmericanConstitutionwaswrittenforpeoplethatareabletogovernthemselves.JohnAdamswrote,"OurConstitutionwasmad
we__________(本来不必叫邻居帮忙)yesterday,becauseweactuallyhadenoughhands.
最新回复
(
0
)