首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
admin
2023-01-17
27
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and… find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals. Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry—making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature—
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows—as if we needed reminding—that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
Over the last 50 years, many Western scientists have been concerned about the consequences of________.
选项
A、giving antibiotics to farm animals
B、using antibiotics to treat human diseases
C、resistance to the use of antibiotics among farmers
D、using antibiotics to speed up weight gain in farm animals
答案
D
解析
根据第1段第1和第2句“50多年来,美国和欧洲的微生物学家警告不要使用抗生素催肥牲畜……进而危害人类健康”可知,科学家们担心使用抗生素催肥牲畜带来的后果,故D项为正确答案。A项“在农场牲畜身上使用抗生素”,根据第2段第1句得知抗生素用于给牲畜治病以及用低剂量抗生素来增肥,文章开头直接表明科学家担心的第2种做法,故A项表述不准确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GjcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
Scientistssentpatternsofelectricitycoursingacrosspeople’sbrains,coaxingtheirbrainstoseelettersthatweren’tthere.
Scientistssentpatternsofelectricitycoursingacrosspeople’sbrains,coaxingtheirbrainstoseelettersthatweren’tthere.
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
随机试题
成人血清铁的正常值为()
下列肝性脑病的防治措施中,正确的是()。
临床上乙琥胺仅用于
王、李、张约定各出资50万元设立甲有限公司,因王只有25万元,遂与张约定由张为其垫付出资25万元。公司设立时,张以价值50万元的房屋评估为75万元骗得验资。后债权人发现甲公司注册资本不实。甲公司欠缴的25万元出资应()。
关于城乡规划与国民经济和社会发展计划的关系,以下观点不妥的是()。
财务会计报告的使用者通常包括投资者、债权人、政府及相关机构、企业管理人员、职工和社会公众等。()
下列关于个人投资者收购企业股权后将盈余积累转增股本个人所得税的规定正确的有()。
中国特色社会主义由中国特色社会主义()三位一体构成。
随着全面二孩政策的实施,全国多地迎来了二孩生育小高峰,有些高龄产妇宁愿冒风险也要“拼二孩”。还有些育龄妇女由于经济成本高、职场压力大、缺乏家庭支持等原因,不敢生、不愿生。落实二孩政策,需要完善医疗资源、教育资源和相关配套措施,为符合条件的妇女提供社会、家庭
为了树立省会的文明形象并提升城市品位,市人民政府出台了“二环线以内禁止中巴营运”的文件。市政府要求:①公交部门新增300台豪华公交车和400~600辆高档的士;②部分原由中巴车运营的线路将由公交车代替,客流不足的线路将由政府财政出钱补贴;③公交车将普
最新回复
(
0
)