首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can societies be rich and green? [A]"If our economies are to flourish, if global poverty is to be eliminated and if the well-bei
Can societies be rich and green? [A]"If our economies are to flourish, if global poverty is to be eliminated and if the well-bei
admin
2019-03-21
41
问题
Can societies be rich and green?
[A]"If our economies are to flourish, if global poverty is to be eliminated and if the well-being of the world’s people enhanced—not just in this generation but in succeeding generations—we must make sure we take care of the natural environment and resources on which our economic activity depends. " That statement comes not, as you might imagine, from a stereotypical tree-hugging, save-the-world greenie(环保主义者), but from Gordon Brown, a politician with a reputation for rigour, thoroughness and above all, caution.
[B]A surprising thing for the man who runs one of the world’s most powerful economies to say? Perhaps: though in the run-up to the five-year review of the Millennium(千年的)Goals, he is far from alone. The roots of his speech, given in March at the roundtable meeting of environment and energy ministers from the G20 group of nations, stretch back to 1972, and the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm.
[C]"The protection and improvement of the human environment is a major issue which affects the well-being of peoples and economic development throughout the world," read the final declaration from this gathering, the first of a sequence which would lead to the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992 and the World Development Summit in Johannesburg three years ago.
[D]Hunt through the reports prepared by UN agencies and development groups—many for conferences such as this year’s Millennium Goals review—and you will find that the linkage between environmental protection and economic progress is a common thread.
[E]Managing ecosystems sustainably is more profitable than exploiting them, according to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. But finding hard evidence to support the thesis is not so easy. Thoughts turn first to some sort of global statistic, some indicator which would rate the wealth of nations in both economic and environmental terms and show a relationship between the two.
[F]If such an indicator exists, it is well hidden. And on reflection, this is not surprising: the single word "environment" has so many dimensions, and there are so many other factors affecting wealth—such as the oil deposits—that teasing out a simple economy—environment relationship would be almost impossible.
[G]The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, a vast four-year global study which reported its initial conclusions earlier this year, found reasons to believe that managing ecosystems sustainably— working with nature rather than against—might be less profitable in the short term, but certainly brings long-term rewards.
[H]And the World Resources Institute(WRI)in its World Resources 2005 report, issued at the end of August, produced several such examples from Africa and Asia: it also demonstrated that environmental degradation affects the poor more than the rich, as poorer people derive a much higher proportion of their income directly from the natural resources around them.
[I]But there are also many examples of growing wealth by trashing the environment, in rich and poor parts of the world alike, whether through unregulated mineral extractions, drastic water use for agriculture, slash-and-burn farming, or fossil-fuel-guzzling(大量消耗)transport. Of course, such growth may not persist in the long term—which is what Mr. Brown and the Stockholm declaration were both attempting to point out. Perhaps the best example of boom growth and bust decline is the Grand Banks fishery. For almost five centuries a very large supply of cod(鳕鱼)provided abundant raw material for an industry which at its peak employed about 40,000 people, sustaining entire communities in Newfoundland. Then, abruptly, the cod population collapsed. There were no longer enough fish in the sea for the stock to maintain itself, let alone an industry. More than a decade later, there was no sign of the ecosystem re-building itself. It had, apparently, been fished out of existence: and the once mighty Newfoundland fleet now gropes about frantically for crab on the sea floor.
[J]There is a view that modern humans are inevitably sowing the seeds of a global Grand Banks-style disaster. The idea is that we are taking more out of what you might call the planet’s environmental bank balance than it can sustain: we are living beyond our ecological means. One recent study attempted to calculate the extent of this " ecological overshoot of the human economy" , and found that we are using 1. 2 Earth’s-worth of environmental goods and services—the implication being that at some point the debt will be called in, and all those services—the things which the planet does for us for free—will grind to a halt.
[K]Whether this is right, and if so where and when the ecological axe will fall, is hard to determine with any precision—which is why governments and financial institutions are only beginning to bring such risks into their economic calculations. It is also the reason why development agencies are not united in their view of environmental issues: while some, like the WRI, maintain that environmental progress needs to go hand-in-hand with economic development, others argue that the priority is to build a thriving economy, and then use the wealth created to tackle environmental degradation.
[L]This view assumes that rich societies will invest in environmental care. But is this right? Do things get better or worse as we get richer. Here the Stockholm declaration is ambiguous. " In the developing countries," it says, " most of the environmental problems are caused by underdevelopment. " So it is saying that economic development should make for a cleaner world? Not necessarily. " In the industrialised countries, environmental problems are generally related to industrialisation and technological development," it continues. In other words, poor and rich both over-exploit the natural world, but for different reasons. It’s simply not true that economic growth will surely make our world cleaner.
[M]Clearly, richer societies are able to provide environmental improvements which lie well beyond the reach of poorer communities. Citizens of wealthy nations demand national parks, clean rivers, clean air and poison-free food. They also, however, use far more natural resources—fuel, water(all those baths and golf courses)and building materials.
[N]A case can be made that rich nations export environmental problems, the most graphic example being climate change. As a country’s wealth grows, so do its greenhouse gas emissions. The figures available will not be completely accurate. Measuring emissions is not a precise science, particularly when it comes to issues surrounding land use: not all nations have released up-to-date data, and in any case, emissions from some sectors such as aviation are not included in national statistics. But the data is exact enough for a clear trend to be easily discernible. As countries become richer, they produce more greenhouse gases: and the impact of those gases will fall primarily in poor parts of the world.
[O]Wealth is not, of course, the only factor involved. The average Norwegian is better off than the average US citizen, but contributes about half as much to climate change. But could Norway keep its standard of living and yet cut its emissions to Moroccan or even Ethiopian levels? That question, repeated across a dozen environmental issues and across our diverse planet, is what will ultimately determine whether the human race is living beyond its ecological means as it pursues economic revival.
The common theme of the UN reports is the relation between environmental protection and economic growth.
选项
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GzX7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Acleverclogknowseverythingintheworld.B、Allthelivingcreatureshavethesameancestor.C、Speciescanchangeintoothe
EveryoneremembersthewhitewashingsceneinTheAdventuresofTomSawyer.Buthowmanyrecallthescenethatprecedesit?Havin
WhyCan’tAmericanStudentsCompete?TwiceasmanystudentsinSingaporeareproficientinmathasintheUnitedStates.
TheAlzheimer’sAssociationandtheNationalAllianceforCaregivingestimatethatmenmakeupnearly40percentoffamilycare
A、Theclimatecanbeimprovedthroughconcreteaction.B、Theclimatecanbeimprovedthroughpoliticalwill.C、Theclimatecanb
StatesExperimentwithOut-of-ClassroomLearning[A]AttheendofAugust,mostofOhio’steenagerswillshakeofftheirsummert
StatesExperimentwithOut-of-ClassroomLearning[A]AttheendofAugust,mostofOhio’steenagerswillshakeofftheirsummert
StatesExperimentwithOut-of-ClassroomLearning[A]AttheendofAugust,mostofOhio’steenagerswillshakeofftheirsummert
Apioneeringheadteacheriscallingforallsecondaryschoolstofollowhisleadandstartclassesat11am,allowingteenagers
随机试题
Whenwasthelasttimeyouflashedafakesmileattheoffice?Forsome,itmaybejustanothermundaneaspectofworklife—putt
患者男性,23岁,以四肢无力3d为主诉来诊,患者于1周前淋雨,3d前出现四肢对称性乏力,以下肢为重,不能行走,且日益严重,于当地医院行血钾检测为正常,来诊。患者出现下列哪种症状更支持本诊断
药学人员在药学实践中,通过自我教育,不断改进缺点,体现了药学职业道德的()
关于我国公证制度,下列哪一选项是错误的?(卷一/2007年第49题)
在工程建设的()阶段,需要做到投资、质量、进度三者协调统一。
某教育部考试中心与行业主管部门合作开展考试业务,共取得收入180万元,其中支付行业主管部门合作费110万元;本月开展与考试相关的培训活动,取得收入20万元,其中包括为培训人员提供的复习资料9万元。则该教育部考试中心应缴纳的营业税为()万元。
甲公司于2×12年2月委托乙商店代销A产品1200件,该批产品的实际成本为250万元,代销价款(不含税)600万元,乙商店按代销价款的10%收取手续费。本年12月20日收到乙商店交付的代销清单,列明已销售A产品800件,甲公司收到代销清单时向乙商店开具增值
利润表各项目均需填列“本期金额”和“上期金额”两栏。其中“上期金额”栏内各项数字,应根据上年该期利润表的“本期金额”栏内所列数字填列。()
设函数f(x)=,g(x)=x3+x4,且当x→0时,f(x)与g(x)为等价无穷小,则a=()。
讨论f(x,y)=在点(0,0)处的连续性、可偏导性及可微性.
最新回复
(
0
)