首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strang
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strang
admin
2010-12-30
36
问题
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strangely enough, the answer to both these questions is yes. To some extent our intelligence is given us at birth, and no amount of special education can make a genius out of a child born with low intelligence. On the other hand, a child who lives in a boring environment will develop his intelligence less than a child who lives in rich and varied surroundings. Thus the limits of a person’s intelligence are fixed at birth, but whether or not he reaches those limits will depend on his environment. This view, now held by most experts, can be supported in a number of ways.
It is easy to show that intelligence is to some extent something we are born with. The closer the blood relationship between two people, the closer they are likely to be in intelligence. Thus if we take two unrelated people at random from the population, it is likely that their degrees of intelligence will be completely different. If, on the other hand, we take two identical twins, they will very likely be as intelligent as each other. Relations like brothers and sisters, parents and children, usually have similar intelligence, and this clearly suggests that intelligence depends on birth.
Imagine now that we take two identical twins and put them in different environments. We might send one, for example, to a university and the other to a factory where the work is boring. We could soon find differences in intelligence developing, and this indicates that environment as well as birth plays a part. This conclusion is also suggested by the fact that people who live in close contact with each other, but who are not related at all, are likely to have similar degrees of intelligence.
选项
A、at birth
B、through education
C、both at birth and through education
D、neither at birth nor though education
答案
C
解析
推论题。该文在第一段中作者表明了立场认为两个因素都与人的智力因素有关,第二段和第三段提供了论据进行证明。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HaLC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
InAmericansociety,one’ssuccessismeasuredby______.Intermsofsuccess,thePuritansvalueworkhighbecause______.
InformertimesdoctorsinTaiwan,whowereconsideredsaviors,weregreatlyadmired.Thisisnotonlybecausetheywereableto
Ithasoftenbeensaidbypeopleinvolvedinlanguageteachingthatastudentwhoreallywantstolearnwillsucceedinwhatever
______tofinishquickly.
Meateasily______inhotweather.
Isthereadarksidetothecomputerrevolution?Docomputersdoharmtooursociety?Itcertainlydoesn’tseemthatwayon
______todevelopmoreaccuratemethodsofeconomicforecastingisgenerallyrecognized.
Therearevariouswaysinwhichsexrolesandsex-rolestereotypesaretaught.Forexample,manyadultshandlebabiesdifferentl
Inanagewhenwastetodaymeansalacktomorrow,makinguseofeveryavailableresourcebecomesmoreandmoreimportant.Ascoa
随机试题
对于MRSA惑染首选治疗的药物是
渗透泵型控释制剂常用的半透膜材料渗透泵型控释制剂的具有高渗透压的渗透促进剂
1950年根据《土地改革法》,在实行农村土地制度改革中,将一部分农村土地划归了国家所有,主要包括()。
沥青路面施工中,当符合下列( )情况时应浇洒透层沥青。
会计账簿按外形的不同,可分为()。(5.1)
物质文化遗产是指拥有哪些价值的文物()
根据评价所运用的方法和标准,教学评价可分为()。
公文的作者是指()。
世界田径锦标赛3000米决赛中,始终跑在最前面的甲、乙、丙三人中,一个是美国选手,一个是德国选手,一个是肯尼亚选手,比赛结束后得知:(1)甲的成绩比德国选手的成绩好。(2)肯尼亚选手的成绩比乙的成绩差。(3)丙称赞肯尼亚选手发挥出色
Gettingauniversitydegreeisn’tjustgoodforyourmind—it’sgoodforyourheart,saysanewstudyinthejournalBMC(British
最新回复
(
0
)