首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2014-06-02
100
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly., all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investor— mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans—all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis, a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupts if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference—and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong: now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The international Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery—and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all—as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia—which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls—also seems to be on the mend. MalaYsia’s prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news—even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform—whatever countries tried, just about ali the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no mere money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korea’s industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
At the end of the passage, the writer seems to think that a full recovery of the Asian economy is______.
选项
A、due
B、remote
C、imaginative
D、unpredictable
答案
B
解析
本题为推理题。短文最后一段的最后一句说...they have along way to go.即这些国家(的经济全面复苏)有很长的路要走。故选项B(遥远的)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HjpO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothenews,forwhatdidNATOapologise?
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECT?
Asregardsofsocialconventions,wemustsayawordaboutthewell-1.______knownEnglishclasssystem.Thisisanembarrassin
USpresidentsnormallyservea(n)______term.
"Underprivilegedpeople"isoftenusedbythemassmediaasasubstitutefor"poorpeople";Linguistically,theformerisreferr
农历五月五日的端午节是为了纪念被昏庸君主贬官放逐而抱石投江自尽的古代诗人和忠臣屈原。最初人们将以竹叶包扎好的糯米粽子,投入屈原自尽的那条江,以祭祀亡灵。今天,人们在端午时节举行龙舟比赛,而粽子则由活生生的人来享用。农历八月十五日的中秋节是观赏满月
忽然发觉,在这个世界上,最珍贵的东西是免费的。阳光,是免费的。芸芸众生,没有谁能够离开阳光活下去;然而,从小到大,可曾有谁为自己享受过的阳光支付过一分钱?空气,是免费的。一个人只要活着,就需要源源不断的空气。可从古到今,又有谁为这须臾不
Theoceancoversthreequartersoftheearth’ssurface,produces90percentofallitslife-supportingoxygen,andisthedrivin
Women’smindsworkdifferentlyfrommen.Atleast,thatiswhat【M1】______mostmenareconvincedof.Psychologistsvi
A、Acustomerhastotipthewaitress.B、Acustomerhastopayeachtimehegetsdrinks.C、Acustomerhastopayforallthedrin
随机试题
夜间阵发性呼吸困难,可见于()
急性糜烂出血性胃炎的常见原因是
A.淡盐水B.姜汤C.米汤D.黄酒E.清茶内服大补阴丸宜用的药引是
某一25层高层建筑,如分别位于Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类场地上。当其他条件相同,问建筑处于下列哪一类场地上。其所受的总水平地震作用最大?
根据规范确定裸导体(钢芯铝线及管形导体除外)的正常最高工作温度不应大于下列哪一项数值?()
下列机床中,()是采用点位控制的数控机床。
同学从墨西哥回来,关于甲型HINl流感问题,你作为社区负责人,你怎么办?
Withthepossibleexceptionofequalrights,perhapsthemost【C1】______issueacrosstheUnitedStatestodayisthedeathpenalty
Thereisnosatisfactoryexplanationofstyle,noinfallibleguidetogoodwriting,noassurancethatapersonwhothinksclearl
Betterthinktwicebeforechoosingapasswordforemails,onlinebankaccountsandairlinetickets.Passwordsthatshownoi
最新回复
(
0
)