首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
admin
2014-12-11
36
问题
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
I. Character analysis
—character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis
of a Shakespearean play —characters in a typical 【B1】 doing particular things in 【B1】______
every play
—conflicts involved characters
—characters being on trial
II. Three main reasons for approaching Shakespearean plays
by analyzing characters
A. Plays with active characters like people around us
—the appeal of the genre
—seeing the play as 【B2】 itself 【B2】______
B. Shakespeare’s ability to 【B3】 characters 【B3】______
—individual personality with experience requiring an
evaluation
—individual actors’ need to 【B4】 upon the motivations 【B4】______
for their characters
C. The play including 【B5】 itself, for the reason that 【B5】______
characters are trying to understand their own characters
III. The merits and weaknesses of the approach illustrated
by 【B6】 interpretations of 19th century 【B6】______
A. Values
—always reminding of the central concern — 【B7】 【B7】______
—keeping in touch with the reason why Shakespeare 【B8】 【B8】______
B. Problems
—not enough 【B9】 about characters: 【B9】______
1) key elements full character analysis needs are 【B10】 【B10】______
2) for the lack of evidence, the analysis often ends with
trivial matters.
【B6】
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
Good morning, everyone. Last time I just gave a brief introduction to the Shakespearean play, today we will go further to discuss together how to understand a Shakespearean play. The most obvious way to begin an interpretation of a Shakespearean play is by evaluating the characters. [1] Any play involves characters in a particular setting, doing particular things. The plot will develop a conflict, which will usually inflict pain or distress on some people, and will lead to a final resolution of sorts in which some characters may die or be punished severely, while others survive or triumph or get substantially rewarded. Hence, one clear entry into such a work is to put the characters on trial: Who is good? Who is bad? Why do certain people act in certain ways? Do any of the characters change? Where are my sympathies as I make my way through this play? As an interpreter, I am, in essence, the judge, and how shall I apportion my verdicts?
Interpreting a play by analyzing the characters in it, judging them, and coming to some final evaluation of them is a natural way to approach Shakespeare for three main reasons. The first is that these are plays, and they inevitably feature active characters more or less recognizably like people around us. That, indeed, is the chief appeal of the genre. [2] So it is entirely natural to treat the play as we treat life itself, by responding to the people we see, the actions they carry out, the words they use, and the decisions they make. On the basis of these observations we will come to some conclusions about the characters and will discuss the play in those terms.
[3] The second reason is that Shakespeare is famous, more than anyone else, for his astonishing ability to create interesting, complex, and natural characters. Unlike many other dramatists whose characters do not invite very complex investigation, Shakespeare has the ability to fill a play with scores of characters, each of whom talks in a language and acts in a way which indicates a sharply focused individual personality with a very particular response to experience. Hence, it is, once again, natural to treat them as fully realized people whose conduct requires an evaluative judgment.
Then, too, the fact that we are dealing with plays always keeps the approach through character analysis alive,[4] because theatre productions depend upon individual actors, and individual actors need to reflect upon the motivations for their characters. They have to, in a sense, discover their human qualities and become the stage people whose lives they enact. Thus, the dramatic tradition of continuing to mount Shakespeare productions ensures that the analysis of character will remain a powerful force in the interpretation of the plays.
The third major reason why character analysis is an important approach to Shakespeare’s plays is (as Harold Bloom has repeatedly pointed out) that Shakespeare’s characters are often intrigued or puzzled by their own characters. That is, they make their characters part of the dramatic "problem" of the fiction we are exploring. When, for example, Hamlet or Macbeth or Othello starts to wrestle with his own character, trying to understand his own motivation, feelings, and actions, that moment places the nature of the character as an essential element in the work (in a way that is markedly different from texts in which a character’s personality does not create particular problems for him). [5] In other words, the plays themselves put character analysis directly on the table.
The approach to a Shakespeare play which places the analysis of character at the centre of the process was particularly strong in the nineteenth century, [6] and the literary interpretations from that period often illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of that approach. [7] The great value of character analysis is that it always reminds us that, whatever else we may want to talk of, the central concern is particular human beings. Whatever else King Lear is about, it is centrally about a suffering old man, whose unique character brings upon him almost unimaginable suffering. Whatever we make of Hamlet, we cannot forget that the people in the play drive Ophelia insane and lead her to suicide, and that she is an innocent and loving young woman. [8] Focusing upon the characters in the play always keeps us in touch with a major reason why Shakespeare matters — his works constantly illuminate human nature in all sorts of moving ways.
That said, however, treating the interpretation of a play as primarily a matter of evaluating character can create problems. [9] One major problem, of course, is that in many instances we do not know enough about a character to arrive at a sufficiently full understanding of his or her personality. We know almost nothing of Hamlet’s childhood, or Bolingbroke’s inner thoughts, or Lady Macbeth’s sexuality. [10] Thus, key elements required in any lull character analysis are missing. Of course, we can speculate on such matters, but such speculations can often end up in inconclusive and often trivial debates, because there is not enough evidence. So we can find criticism by the analysis of character degenerating into explorations of the girlhood of Shakespeare’s heroines, endless arguments about whether or not the Macbeths had any children, how old Hamlet might be or whether he is really insane or not, whether Falstaff is a coward or not, how black Othello really is, or what Antony and Cleopatra really talk about when they are alone together. Shakespearean plays are great inheritance as well as wealth for the humankind. The characters in his plays give us lots of insights to know and to talk with Shakespeare’s soul. I hope my lecture has led you on the way to the thought of this great player. Thank you for listening.
选项
答案
literary
解析
在讲完人物分析的三个原因后,演讲者提到,19世纪对莎士比亚戏剧进行的分析主要是“人物分析”,那个阶段的文学分析(literary interpretations)经常会体现thestrengths and weaknesses of that approach,即性格分析的优点和不足。本题所在处考查“文学分析”,即literary interpretations。注意题干将讲座中的内容转换成了被动语态。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HtdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
NoEnglishmanbelievesinworkingfrombooklearning.Hesuspectseverythingnew,anddislikesit,unlesshecanbecompelledb
Arapidmeansoflong-distancetransportationbecameanecessityfortheUnitedStatesassettlementspreadfartherwestward.F
Becausehumananatomydoesnotchange(exceptoverlongperiodsoftime),knowledgeacquiredacenturyagowasstillaccurateto
在人际关系问题上我们不要太浪漫主义。人是很有趣的,往往在接触一个人时首先看到的都是他或她的优点。这一点颇像是在餐馆里用餐的经验。开始吃头盘或冷碟的时候,印象很好。吃头两个主菜时,也是赞不绝口。愈吃愈趋于冷静,吃完了这顿宴席,缺点就都找出来了。于是转喜为怒,
SaccoandVanzettiwerearrestedandsentencedtodeathbecause______.
我一直以为大学校长是高瞻远瞩、指导学术与教育大方向的决策人,而不是管馒头稀饭的保姆,但这也暂且不提。这一类型的教育者的用心,毋庸置疑,当然是善意的。问题是,我们论“事”的时候,用心如何根本不重要,重要的是实际的后果,而教育的后果何其严重!在这种过度呵护的幼
________,whowereFrench-speaking,achievedthefinalunificationofEngland.
Studentslivinginthecampushavedifferentviewsonvisitationhoursestablishedforgirls’dormitory,whileyoucanvisitboy
Attheturnofthe18thand19th,centuries______appearedinEnglandasanewtrendinliterature.
随机试题
ENIAC的主要缺点是:
乳腺癌出现"酒窝征"的机制是
健康教育的目标之一是使社区内高血压患者减少食用盐的使用量,每日食用盐的使用量控制在5g以内。据此,健康教育的主要对象是
检查肱骨外上髁炎的试验
A.挥发油类B.生物碱类C.苷类D.有机酸类E.油脂类常采用炒、蒸、烘等方法破坏酶的活性以免有效成分损失的是()
下列选项中,不属于所得税的是()。
我国银行风险的主要表现形式是( )。
下列没有语病的一项是()。
RuinsrecentlydiscoveredinsouthernPerucouldbetheancient"lostcity"ofPaititi,accordingtoclaimsthataredrawingser
Thefirstthingtodoafterreceivingacreditcardisto______.
最新回复
(
0
)