首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)The idea of creating a system that allows the underprivileged the opportunity to break the cycle and achieve something is pra
(1)The idea of creating a system that allows the underprivileged the opportunity to break the cycle and achieve something is pra
admin
2016-12-06
45
问题
(1)The idea of creating a system that allows the underprivileged the opportunity to break the cycle and achieve something is praiseworthy. So it never ceases to amaze me how something so noble can be so blatantly abused and the offenders are able to get away with it.
(2)I live in a country—the only country, I might add—that was colonised through an act of diplomacy and not force. The citizens of the country became members of the British Empire by scratching ink on the paper of a poorly translated treaty that disadvantaged them from the beginning. All because of some greedy Brits wanted to trade land for glass beads, tobacco and blankets.(In some ways, this treaty protected the natives from some pretty nasty scams, but only so that the government could scam the tribes themselves). The third article of this treaty allowed the "natives"(although their claim to be native of the land in question is dubious in itself—they were merely there before the British)all the rights and benefits of a subject under the rule of Her Majesty Queen Victoria. The history lesson is nearly over—bear with me, it is relevant.
(3)The rights and benefits of becoming a member of the British Empire included the banning of the native language to be taught in schools and used to communicate in public. The savages were to be tamed. For a country so progressive that gave women the vote 10 years before the rest of the world(if only to call a politician’s bluff), this was a barbaric act. But these acts of naturalisation, and reparation have since been carried out by the government for the last 50-75 years, allowing the natives extra rights and benefits as to soothe the indignity done to their ancestors. Now a considerable number of the "disenfranchised" live on a social welfare benefit from the government, and can afford cable TV, all the latest mod-cons and a fast track into the good life of higher education(all subsidised, of course)in the name, not of affirmative action — although it is—but of racial appeasement. Now I could talk about some of the blind privileges that come with this, but I will save that essay for another day. The topic I wish to address today are those who are born with silver spoons in their mouths that claim these benefits without batting an eyelid.
(4)In order to claim a number of these benefits, one need only 1/16th of native blood in one’s family to be considered "native". So you have blond-haired blue-eyed "natives" that have no clue of their whakapapa, let alone can speak the language. These young opportunists come from upper class families. They went to the best private schools, and for birthdays, mummy and daddy dearest sent them around the world to see history and what real culture is. These bright young things have trust funds amounting to tens of thousands that they will get when they turn 21. They’re on a first name basis with all the hot shot company directors and politicians, and they still have the audacity to claim—and receive—the scholarships and benefits their less fortunate counterparts deserve.
(5)This is where the "blind eye" of privilege amazes me. As Betacandy’s first post so beautifully sets out—privilege is something given or assumed so often that a set of actions and expectations are built up and become a normal attitude to associate with specific practices, races and gender. The selection process assures us that equal opportunities are afforded to each applicant(that assertion is worth another whole rant in itself). How can the close examination of each applicant—their achievements and background—allow such a gross abuse of privilege to take place? This is merely one country where it happens, and I could go on for ever on this subject.
(6)The privileged are simply that—privileged. What gives them the right to take for themselves the opportunities offered to those who cannot afford to pay for the experience in the first place? Somebody, please, answer me this.
According to the fifth paragraph, the author thinks that the "selection process"______.
选项
A、offers equal opportunity to each applicant
B、closely examines each applicant
C、allows a gross abuse of privileges
D、neglects achievements and background
答案
C
解析
第5段第3句中的assures表明该句提到的是政府对享受优惠的对象进行的筛选过程的态度,而下一句疑问句的形式表示作者对此筛选过程的质疑,在这两句中,selection process和close examination是同一回事,可见,第4句中作者对close examination的质疑也就是对selection process的质疑,因此,本题应选C。A和B不是作者对selection process的态度,而是政府对selection process的立场。D中的neglect缺乏原文依据。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ICJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
MostChinesepeoplewenttoworkbybikewithinliving______
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
ThevocabularyandgrammaticaldifferencesbetweenBritishandAmericanEnglisharesotrivialandfewashardly______.
Lastyear,Ipaidathree-dayvisittothecompanyasavisitingengineer,andwastreated______.
ImmigrantstotheUKarebeingtestedontheirEnglishskillsbeforebeingabletoclaimincome-relatedbenefitsunderanewsch
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
WhichofthefollowingadverbscanNOTbeusedtocomplete"______everybodycame"?
Itwassuggestedthatallgovernmentministersshould______informationontheirfinancialinterests.
ThePresidentexplainedthatthepurposeoftaxationwasto______governmentspending.
ProfessorWangisalwayswillingtoaccept______correctionsonhisessays.
随机试题
女性62岁,绝经11年,阴道不规出血2个月,查体肥胖、糖尿病史。妇科检查:阴道少许血液、宫颈光、子宫正常大、双附件正常。
A.阳虚血瘀证B.风热犯肺C.气营两燔D.寒凝血瘀E.肾阴虚火旺舌色淡紫而湿润属于
不属于传染性非典型肺炎糖皮质激素的使用指征是()
某进口机械制造设备若按人民币计算,其离岸价为1000万元,到岸价为1100万元,银行手续费为5万元,进口关税为160万元,消费税为零,增值税税率为15%,则其增值税额为( )。
关于预测误差的正确理解是()。
下列各项中,按照营业税法律制度规定应征收营业税的有()。
调查报告属于()
下列文学常识的表述,不正确的一项是()。
一、注意事项1.申论考试是对应考者阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出问题和解决问题能力、文字表达能力的测试。2.参考时限:阅读资料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定资料,按照后面提出的“作答要求”依次作答。二、给定资料
1989年,时任美国国务院顾问的弗朗西斯·福山抛出了所谓的“历史终结论”,认为西方实行的自由民主制度是“人类社会形态进步的终点”和“人类最后一种统治形式”。然而,20年来的历史告诉我们,终结的不是历史,而是西方的优越感。就在柏林墙倒塌20年后的2009年1
最新回复
(
0
)