首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The U.S. and China don’t agree on much these days. Germany and France share a border and a currency but are frequently at odds.
The U.S. and China don’t agree on much these days. Germany and France share a border and a currency but are frequently at odds.
admin
2022-10-29
25
问题
The U.S. and China don’t agree on much these days. Germany and France share a border and a currency but are frequently at odds. The U.K. and India like to march to their own drum. But there’s one issue on which all these countries see eye to eye: Technology companies are too big, too powerful, and too profitable. And that power is only likely to intensify, leaving governments with no choice but to confront it head-on by taking the companies to court, passing new competition laws, and perhaps even breaking up the tech giants.
China is the latest to implement an anti-trust crackdown, unveiling anti-monopoly rules last month. The draft rules followed the surprise suspension of a $37 billion stock offering by billionaire Jack Ma’s Ant Group Co., making clear that no company can evade the government’s regulation. The moves in China coincide with accelerating efforts in the U.S. and Europe to rein in Amazon.com, Apple, Facebook, and Google.
"The big get bigger and bigger but without being better," says Andreas Schwab, a German member of the European Parliament who championed a 2014 resolution to break up Google. "Growing economic power, growing influence on local markets all over the world, and a growing concern of competitors and consumers altogether have made it happen now."
In this new anti-trust era, the old focus on pricing power no longer applies, because several of the biggest tech companies have established trillion-dollar monopolies by charging consumers next to nothing. Tech giants are increasingly assuming powerful positions in banking, finance, advertising, retail, and other markets that force smaller businesses to rely on their platforms to reach customers.
For years, Europe alone confronted the power of digital giants. Governments were alarmed that European companies were failing to match Silicon Valley’s innovations or to stop Google and Facebook from vacuuming up personal data and, with that, advertising revenue. Led by Margrethe Vestager, the European Union’s competition chief, countries have sought to police the market and encourage fair play.
In China the crackdown has been driven at least partly by fear that the homegrown tech industry is becoming too powerful. The country has long championed Alibaba and Tencent, but their massive accumulation of data on the Chinese citizenry is a growing concern for Beijing.
In the U.S., a new breed of anti-trust experts argues that consideration should be given to privacy, control over data, workers’ rights, and the overall impact on smaller companies. And the public in general have grown increasingly skeptical of social media companies. More than 60% say the sector has a negative effect on the country, and almost half want more regulation for social media, according to a 2020 Pew Research Center study.
What have EU countries done to confront the power of digital giants?
选项
A、They have imposed strict regulation over digital giants’ advertising.
B、They have considered regulatory action to promote fair competition.
C、They have limited sales of digital giants’ products.
D、They have sought to protect consumers’ privacy.
答案
B
解析
根据题干信息词EU countries和confront the power of digital giants可以将答案线索定位到第五段。第五段开头提及“多年来,仅欧洲在与数字巨头的力量对抗”。最后一句提及“在欧盟竞争事务专员玛格丽特.维斯塔格的带领下,各国一直在设法监管市场并鼓励公平竞争”。B项与原文相符,为正确选项。原文未提及欧盟各国对数字巨头的广告实施了严格监管,A项排除。原文未提及欧盟各国对数字巨头的产品限制销售,而且限制销售不属于公平竞争,C项排除。原文虽提及谷歌和脸书收集个人数据,但并未提及欧盟各国设法保护消费者的隐私,D项排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ITR7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Toencouragetheinventorstogotocivilcourts.B、Tomakesurethepatentisvalidfor20years.C、Tohaveanagreementwith
A、Itoffersabetterchancetohigh-levelstudents.B、Itdivideschildrenofffordifferentschools.C、Itselectsstudentsfort
A、Itrequirestoomuchtravelingtodifferentcities.B、Itlimitsinteractionamongstudents.C、Itwillincreaseclasssize.D、I
A、Itcanalleviatesomestress.B、Itcanimproveourmemories.C、Itcanhelpusgainself-comfort.D、Itcanhelpusgetahighm
A、About10millionpeopledieofsmokingeveryyear.B、Mostdeathsfromsmokingoccurinhigh-incomecountries.C、Smokingcanbr
A、SheisagainstteachingEnglish.B、Englishshouldn’tbethegloballanguage.C、TranslationshouldreplaceteachingEnglish.D、
NicolaSturgeon’sspeechlastTuesdaysettingouttheScottishgovernment’slegislativeprogrammefortheyearaheadconfirmedw
A、Theyareterrifyinginappearance.B、Theyareattractivebutpoisonous.C、Theyareontheedgeofextinction.D、Theyarenativ
A、Becausehumanbeingsarepowerfulenoughtokilloneanother.B、Becauseeveryspecieswillbecomeextinctbynaturalselection
A、Bantheresearchonautonomousweapons.B、Drafttreatiestoprohibitautonomousweapons.C、Raceagainsttimeinproducingauto
随机试题
可以发生肝癌的肝硬化有
Themanagingdirectortookthe______fortheaccident,althoughitwasnotreallyhisfault.
A.苯丙酮尿症B.重症联合免疫缺陷症C.无丙种球蛋白血症D.Down综合征E.慢性髓细胞白血病
某企业进口一批小轿车,共120辆,每辆小轿车的到岸价为70000元,消费税为7700元。关税税率为110%。该企业将其中110辆进行销售,取得销售额为234000元(含税)。该企业购进小轿车可以抵扣的进项税额为()元。
在海关行政处罚案件中,应当事人要求举行听证的,听证的费用应当由当事人承担。()
甲公司为一物流企业,经营国内、国际货物运输业务。由于拥有的货轮出现了减值迹象,甲公司于20×8年12月31日对其进行减值测试。相关资料如下:(1)甲公司以人民币为记账本位币,国内货物运输采用人民币结算,国际货物运输采用美元结算。(2)货轮
某单位买了一些圆珠笔分给A、B、Cj三个办公室,平均每人正好分到4支。若只分给B办公室,则平均每人正好分到6支;若只分给C办公室,则平均每人正好分到18支。如果A办公室的人数接近10人,那么C办公室有多少人?
增加击中的奖励数会使()
February21IkaikaKahoano64MamalahoaHighwayHolualoa,Hawaii96725DearMr.Kahoano,Iamwritingtoconfirmtheagreementw
"SocialReadjustmentScales"HolmesandRahedevelopedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS)tomeasurelifechangeas
最新回复
(
0
)