首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology
admin
2013-01-20
87
问题
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology developed slowly indeed. Medieval historians tell of the centuries it took for key inventions like the watermill or the heavy plow to diffuse across the landscape. During this period, increases in technology led to increases in the population, with little if any appearing as an improvement in the median standard of living.
Even the first century of the industrial revolution produced more "improvements" than "revolutions" in standards of living. With the railroad and the spinning and weaving of textiles as important exceptions, most innovations of that period were innovations in how goods were produced and transported, and in new kinds of capital, but not in consumer goods. Standards of living improved but styles of life remained much the same.
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries saw a faster and different kind of change. For the first time, technological capability outran population growth and natural resource scarcity. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the typical inhabitant of the leading economies—a British, a Belgian, an American, or an Australian had perhaps three times the standard of living of someone in a pre-industrial economy.
Still, so slow was the pace of change that people, or at least aristocratic intellectuals, could think of their predecessors of some two thousand years before as effectively their contemporaries. Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman aristocrat and politician, might have felt more or less at home in the company of Thomas Jefferson. The plows were better in Jefferson’s time. Sailing ships were much improved. However, these might have been insufficient to create a sense of a qualitative change in the order of life for the elite. Moreover, being a slave of Jefferson was probably a lot like being a slave of Cicero.
So slow was the pace of change that intellectuals in the early nineteenth century debated whether the industrial revolution was worthwhile, whether it was an improvement or a degeneration in the standard of living. Opinions were genuinely divided, with as optimistic a liberal as John Stuart Mill coming down on the "pessimist" side as late as the end of the 1840s.
In the twentieth century, however, standards of living exploded. In the twentieth century, the magnitude of the growth in material wealth has been so great as to make it nearly impossible to measure. Consider a sample of consumer goods available through Montgomery Ward in 1895 when a one-speed bicycle cost $65. Since then, the price of a bicycle measured in "nominal" dollars has more than doubled (as a result of inflation). Today, the bicycle is much less expensive in terms of the measure that truly counts, its "real" price: the work and sweat needed to earn its east. In 1895, it took perhaps 260 hours’ worth of the average American worker’s production to amass enough money to buy a one-speed bicycle. Today an average American worker can buy one—and of higher quality—for less than 8 hours worth of production.
On the bicycle standard (measuring wealth by counting up how many bicycles the labor can buy) the average American worker today is 36 times richer than his or her counterpart was in 1895. Other commodities would tell a different story. An office chair has become 12.5 times cheaper in terms of the time it takes the average worker to produce enough to pay for it. A Steinway piano or an accordion is only twice as cheap. A silver teaspoon is 25 percent more expensive.
Thus the answer to the question "How much wealthier are we today than our counterparts of a century ago?" depends on which commodities you view as important. For many personal services—having a butler to answer the door and polish your silver spoons—you would find little difference in average wealth between 1895 and 1990: an hour of a butler’s time costs about the same then as now. For mass-produced manufactured goods—like bicycles—we are wealthier by as much as 36 times.
Commodities in the twentieth century
选项
A、are impossible to compare across centuries.
B、are more expensive than the nineteenth century.
C、are cheaper than they were in the nineteenth century.
D、need to be measured by comparing upper-class essentials such as having a butler.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IZ2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
ThisyearthecombinedadvertisingrevenuesofGoogleandYahoo!willrivalthecombinedprimetimeadrevenuesofAmerica’sthre
Theboardofthecompanyhasdecidedto______itsoperationtoincludeallaspectsoftheclothingbusiness.
Afewyearsago,therichworld’sworryabouteconomicinteractionwithdevelopingcountrieswasthatthepoorcouldnotprofit
Inhisview,thoughHongKonghasnodirectculturalidentity,localartisthrivingby"being______",beingopentoallkindso
Thirty-onemillionAmericansareover60yearsofage,andtwenty-ninemillionofthemarehealthy,busy,productivecitizens.B
Althoughwedecoratedtheroomonlysixmonthsago,thepaintontheceilingisalready______becauseofthedamp.
Althoughthepolicearegivenconsiderableauthoritybysocietytoenforceitslaws,theygetarelativelylowsalaryascompare
Thegovernmentistryingtodosomethingto____betterunderstandingbetweenthetwocountries.
Therelationshipbetweenformaleducationandeconomicgrowthinpoorcountriesiswidelymisunderstoodbyeconomistsandpoliti
随机试题
穿管敷设时,管内导线的总面积(包括绝缘层)不应超过管内截面积的_________%。
以下属于卫生服务需求特点的是
A、甲状腺单纯性囊肿B、甲状腺腺瘤囊变C、与颈前肌粘连,滤泡退化,形成“假囊肿”D、充满胶质的无回声区E、位于甲状腺与舌骨间亚急性甲状腺炎表现为
为防止近效期药品售出后可能发生的过期使用,药品零售企业应当对药品的有效期进行
下列关于环境噪声污染防治的说法中,错误的是()。
人力资源预测的局限性包括()
根据艾森克的人格维度理论,不稳定外倾型表现为好冲动、好斗、易激动等,相当于()气质。
Hewrotealotofnovels,noneof______wastranslatedintoforeignlanguages.
党的十六届六中全会上,我们党提出建设社会主义核心价值体系,其基本内容包括()。
研究显示,相比于农村地区,城市地区居民哮喘、湿疹、过敏性鼻炎和结膜炎等疾病患病率不断攀升。有个假设是乡村生活环境中的某些因素,譬如自小接触到特定细菌能让人免受对某些过敏源的危害,或是城市地区的许多污染物诱发了这些过敏症的发展。对这段文字理解正确的一项是:
最新回复
(
0
)