首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
admin
2018-05-09
43
问题
Things You Can’t Say in Canada
A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others—but it can also be a lot of fun. Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos—the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own civilized tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
B) It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might walk secretly up to you afterwards and tell you that they secretly agree. So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree—or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
C) Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books. The queen of Canadian literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of unpleasant characters and plot filled with torture. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she has put us on the global map. And because if they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
D) Recycling is a waste of time and money. Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives. Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
E) Only private enterprise can save public health care. Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, "private" is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
F) David Suzuki is bad for the environment. From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near. He is our homegrown prophet of doom, who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell. The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
G) A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids. Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system. No doubt convenient daycare is a gift sent by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
H) Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre (类型) painters. I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time. But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art—the kind of art it’s safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
I) The United States is the greatest force for ever the world has ever known. Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity. At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully (欺负弱小者) that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom—and its purchasing power—around the world.
Criticizing the United States is the Canada’s national identity.
选项
答案
I
解析
根据Criticizing,the United States定位到I段的第3句,题目表述跟该句意思相同,故选I。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ib47777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Nearly5,000peoplebelowtheageof21diebecauseofexcessivealcoholconsumptioneachyear.Oddly,thishastriggeredanew
ArtificialIntelligence(AI)A)Weoftendon’tnoticeit,butartificialintelligence(AT)isallaroundus.Itispresentinco
Divorcedoesn’tnecessarilymakeadultshappy.Buttoughingitoutinanunhappymarriageuntilitturnsaroundjustmightdo,a
Arewereadyforthelibraryofthefuture?A)Librarianstodaywilltellyoutheirjobisnotsomuchtotakecareofbooks
TipsforThoseWhoTravelAloneA)Whenitcomestotraveling,sometimestakingajourneyalonecanbegreat.Travelingalone
Thecommunicationsexplosionisonthescaleoftherail,automobileortelephonerevolution.Verysoonyou’llbeabletorecord
Thecommunicationsexplosionisonthescaleoftherail,automobileortelephonerevolution.Verysoonyou’llbeabletorecord
A、Itiscomfortable.B、Itisbestmade.C、Itcausesnopollution.D、Itmakeslessnoise.C短文提到,电动汽车最大的优点在于它不会污染环境,因此可视为目前最好的替代品,
随机试题
不符合慢性呼吸衰竭患者建立人工气道目的的是
A.年龄B.药物的剂量C.疾病因素D.遗传因素E.药物的理化性质中国人和日本人多为快乙酰化型,而白种人多为慢乙酰化型的影响因素为()。
处方写白术,应付()
甲和乙于4月20日签订瓷器买卖合同,约定5月6日甲将瓷器以5000元的价格交付给乙,丙知道该合同后于4月22日与乙签订买卖合同,约定5月10日乙将该瓷器以6000元的价格交付给丙。4月28日,甲将该瓷器以7000元的价格卖与丙,并交付。下列说法中不正确的是
在我国招标方式有公开招标、邀请招标的议标()
在国外建筑安装工程费用中,属于开办费的项目是()。
民族自治地方有关调整经济关系的自治条例和单行条例也是我国经济法的渊源之一。()
下列关于公民权利和义务的说法,错误的是()。
2019年1月15日至16日,中央政法工作会}义在北京召开。中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席习近平出席会议并发表重要讲话,指出:
下列哪些是原型化方法的优点?Ⅰ.提供了验证用户需求的环境Ⅱ.接受需求的不确定性和风险Ⅲ.改变用户和开发者通信的困难Ⅳ.文档的自动生成Ⅴ.简化了项目管理
最新回复
(
0
)