首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
This Coronavirus affects everyone, but not equally. The young often shrug off the virus; the old often die of it. The rich shrug
This Coronavirus affects everyone, but not equally. The young often shrug off the virus; the old often die of it. The rich shrug
admin
2022-06-18
53
问题
This Coronavirus affects everyone, but not equally. The young often shrug off the virus; the old often die of it. The rich shrug off the economic shock; the poor cannot. Because of COVID-19, the number of extremely poor people (i.e., those making less than $1.90 a day) will rise by 70m-100m this year, the World Bank predicts. Using a broader measure, including those who lack basic shelter or clean water and children who go hungry, the ranks of the poor will swell by 240m^90m this year, says the UN. That could reverse almost a decade of progress (see International section). If a vaccine is found, economies will no doubt bounce back. But widespread vaccination will take years and the very poor cannot wait that long. By then, malnutrition will have affected a tragic number of children’s bodies and minds.
Safety-nets in low-income countries are
cobweb-thin
. Governments there have handed out only $4 extra per person on social programs—in total, not per day.
Donors should help. Rich countries are on course to cut direct aid by a third compared with last year. The IMF and World Bank have raised lending, but only 31% more of the bank’s money has reached poor countries, says the Center for Global Development, a think-tank, about half the increase in the global financial crisis, a much smaller shock.
Governments in some countries, meanwhile, need to spend their money wisely. Too many offer pork for old rich friends but only crumbs for the poor. Since the crisis began, one country has provided no new programs for the hard-up but has given a state oil giant tax breaks worth $2.7bn. Another country is expected soon to confirm another wasteful effort to keep its money-losing airline aloft. Even when money is earmarked for good ends, it is too often wasted or stolen. The country’s investigators are probing possible fraud in 658 contracts worth $300m for COVID-fighting kit (测试纸) Still another country’s health ministry bought some masks for $53 each. In a leaked recording, a laughter allegedly belonging to an official burst out as she and her colleagues appear to plan to pocket money meant for reducing suffering in the pandemic.
The best way to help the poor is to give them money directly. The simplicity of this policy makes it less vulnerable to corruption. With a little extra cash in their pockets, recipients can feed their children and send them back to school. They can avoid a fire-sale of assets, such as a motorbike or a cow, that will help them make a living in the future. One country that has done well getting cash into poor pockets is Brazil. Various measures of poverty there have actually fallen, largely because the government has sent $110 per month for three months to the impoverished, helping 66m people. A priority for governments should be basic health care, which the pandemic has disrupted so badly that vaccination rates for children have been set back about 20 years.
The crisis requires politicians to make hard choices quickly. Mistakes are inevitable, given how much remains unknown about the disease. But some are inexcusable. One country’s sudden lockdown threw millions of migrant workers out of their urban jobs and lodgings, forcing them to head back to their villages on foot or crowded trains, spreading the virus far and wide. Another country barred people from leaving home at night but then removed from shacks (棚屋) on public land, tens of thousands who are living in a building or on land without permission or without paying rent with no place to go. Politicians governing remotely from their comfortable home offices should think harder about how their decisions might affect those whom COVID-19 is plunging back into dire poverty. It is shameful when their responses to the pandemic add to the suffering of the least fortunate.
The best title for the passage is_________.
选项
A、Poverty and Government: How COVID-19 Is Influencing All
B、Helping the Poor, What the Government Can Do
C、Governments Are to Blame
D、COVID-19 and Poverty: Failing the Poor
答案
D
解析
文章主要讲的是新冠肺炎疫情与贫困人口之间的关系,批评一些政府未出手帮助穷人在疫情冲击下有效应对贫困问题。所以选项D为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IouO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
"LookingatTheatreHistory"OneoftheprimarywaysofapproachingtheGreektheatreisthrougharcheology,thesystematics
"AnImportantLeader"QuestionLeaderslikeJohnF.KennedyandMartinLutherKinghavemadeimportantcontributionstoth
"RisingSeaLevels"Sealevelmustbeexpressedasarangeofvaluesthatareunderconstantreassessment.Duringthelastce
MassProduction:MethodandImpactP1:EvenwiththeearlysuccessesinEurope,scholarsoftechnologyattributethewidespread
RemovingDamsP1:Inthelastcentury,manyofthedamsintheUnitedStateswerebuiltforwaterdiversion,agriculture,factor
TheCosmologicalPrincipleP1:Cosmologistshypothesizedthatthedistributionofmatterintheuniverseishomogeneousandisot
1Becauseadiamondismadeofpurecarbon,ithasanimmenselystrongcrystalstructure,makingitthehardestofallminerals.
Thestudyofthepropertiesofnumbers,Platotellsus,habituatesthemindtothecontemplationofpuretruth,andraisesitab
AwardedtheNobelPrizeforphysicsin1918,GermanphysicistMaxPlanckisbestrememberedastheoriginatorofthequantumthe
A、thepaperisamemberofalargepressassociationB、thepaper’sethicalstandardsaresuspectedC、thepaperisinfinancialt
随机试题
米类加工精度是指米类去留胚的程度。
化脓性炎症组织内浸润的细胞主要是()
患儿,男,7岁。因“发音不清”前来就诊,在进行临床检查与鉴别诊断时。应考虑的疾病不包括
成人重度肥胖是指体重至少超过标准体重的
关于肩关节脱位,下列哪项是错误的()
在工程网络图中,工作K的最迟完成时间为第20天,共持续时间为6天,该工作有三项紧前工作,它们的最早完成时间分别为第8天、第10天、第12天,则工作K的总时差为( )天。
统计调查对象中,必须取得统计从业资格、持有统计从业资格证书的人员是()。
阅读以下文段.回答下列问题:1928年,英国有一位名叫森金斯的科学家在实验中发现,一些金属经过高温处理或添加某些元素之后,会变得像面团和软糖一样柔软和易于加工。只要施加很小一点压力和拉力就可以延长几倍、几十倍以至几千倍。于是,便把这种现象称之为超塑现象,
社会规律是客观的,所以社会规律不是人们自己活动的规律。()
A、Callsomebodyforhelp.B、Stayawayfromyourhouse.C、Rechargeyourcellphone.D、Turnofftheappliancesandelectronics.D短
最新回复
(
0
)