首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
122
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
What happened to the satellite?
选项
A、It stopped communicating with Earth.
B、It collided with rocks in space.
C、It lost electric power.
D、It fell out of the earth’s orbit.
答案
A
解析
本题为细节题。第一段“unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.Since then those users have been frantically trying to re—establish contact.”一句可以推断正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/J01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theytalkedforaboutanhourofthingsandpersons______theyrememberedintheschool.
Somememberssuggested______apartyforthevisitor,buttheChairmandidn’tapprove.
Livinginthenorthwestinvolvesalotofproblems,______sandstormistheworst.
Heneverhesitatestomake_____criticisms_____areconsideredhelpfultoothers.
Run,Rabbits,RunFromGreenwichtotheMallisgoodsportforallInits13years,theLondonMarathonhasacquiredapedi
Ascientistwhodoesresearchineconomicpsychologyandwhowantstopredictthewayinwhichconsumerswillspendtheirmoney
Ascientistwhodoesresearchineconomicpsychologyandwhowantstopredictthewayinwhichconsumerswillspendtheirmoney
TheEuropeanCommunitysaysitwillconsiderusingforce______isneededforpeacekeepingintheregion.
Collegestudentscaneasily______fromonecurriculumtoanother,fromoneinstitutiontoanother,assuitedtotheirneeds.
Theyear1400openedwithmorepeacefulnessthanusualinEngland.Onlyafewmonthsbefore,RichardII,weak,wicked,andtreac
随机试题
()企业的成功使得人们开始重视全面质量管理的重要性。
下列菜肴必须经过原料分割或剔骨整理的工序后才能制成的菜肴是________。
重症肺炎和轻型肺炎的区别是
一家饮料公司投资建了一座饭店,同时还拥有电器制造、汽车运输、食品加工等企业。该企业采取的是( )。
对某种特定商品有兴趣的消费者的集合是()。
某机场工程实行公开竞争性招标,招标公告中要求投标者应是具有一级资质等级的施工企业。在开标会上,共有12家参与投标的施工企业或联合体有关人员参加,此外还有市招标办公室、市公证处法律顾问以及业主方的招标委员会全体成员参加。开标前,公证处提出要对各投标单位的资质
根据马科维茨提出的理论,使投资者最满意的证券组合是()。
承办期限制度要求人们照章办事,不准人们的行为偏离规定的要求,以提升企业的()
眼手协调动作发生于()。
已知设D为由x=0、y=0及x+y=t所围成的区域,求F(t)=f(x,Y)dxdy.
最新回复
(
0
)