首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the inadequacies of the judicial system in the United States. Costs a
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the inadequacies of the judicial system in the United States. Costs a
admin
2014-01-13
70
问题
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the inadequacies of the judicial system in the United States. Costs are staggering both for the taxpayers and the litigants — and the litigants, or parties, have to wait sometimes many years before having their day in court. Many suggestions have been made concerning methods of ameliorating(改善)the situation, but as in most branches of government, changes come slowly.
One suggestion that has been made in order to maximize the efficiency of the system is to allow districts that have an overabundance of pending cases to borrow judges from other districts that do not have such a backlog. Another suggestion is to use pretrial conferences, in which the judge meets in his chambers with the litigants and their attorneys in order to narrow the issues, limit the witnesses, and provide for a more orderly trial. The theory behind pretrial conferences is that judges will spend less time on each case and parties will more readily settle before trial when they realize the adequacy of their claims and their opponents’ evidence. Unfortunately, at least one study has shown that pretrial conferences actually use more judicial time than they save, rarely result in pretrial settlements, and actually result in higher damage settlements.
Many states have now established another method, small-claims courts, in which cases over small sums of money can be disposed of with considerable dispatch. Such proceedings cost the litigants almost nothing. In California, for example, the parties must appear before the judge without the assistance of counsel. The proceedings are quite informal and there is no pleading(辩护)— the litigants need to make only a one-sentence statement of their claim. By going to this type of court, the plaintiff(原告)waives(放弃)any right to a jury trial and the right to appeal the decision.
The pretrial conference, in theory, is supposed to do all of the following except______.
选项
A、narrow the issues
B、cause early settlements
C、save judicial time
D、increase settlement costs
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。根据题干关键词pretrial conference定位到原文第二段第二句。第二段第二、三句,可以得出选项narrow the issues,cause early settlements,save judicial time所表达的信息正是实行预审制度的目的。只有选项D没有提及。故答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/J1QO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
IndustrialproductionmanagerscoordinatetheresourcesandactivitiesrequiredtoproducemillionsofgoodseveryyearintheU
Thegrowthofcell-phoneusersintheU.S.hastaperedofffromthebreakneckpaceof50%annuallyinthelate1990stowhatana
21.Wemightbeinclinedtoattributetotheactofthinkingcompletefromlanguageiftheindividualformedorwereabletoform
Consumersandproducersobviouslymakedecisionsthatmoldtheeconomy,butthereisathirdmajor【61】toconsidertheroleofg
FederalReserveBoardChairmanAlanGreenspanlaidforththeintellectualbasisforthelikelycontinuedaggressiveeasinginmo
Asthetwentiethcenturybegan,theimportanceofformaleducationintheUnitedStatesincreased.Thefrontierhadmostlydisap
Amongthemostpowerfulenginesofmoderneconomicgrowthhavebeentechnologicalchangesthatraiseoutputrelativetoinputs.
Our______withthePresidentattheairportwasexciting.
______throughtheatticandseeifyoucanfindanythingforthejumblesale.
随机试题
设向量a=(1,m,2),b=(2,4,n),若a∥b,则().
社区健康教育的对象不包括
郁证总的治则是
胃大部切除后第1天应注意观察的并发症是
甲自书遗嘱将所有遗产全部留给长子乙.并明确次子丙不能继承。乙与丁婚后育有一女戊、一子己。后乙、丁遇车祸,死亡先后时间不能确定。甲悲痛成疾,不久去世。丁母健在。下列哪些表述是正确的?(2013年卷三第66题)
生产者:食物链:生物学
查找幻灯片中第2个“生活”内容。
三种基本的程序控制结构中,【】是按照程序语句行的自然顺序,依次执行语句。
U.S.lightcrudeforSeptemberdeliverysettledat$47.27,up52cents,ontheNewYorkMercantile.Exchange,thenroseanother
更有一些教师甚至资助家境贫寒的学生完成他们的学业。(needystudents)
最新回复
(
0
)