首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance,
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance,
admin
2019-08-01
62
问题
[A]The sort of faulty thinking called motivated reasoning also blocks our search for truth but advances arguments. For instance, we tend to look harder for flaws in a study when we don’t agree with its conclusions and are more critical of evidence that undermines our point of view. So birthers dismiss evidence offered by Hawaiian officials that Obama’s birth certificate is real, and death-penalty foes are adept at finding flaws in studies that conclude capital punishment deters crime. While motivated reasoning may cloud our view of reality and keep us from objectively assessing evidence, Mercier says, by letting us to accept flaws(real or not)in that evidence it prepares us to mount a destroying strategy in arguments.
[B]Another form of flawed reasoning shows up in logic puzzles. Consider the syllogism "No C are B; all B are A; therefore some A are not C. " Is it true? Fewer than 10 percent of us figure out that it is. One reason is that to evaluate its validity requires constructing counterexamples(finding an A that is a C, for instance). But finding counterexamples can, in general, invent our confidence in our own arguments.
[C]Women are bad drivers, Saddam plotted 9-11, Obama was not born in America, and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction: to believe any of these requires stopping some of our critical-thinking faculties and succumbing instead to the kind of irrationality that drives the logically minded crazy. It helps, for instance, to use confirmation bias. It also helps not to test your beliefs against empirical data; not to subject beliefs to the plausibility test; and to be guided by emotion.
[D]Even the sunk-cost fallacy, which has tripped up everyone from supporters of a losing war to a losing stock, reflects reasoning that turns its back on logic but wins arguments because the emotions it appeals to are universal. If Mercier is right, the sunk-cost fallacy, confirmation bias, and the other forms of irrationality will be with us as long as humans like to argue. That is, forever.
[E]An idea sweeping through the ranks of philosophers and cognitive scientists suggests why this is so. The reason we succumb to confirmation bias, why we are blind to counterexamples, and why we fall short of Cartesian logic in so many other ways is that these oversights have a purpose: they help us " invent and evaluate arguments that are intended to persuade other people," says psychologist Hugo Mercier of the University of Pennsylvania. Failures of logic, he propose, are in fact effective arms to win arguments. That puts poor reasoning in a completely different light. Arguing, after all, is less about seeking truth than about overcoming opposing views. So while confirmation bias, for instance, may mislead us about what’s true and real, by letting examples that support our view monopolize our memory and perception, it maximizes the arms we use when trying to convince someone that, say, he really is "late all the time. "
[F]Forms of reasoning that are good for solving problems and winning arguments lose out, over the course of evolution. In fact, rationality refers to the success of goal attainment, whatever those goals may be. Sometimes, rationality is equated with behavior that is self-interested to the point of being selfish. Sometimes rationality implies having complete knowledge about all the details of a given situation.
[G]The fact that humans are subject to all these failures of rational thought seems to make no sense. Reason is supposed to be the highest achievement of the human mind, and the route to knowledge and wise decisions. But as psychologists have been documenting since the 1960s, humans are really, really bad at reasoning. It’s not just that we follow our emotions so often, in contexts from voting to ethics. No, even when we intend to deploy the full force of our rational faculties, we often failed.
Order:
选项
答案
D
解析
上文提到有一种被称作动机性推理的错误思考同样阻碍着我们寻求真理,但是却促进了争辩,并且举例进行说明。在剩下的[D]项和[F]项中,[D]项讨论的是理性思考背离逻辑但是赢得了争辩,和上文可以顺利衔接,并且最后指出:只要人类还愿意争辩,沉没成本谬论、证实性偏见以及其他形式的非理性思考会一直伴随着人类,直到永远。也符合文章的结尾,因此[D]项正确。[F]项提到Forms of reasoning,但是后面一直在定义理性(rationality),因此可以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JB2Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
FormonthsTwitter,themicro-bloggingservice,hasreceivedthekindoffreeattentionofwhichmostcompaniescanonlydream.
Itisagoodtimetobeafisherman.Theglobalfish-priceindexoftheUN’sFoodandAgriculturalOrganization(FAO)hitareco
Americanpresidentsseemtoagebeforeoureyes.Butthecommonbeliefthathigh-officestressgraysourleadersfasterthan【C1】
Americanpresidentsseemtoagebeforeoureyes.Butthecommonbeliefthathigh-officestressgraysourleadersfasterthan【C1】
Americanpresidentsseemtoagebeforeoureyes.Butthecommonbeliefthathigh-officestressgraysourleadersfasterthan【C1】
Theshortergrowingseasonsexpectedwithclimatechangeoverthenext40yearswillendangerhundredsofmillionsofalreadypo
Theshortergrowingseasonsexpectedwithclimatechangeoverthenext40yearswillendangerhundredsofmillionsofalreadypo
Theshortergrowingseasonsexpectedwithclimatechangeoverthenext40yearswillendangerhundredsofmillionsofalreadypo
Hewaspunished______heshouldmakethesamemistakeagain.
Criticismandself-criticismisnecessary______ithelpsustofindandcorrectourmistakes.
随机试题
A.非甾类抗炎药B.合成雌激素代用品C.孕激素类药物D.雄激素类药物E.肾上腺皮质激素类药物黄体酮属于
贮藏中易泛油的药材有
A.腹痛B.黑便C.皮炎D.性功能减退E.便秘枸橼酸铋钾所致的主要不良反应是()。
【背景资料】某群体工程,主楼地下2层,地上8层,总建筑面积26800m2,现浇钢筋混凝土框架结构,建设单位分别与施工单位、监理单位按照《建设工程施工合同(示范文本)》(GF一2013—0201)、《建设工程监理合同(示范文本)》(GF一20
财政直接支付的中请由一级预算单位汇总,填写《财政直接支付申清书》,报财政部同库支付执行机构。()
某酒厂2016年1月份生产一种新的粮食白酒,广告样品使用0.4吨,已知该种白酒无同类产品出厂价,生产成本为每吨42000元,成本利润率为10%,白酒定额税率为每500克0.5元,比例税率为20%。该酒厂当月应缴纳的消费税为()元。
最早提出“什么知识具有价值”的是()。
民法典的编纂模式主要有
已知函数f(x)=在x=0处连续,求未知参数a的值。
Whatisthemainideaofthenewsitem?
最新回复
(
0
)