首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2016-01-30
35
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
What does " the snark review" refer to according to Heidi Julavits?
选项
A、Cultural reviews which are unfriendly and selfless.
B、Literary reviews avoiding serious criticism.
C、Entertainment reviews in the film industry.
D、Postmodern reviews independent of objectivity.
答案
A
解析
细节判断题。根据题干信息定位到原文第四段尾句。此句中的She指代Heidi Julavits,原句中的hostile,self-serving与选项A中的unfriendly,selfless对应。故答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JGGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thegovernment’spoliciesinthepastfiveyearshaveshowna(n)______inemphasizingthenecessityofimprovingthepeasants’li
Asforthemissingfunds,thecompanymanager,whendemandedtogiveanexplanation,couldnotevencomeupwitha______one.(北京大
(复旦大学2011年试题)Aconsiderableamountofmedicalresearchisaimedatidentifyingriskfactorsfordisease.Therationalebehi
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
Thegovernmentclaimedthatitwasaccidental,butthehollowand______excusecouldnotconvincethepublic.(复旦大学2010年试题)
我们清楚地认识到,中国人口多,底子薄,城乡、区域发展不平行,资源环境约束强化,就业压力增加,脱贫任务仍然很重。中国已经制定了未来五年经济社会发展的蓝图,我们坚持以科学发展为主题,以加快转变经济发展方式为主线,深化改革开放,保障民生,促进经济长期平衡较快发展
Anumberofresearchershavewrittenabouta"hiddencurriculum"inschools,definedasthesubtleinfluencesonstudentsthatr
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【C1】______andattractsoverthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itw
美国联邦政府的立法部门由两院组成。参议院由100名(每州两名),众议院有435名议员。每一议员代表各州之选举区,根据最高法院规定,各选区人口须略相等。众议员须年满25岁以上,且是该州的居民,并且己为美国公民7年,经由两年一期的普选产生。参议员须年满30岁,
Thewaypeopleholdtothebeliefthatafunfilled,painfreelifeequalshappinessactuallyreducestheirchancesofeverattai
随机试题
下列不属于我国艺术家张艺谋执导的电影是______。
混凝土质量配合比为1:1.95:3.52:0.58(水泥:砂子:石子:水),则当水泥质量为336kg时,对应的石子质量约为()kg。
我国《公民道德建设实施纲要》提出了职业道德的基本内容,其中,职业道德的基础是()。
在班杜拉看来,学会的行为未必表现出来,这取决于
“五位一体”总体布局,既是路线图,也是任务书,()是根本、政治建设是保障、文化建设是灵魂、()是条件、()是基础。①经济建设②生态文明建设③社会建设
电影《泰坦尼克号》和歌剧《罗密欧与朱丽叶》因歌颂纯真的爱情而为世人所熟知,我国的爱情名著《牡丹亭》以舞剧形式在美国上演,也为美国观众所欣赏。这些美丽动人的爱情故事都深深打动着世界各地的人们。这说明()。
EgyptianwinehasanextensivehistorywithinthehistoryofEgypfiancivilization.Grapeswerenot【C1】______tothelandscapeof
有以下程序(提示,程序中fseek(fp,-2L*sizeof(int),SEEK_END);语句的作用是使位置指针从文件末尾向前移2*sizeof(int)字节):#include<stdio.h>main(){FILE
调用下面子过程,消息框显示的值是SubSFun()Dimx,y,mx=10:y=100IfyModxThenm=xElsem=yEndIfMsgBoxmEndSub
【T1】Whiletherearealmostasmanydefinitionsofhistoryastherearehistorians,modernpracticemostcloselyconformstoone
最新回复
(
0
)