首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2016-01-30
52
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
What does " the snark review" refer to according to Heidi Julavits?
选项
A、Cultural reviews which are unfriendly and selfless.
B、Literary reviews avoiding serious criticism.
C、Entertainment reviews in the film industry.
D、Postmodern reviews independent of objectivity.
答案
A
解析
细节判断题。根据题干信息定位到原文第四段尾句。此句中的She指代Heidi Julavits,原句中的hostile,self-serving与选项A中的unfriendly,selfless对应。故答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JGGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Tofightagainstcomputercrimes,acomputersystemneedsasurewayofidentifyingitsrightusersandrejectingthosewhoare
Evenwhentextbooksare______throughaschoolsystem,methodsofteachingmayvarygreatly.
Writeanessayabout200wordsasyouranswertothefollowingquestion:"ShouldtheChinesegovernmentpaymoreattentionand
Despitealltherefinementsofsubtletyandthedogmatismoflearning,itisbythecommonsenseandcompassionofreaderswhich
Withaneighty-hourweekandlittleenjoyment,lifemusthavebeenvery______forthenineteenth-centuryfactoryworkers.
Schoolbuildingsthemselvescanreflectliberalorconservativeviewsaboutwhatshouldgooninaclassroom.Theearliestschoo
Cosmopolitanismisconcernedtodisclosetheethical,cultural,andlegalbasisofpoliticalorderinaworldwherepoliticalco
仪容整洁和个人卫生的讲究已经行之有年了。很难想象一个人们不在乎打理外表和身体清洁的时代。或许这些卫生习惯始于亚当(Adam)第一次洗澡梳头去赴夏娃的约;也可能始于夏娃(Eve)第一次搽上青草制的化妆品使自己更美丽。无论是从何时开始的,仪容整洁与个人卫生已经
Publicspeakingfillsmostpeoplewithdread.Humiliationisgreatestfear;self-exposureandfailingtoappealtotheaudience
随机试题
两根纤细、闪亮的铁轨延伸过来了。它勇敢地盘旋在山腰,又悄悄地试探着前进,弯弯曲曲,曲曲弯弯,终于绕到台儿沟脚下,然后钻进幽暗的隧道,冲向又一道山梁,朝着神秘的远方奔去。这景象有何象征意味?
男性,35岁,右膝关节内侧疼痛、肿胀半年,曾在外院摄X线片。见右胫骨上端内侧有一5cm×4cm大小透光区,中间有肥皂泡沫状阴影。骨端膨大。近1个月来肿胀明显加重,夜间疼痛难忍,右膝关节活动受限。入院后X线摄片示胫骨上端病变扩大,肥皂泡沫状阴影消失,呈云雾状
作为医技人员,下列做法错误的是
男性,40岁,发热待查收治入院。入院后患者意识清楚,但精神萎靡,全身消瘦。为保证检验标本质量,不正确的是
可索赔的损失索赔费用包括()。
其他条件不变的情况下,企业财务风险大,投资者要求的预期报酬率就高,企业筹资的资本成本相应就大。()
下列权利中,属于合同中的债权人根据《合同法》享有的保全措施的有( )。
下列关于钢表述错误的是:
常言道:“人要实,火要虚。”此话的意思是说做人要脚踏实地,才能事业有成;可燃物要架空一些,才能燃烧更旺。“火要虚”的目的是:
下列有关社会主义法律与社会主义道德的表述,不正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)