首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
admin
2012-11-20
50
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad as or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933 there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down abolished by an amendment (修正案) to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever-- often poisonous alcohol.
On December 5th, 1993 they repealed (撤销) prohibition by ratifying (批准) the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
During prohibition, illegal alcohol was ______.
选项
A、sold openly
B、no longer a temptation
C、a major factor in the passage of the Volstead Act
D、brought across the Mexican and Canadian borders
答案
D
解析
由第三段中“They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders”,可知答案是D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JLeC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Youmaytakethemallhome______.
Wewent______ourplancarefullybeforewecarrieditout.
Three______fourpeoplebelievethathavinghealthyteethisveryimportant.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowaridcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorres
OneeveningMr.Greenwasdrivinghomealongalonelycountryroad.Hehad£100.00inhispocket.Attheloneliestpartofthe
Television,itisoftensaid,keepsone【36】aboutcurrentevents,allowsonetofollowthe【37】developmentinscienceandpolitics
Television,itisoftensaid,keepsone【36】aboutcurrentevents,allowsonetofollowthe【37】developmentinscienceandpolitics
Television,itisoftensaid,keepsone【36】aboutcurrentevents,allowsonetofollowthe【37】developmentinscienceandpolitics
A、stopB、programC、soulD、belowA画线部分读[c],其他选项的画线部分读[eu]。
随机试题
(2019年莱州)小学教育的根本任务就是打好基础,即要求学好语文、数学,打好读、写、算的基础;全面推进素质教育,为全面发展打下基础。这是指()
无牙颌牙槽嵴终身持续吸收,一般每年为
2013年7月2日,甲公司向乙公司订购一套总价值150万元的精密仪器设备,双方签订了买卖合同,约定由乙公司代办托运,7月8日,甲公司为筹集购买精密仪器设备的货款向丙公司借款100万元,双方签订了借款合同,约定借款期限为3个月,由丁公司和戊公司分别提供担保。
江某是宏海经贸公司的法定代表人。2013年6月至2015年1月,江某通过王某以2万元价格从外地某公司购买增值税专用发票75份,涉及税款将近160万元,并已全部抵扣。2014年6月至2016年2月,在没有货物交易的情况下,江某以宏海经贸公司名义向7家公司开具
根据《中华人民共和国合同法》的规定,当事人互负债务,有先后履行顺序,先履行一方未履行的,后履行一方有权拒绝其履行要求。该项权利是()。
教材包括()
我国公安工作的基本方针,完整地表述了公安工作与()之间的关系。
某微型计算机的地址总线的位数是16位,最大的寻址空间可为()。
以下程序的运行结果是()。#includevoidsub(intx,inty,int*z){*z=y-x;)voidmain(){inta,b,C;sub(10,5,&a);sub(7
Thesalesmanisdemonstratingthenewfaxmachinetoacustomer.
最新回复
(
0
)