首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
There is a substantial body of evidence showing that HIV causes AIDS—and that antiretroviral treatment (ART) has turned the vira
There is a substantial body of evidence showing that HIV causes AIDS—and that antiretroviral treatment (ART) has turned the vira
admin
2019-08-17
24
问题
There is a substantial body of evidence showing that HIV causes AIDS—and that antiretroviral treatment (ART) has turned the viral infection from a death sentence into a chronic disease. Yet a small group of AIDS denialists keeps alive the conspiratorial argument that ART is harmful and that HIV science has been corrupted by commercial interests. Unfortunately, AIDS denialist have had a disproportionate effect on efforts to stem the AIDS epidemic. In 2000, South African President Thabo Mbeki took these claims seriously, opting to debate the issue, thus delaying the introduction of ART into the South African public health sector. At least 330,000 South Africans died unnecessarily as a result.
The "hero scientist" of AIDS denialism, University of California, Berkeley, virologist Peter Dues-berg, argues that HIV is a harmless passenger virus and that ART is toxic, even a cause of AIDS. He has done no clinical research on HIV and ignores the many rebuttals of his claims in the scientific literature. In 1993, John Maddox, then editor of Nature, complained that Duesberg was "wrongly using tendentious arguments to confuse understanding of AIDS," and that because he was not engaging as a scientist, he would no longer be granted an automatic "right of reply. "
More recently, in 2009, ADIS activists and HIV scientists, including Nobel Laureate Francoise Barre-Sinoussi, complained to Elsevier, the publisher of Medical Hypotheses, when that journal published a paper by Duesberg defending Mbeki and denying the existence of the African AIDS epidemic. Medical Hypotheses had a policy against peer review, so Elsevier asked The Lancet to oversee a peer review of the paper. When the panel of reviewers unanimously recommended rejection, Elsevier permanently withdrew it and forced Medical Hypotheses to introduce peer review. Last December Duesberg published a reworked version in an Italian journal, sparking further controversy and protests from the journal’s editorial board, one of whom has already resigned.
Efforts by scientists to defend science are supplemented by pro-science activists operating on the Internet. Physician, author, and blogger Ben Goldacre argued in his Guardian column Bad Science that a "ragged band of bloggers from all walks of life" has been very successful at exposing pseudo-scientific claims and cheating alternative practitioners selling quack cures. The Internet now poses a double-edged sword for AIDS denialists. It is becoming a tougher place for people to segregate themselves in a comfortable cocoon of the like-minded. While the web allows denialists to advertise their ideas and build networks, it also exposes potential converts to scientific rebuttals of their claims, as well news about the deaths of the "living icons" —high-profile HIV-positive people who rejected ART.
The key living icon for AIDS denialism was Christine Maggiore. She founded Alive & Well AIDS Alternatives (an organization with Duesberg on its board), campaigned against the use of ART to prevent mothers passing HIV to their babies, and met President Mbeki. Despite her 3-year-old daughter’s succumbing to AIDS, Maggiore remained firmly opposed to HIV science and ART. She opted for alternative therapies and died at the age of 52, from AIDS-related infections.
Scientists often have a tough time responding to anti-science conspiracy theories because their integrity is attacked by the conspiratorial moves made against them. But precisely because living icons like Maggiore lent confidence to AIDS denialism by appearing to offer "living proof" that the science of HIV pathogenesis and treatment is wrong, pro-science activists maintain a list of denialists who have died of AIDS. The weapons of science and reason are still very much in contention, but the gloves have come off in a broader struggle over credibility.
In the author’s view, living icons like Maggiore serve in the HIV science as________.
选项
A、a powerful weapon
B、a double-edged sword
C、a feeble angel
D、a wicked devil
答案
B
解析
事实细节题。第四段末句指出,活象征是艾滋病否定主义的活证明,有力的反驳了HIV科学;但由于活象征相继死亡,也在一定程度上否定了艾滋病否定主义,这对HIV科学来说无疑是有利的。第五段叙述了活象征Maggiore(玛乔丽)的事例,由于她反对HIV科学和ART的使用,导致自己和女儿都死于艾滋病。所以活象征既挑战了HIV科学,也为其提供了活生生的依据,所以活象征在HIV科学中的作用是双面的,故答案为B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JVra777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thejudgeruledthattheevidencewasinadmissibleonthegroundsthatitwas______totheissueathand.
Thereissubstantialevidencethatby1926,withthepublicationofTheWearyBlues,LangstonHugheshadbrokenwithtwowell-es
Nearlyacenturyago,biologistsfoundthatiftheyseparatedaninvertebrateanimalembryointotwopartsatanearlystageof
Nearlyacenturyago,biologistsfoundthatiftheyseparatedaninvertebrateanimalembryointotwopartsatanearlystageof
Nearlyacenturyago,biologistsfoundthatiftheyseparatedaninvertebrateanimalembryointotwopartsatanearlystageof
Ithasbeenrecognizedthatthecausesofprematurebirthsaremultifarious,andithasbeenspeculatedthatenvironmental______
Ihadneverseensomanypeoplewithsomanydisabilities.Ireturnedhome,silendy______,thinkinghowfortunatewereallywere
A______smilethatinthenextminuteturnedintoanembarrassedblush.
随机试题
《素问》"大毒治病,十去其六"中的"毒"是指
故意犯罪停止形态
某工程项目在第0年初投资1000万元,第1~4年度每年的收入分别为:500万元、450万元、360万元、280万元。若折现率为10%,该工程的净现值为( )万元。
会计法将()作为首要的立法宗旨。
优先认股权是指老股东可根据其持有发行公司股份的数量,按持有时间长短优先认购增发的新股的权利。( )
甲、乙、丙三人设立A普通合伙企业,约定甲出资4万元,乙出资3万元,丙出资3万元。三人按4:3:3的比例分配和分担合伙损益。A企业成立后,与B公司签订购货合同。保证人为丁。后因A企业无力偿还货款,B公司要求丁承担保证责任,丁以未约定保证形式,只承担一般保证责
A股是以人民币标明面值、以人民币认购和进行交易、供()买卖的股票。
有人认为:“在合同关系中,只要一方当事人将合同主体变更的事实通知另一方当事人,就会发生合同主体变更的法律效力”。请运用债的变更理论对该说法加以辨析。
JustliketheMooninasolareclipse,theplanetVenuswillimposeitselfforafewbriefhoursexactlybetweentheEarthandt
Inthissection,youaregoingtoreadapassagewithtenstatementsattachedtoit.Eachstatementcontainsinformationgiveni
最新回复
(
0
)