首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
admin
2012-01-21
77
问题
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Between 1993 and 1997 in New York city violent crime fell by 39% in central Harlem and by 45% in the once-terrifying South Bronx. The latest figures released by the FBI, for 1997, show that serious crime continued to fall in all the larger cities, though a little more slowly than in 1996.
Violent crime fell by 5% in all and by slightly more in cities with over 250,000 people. Property crimes have fallen, too, by more than 20% since 1980, so that the rates for burglary and car-theft are lower in America than they are in supposedly more law-abiding Britain and Scandinavia. And people have noticed. In 1994, 31% of Americans told pollsters that crime was the most important challenge facing the country, while in 1997, only 14% thought so. Some cities’ police departments are so impressed by these figures, it is said, that they have lately taken to exaggerating the plunge in crime.
Why this has happened is anyone’s guess. Many factors — social, demographic, economic, and political — affect crime rate, so it is difficult to put a finger on the vital clue. In March this year, the FBI itself admitted it had "no idea" why rates were falling so fast.
Politicians think they know, of course. Ask Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York, why his city has made such strides in beating crime that it accounts for fully a quarter of the national decline. He will cite his policy of "zero tolerance". This concept, which sprang from a famous article by two criminologists in Atlantic Monthly in March 1982, maintains that by refusing to tolerate tiny infractions of the law — dropping litter, spray — painting walls — the authorities can create a climate in which crime of more dangerous kinds finds it impossible to flourish. The Atlantic article was called "Broken Windows"; if one window in a building was left broken, it argued, all the others would soon be gone. The answer: mend the window, fast.
The metro system in Washington, D.C was the first place where zero tolerance drew public attention, especially when one passenger was arrested for eating a banana. The policy seemed absurdly pernickety, yet it worked: in a better environment, people’s behavior improved, and crime dropped. Mr. Giuliani, taking this theme to heart, has gone further. He has cracked down on windscreen-cleaners, public urinates, graffiti, and even jaywalkers. He has excoriated New York’s famously sullen cabdrivers, and wants all New Yorkers to be nicer to each other. Tony Blair, visiting from London, has been hugely impressed.
But is this cleanliness and civility the main reason why crime has fallen? It seems unlikely "Zero tolerance" can also be a distraction, making too many policemen spend too much time handing out littering tickets and parking fines while, some streets away, young men are being murdered for their trainers. It is localized, too: though lower Manhattan or the Washington metro can show the uncanny orderliness of a communist regime, other parts of the city — the areas of highest crime maybe left largely untreated.
William Bratton, New York’s police commissioner until Mr. Giuliani fired him for stealing his thunder, has a different explanation for the fall in crime. It came about mostly, he believes, because he reorganized the police department and restored its morale: giving his officers better guns, letting them take more decisions for themselves, and moving them away from desk jobs and out into the struts. Mr. Bratton made his precinct commanders personally responsible for reducing crimes on their own beats. There was no passing the buck, and those who failed were fired. Within a year, he had replaced half of them.
According to the passage, what are the main reasons for the falling of the crime rates?
选项
A、Social and demographic factors.
B、The efforts of FBI.
C、The policy of zero tolerance.
D、It is difficult to find the vital clue.
答案
D
解析
从第六段开始作者来分析犯罪率下降的原因,从作者所引用的原因,以及作 者的遣词造句中可以判断出很难说哪个原因是最为关键和重要的,因此D是该题的答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JhXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
EvenIntelligentPeopleCanFail1Thestrikingthingabouttheinnovatorswhosucceededinmakingourmodernworldishow
RonaldKahnandhiscolleaguescanmakemicelivelongerbyWhatcanbeinferredfromthepassageabouttheroutetolonglife?
ThepassagetellsusthatasachildgrowsupWelearnfromthepassagethatachildhasboundlesscuriosity
It’salmost5o’clock,timetoquit.
TheOldGateIntheMiddleAgesthevastmajorityofEuropeancitieshadwallsaroundthem.Thiswaspartlyfordefensive【C1
TheOldGateIntheMiddleAgesthevastmajorityofEuropeancitieshadwallsaroundthem.Thiswaspartlyfordefensive【C1
Themainideaofthepassageisabout______.Theword"desalination"inthelastsentencemaymean______.
Themainideaofthepassageisabout______.Theword"it"inline2refersto______.
ProfessorMeredithThring,ProfessorofMechanicalEngineeringatQueenMaryCollege,Londonshowedoffhislatestinventionto
WhatwasSteve’sattitudetowardswomenwhowrotelovestories?WhatwereHelen’sfeelingsaboutthemovefromLondontoStrett
随机试题
在PowerPoint2010中,要实现在播放时幻灯片之间的跳转,可采用的方法是_____。
轻度先天性上睑下垂行手术矫治的时间宜在
血清清蛋白明显降低可见于
关于血药浓度下列叙述不正确的是
根据热稳定条件,未考虑腐蚀时,接地装置接地极的截面不宜小于连接至该接地装置接地线截面的()。
工程项目的管理模式有()。
通过分析过去三个月内英镑对美元的汇率,得到汇率均值为1英镑=1.64美元,汇率波动标准差为250个基点。假设英镑对美元的汇率波动基本符合正态分布,则预期未来三个月中。英镑兑美元的汇率有95%的可能性处于()之间。
一天,一个外国旅游团同时入住北京一家饭店,行李进房后,一游客找到地陪说,他的行李找不到了,应在下述地方帮助寻找行李()。
Themostobviouspurposeofadvertisingistoinformtheconsumerofavailableproductsorservices.Thesecond【C1】______isto
陕西菜虽然没有名列全国的八大菜系之一,但作为千年古都、历史名城,餐饮风格自成一体,具有浓郁的地方特色。陕西饮食,凭借着历史古都的优势,挖掘继承历代宫廷美食之技艺,博采全国各地之精华,以品种繁多、地方风味各异、古色古香古韵而著称。至今很多都保留周、秦、汉、唐
最新回复
(
0
)