首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
73
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
To hold the reader’s interest, the author______.
选项
A、used quotations by famous people
B、asks frequent questions
C、presents many research statistics
D、tells many amusing stories
答案
B
解析
通读全文可知,作者通过提出一系列的问题来写此文,由此来引起读者的兴趣。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Lovecan’tconquerall.So,beforecouplestietheknot,theyshouldknowwhatthey’regettinginto.Thetabooagainstcouplesl
Thebiosphereisthenamebiologistsgivetothesortofskinonthesurfaceofthisplanetthatisinhabitablebylivingorgani
RealPolicemenhardlyrecognizeanyresemblancebetweentheirlivesandwhattheyseeonTV.Thefirstdifferenceisthata
Criticismwithoutsuggestingareasofimprovementisnot______andshouldbeavoidedifpossible.
Whydoesstorytellingendureacrosstimeandcultures?Perhapstheanswerliesinourevolutionaryroots.Astudyofthewaytha
Towhatextentaretheunemployedfailingintheirdutytosocietytowork,andhowfarhastheStateanobligationtoensureth
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresour
Threeweeksafterthesuicidebombing,thepolicewerestillhuntingforbombersfortheybelievemorewere____.
IntheUnitedStates,thefirstdaynurserywasopenedin1854.Nurserieswereestablishedinvariousareasduringthe【51】halfo
Thebusinessofadvertisingistoinventmethodsofaddressingmassiveaudiencesinalanguagedesignedtobeeasilyaccessible
随机试题
InBritain,peoplehavedifferentattitudestothepolice.Mostpeoplegenerally【C1】______themandthejobtheydo—althoughthe
A.了解胆囊浓缩和吸收功能B.明确肝内病变的范围和性质C.了解梗阻性黄疸的部位D.可显示胆道系统和胰管E.了解胆道术后胆道系统的情况口服胆囊造影可
对比度、X线质、X线量的关系,错误的是
男性,62岁,间歇性无痛性肉眼血尿4个月,伴蚯蚓状血块,膀胱镜检查:膀胱内未见肿瘤,见右输尿管口喷血,B超可见右肾轻度积水,下列最佳的检查方法是
张某,女,28岁,产后恶露不止近日出现项背强急,四肢抽搐,头目昏眩,自汗,神疲,气短,舌淡红,脉弦细。治疗方剂宜选
周航、朱元以色情为诱饵索取、敲诈他人钱财,是构成抢劫罪还是敲诈勒索罪?对周航、朱元应如何处罚?
人工智能技术在医学领域的应用越来越广泛,例如MYCI系统可以帮助医生对住院的血液感染患者进行诊断并选用抗菌素类药物进行治疗,这是运用人工智能技术中的()。
简述我国口腔颌面外科的成就有哪些?
以下说法中正确的是()。
Whatisonethingtheapartmentbuildingwhichthewomandescribesdoesnothave?
最新回复
(
0
)