首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
87
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
To hold the reader’s interest, the author______.
选项
A、used quotations by famous people
B、asks frequent questions
C、presents many research statistics
D、tells many amusing stories
答案
B
解析
通读全文可知,作者通过提出一系列的问题来写此文,由此来引起读者的兴趣。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Aman-madechemicalthatattractsmalegypsymothsbyduplicatingthenaturalattractantoffemalegypsymothshasbeenpatented
Thestudyofsocialscienceismorethanthestudyoftheindividualsocialsciences.Althoughitistruethattobeagoodsoci
Oneofthemajordifferencesbetweenmanandhisclosestlivingrelativeis,ofcourse,thatthechimpanzeehasnotdevelopedthe
Perhapsthemoststrikingqualityofsatiricliteratureisitsfreshness,itsoriginalityofperspective.Satirerarelyofferso
Throughoutthehistoryoflife,speciesoflivingcreatureshavemadeuseofchemicalenergybytheslowcombinationofcertain
Atdusk,Mr.Hightowerwouldsitinhisoldarmchairinthebackyardandwistfullyloseinreminiscenceofhisyouthromances.
Itisoftenobservedthattheagedspendmuchtimethinkingandtalkingabouttheirpastlives,【71】aboutthefuture.Theseremin
Youcouldbe______manydangersbytravelingaloneinthatarea.
随机试题
关于膈神经,下列说法正确的是()。
下列对学生的品德结构的叙述正确的是()。
C5~C7椎间盘病变在行牵引时,正确的方法是
一个人在科室里是和事佬,做事不紧不慢,逆来顺受,荣辱不惊。是什么气质类型
患者胸脘痞闷,按之则痛,咳痰黄稠,舌苔黄腻,脉滑数。经辨证,用清气化痰丸治疗。判断方中君药的主要依据是
一天晚上,甲去电影院看电影。电影开始放映后,坐在甲后一排的乙、丙二人不停地说笑、打闹。甲按捺不住,起身回头指责二人。三人发生争吵,乙、丙二人对甲大打出乎。甲情急中掏出随身携带的水果刀往前乱刺,结果刺中坐在乙旁边的观众丁,致丁重伤。甲的行为属于:()
投资的成本可以理解为()
下列哪一项不属于对杭州市的赞誉?()
2010年,我国的专利申请总量为122.2万件,同比增长25.1%。在2010年的三类专利申请中,发明专利申请39.1万件,较上年增长24.4%,占专利申请总量的32.0%;实用新型专利申请41.0万件,较上年增长31.9%,占专利申请总量的33.5%;外
计算下列定积分:
最新回复
(
0
)