首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
68
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
To hold the reader’s interest, the author______.
选项
A、used quotations by famous people
B、asks frequent questions
C、presents many research statistics
D、tells many amusing stories
答案
B
解析
通读全文可知,作者通过提出一系列的问题来写此文,由此来引起读者的兴趣。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
NexttoSirAndrewintheclub-roomsitsCaptainSentry,agentlemanofgreatcourage,goodunderstanding,butinvinciblemodest
Forlaymenethnologyisthemostinterestingofthebiologicalsciencesfortheveryreasonthatitconcernsanimalsintheirno
Recentlythecarfactoryhadtocarryoutpersonnel______becauseoffinancialtrouble.
Oneofthemajordifferencesbetweenmanandhisclosestlivingrelativeis,ofcourse,thatthechimpanzeehasnotdevelopedthe
Thepolice______toemergenciesinjustafewminuteswhentheaccidenthappened.
Allanimalsmustrest,butdotheyreallysleepasweknowit?Theanswertothisquestionseemsobvious,Ifananimalregularl
WiththeUSeconomyslowingdown,layoffsareeverywhere.Noindustryisspared.Ifyouenduphavingtostartover,inaddition
ThesinglebusinessofHenryThoreau,duringforty-oddyearsofeageractivity,wastodiscoveralleconomycalculatedtoprovid
Whentraveling,youareadvisedtotaketraveler’schecks,whichprovideasecure______tocarryingyourmoneyincash.
随机试题
对于下列哪项情形的具体行政行为,人民法院可作出撤销判断。()
DNA连接酶催化的化学反应能够
关于尿素循环的叙述,下列哪项是错误的
老年人夜间安静睡眠时易出现脑血栓,原因是
进入20世纪后,资本主义法()。
下列关于资金时间价值的论述中,不正确的是()。
某人向同一目标独立重复射击,每次射击命中目标的概率为p(0<p<1),则此人第四次射击恰好第二次命中目标的概率为()。
人的本质是()。
定义:①心境是一种比较持久的、微弱的、影响人的整个精神活动的情绪状态。②激情是一种强烈的、短暂的,然而是爆发式的情绪状态。③应激是在出乎意料的紧急情况下所引起的情绪状态。典型例证:(1)怒发冲冠,凭栏处潇潇
在经历了全球范围的股市暴跌的冲击以后,T国政府宣称,它所经历的这场股市暴跌的冲击,是由于最近国内一些企业过快的非国有化造成的。以下哪项,如果事实上是可操作的,最有利于评价T国政府的上述宣称?
最新回复
(
0
)