首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the devel
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the devel
admin
2011-03-14
53
问题
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the development of the importance of money. Marriages based exclusively upon economic motives have not only existed in all periods and at all stages of development, but are particularly common a-mong primitive groups and conditions where they do not cause any offence at all. The disparagement of personal dignity that nowadays arises in every marriage that is not based on personal affection-so that a sense of decency requires the concealment of economic motives-does not exist in simpler cultures. The reason for this development is that increasing individualization makes it increasingly contradictory and discreditable to enter into purely individual relationships for other than purely individual reasons.
For nowadays the choice of a partner in marriage is no longer determined by social motives (though regard for the offspring may be considered to be such a motive) , in so far as society does not insist upon the couple, s equal social status-a condition, however, that provides a great deal of latitude and only rarely leads to conflicts between individual and social interests. In a quite undifferentiated society it may be relatively irrelevant who marries whom, irrelevant not only for the mutual relationship of the couple but also for the offspring. This is because where the constitutions, state of health, temperament, internal and external forms of life and orientations are largely the same within the group, the chance that the children will turn out well depends less upon whether the parents agree and complement each other than it does in highly differentiated society. It therefore seems quite natural and expedient that the choice of the partner should be determined by reasons other than purely individual affection. Yet personal attraction should be decisive in a highly individualized society where a harmonious relationship between two individuals becomes increasingly rare.
The declining frequency of marriage which is to be found everywhere in highly civilized cultural circumstances is undoubtedly due, in part, to the fact that highly differentiated people in general have difficulty in finding a completely sympathetic complement to themselves. Yet we do not possess any other criterion and indication for the advisability of marriage except mutual instinctive attraction. But, happiness is a purely personal matter, decided upon entirely by the couple themselves, and there would be no compelling reason for the official insistence on at least pretending love may be misleading—particularly in the higher strata, whose complicated circumstances often retard the growth of the purest instincts—no matter how much other conditions may affect the final results.it remains true that, with reference to procreation, love is decidedly superior to money as a factor selection. In fact, in this respect.it is the only fight and proper thing.
Marriage for money directly creates a situation of panmixia—the indiscriminate pairing regardless of individual qualities—a condition that biology has demonstrated to be the cause of the most direct and detrimental degeneration of the human species. In the case of marriage for money, the union of a couple is determined by a factor that has absolutely nothing to do with racial appropriateness—just as the regard for money often e-nough keeps apart a couple who really belong together—and it should be considered as a factor in degeneration to the same extent to which the undoubted differentiation of individuals makes selection by personal attraction more and more important. This case too illustrates once more that the increasing individualization within society renders money increasingly unsuitable as a mediator of purely individual relationships.
The marriage rate is said to be decreasing because______.
选项
A、we demand too much of our partners
B、partners don’t give compliments
C、people are too differentiated socially
D、the economic disparity in many regions is growing
答案
C
解析
文章指出,在高度分化的社会,婚姻很少以来父母同意,更多地取决于个人因素,个人魅力是决定性的。第二段the chance that the children will turn out well depends less upon whether the par-ents agree and complement each other than it does in highly differentiated society…Yet personal at- tracnon should be decisive.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JwBO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
•Lookatthelistbelow.ItshowsgeneralinformationofSanDiegoZoo.•Forquestions6-10,decidewhichsection(A-H)oft
CustomerServiceCentreManagerWantedIt’snouseprovidingexcellentservicesifthepeoplethey’redesignedfordon’tkn
Realpolicemen,bothBritainandtheUnitedStateshardlyrecognizeanyresemblancebetweentheirlivesandwhattheyseeonTV
Lincoln,formerpresidentoftheUnitedStates,isaconspicuousexampleofapoorboywhosucceeded.
IncomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesremainedrelativelystableforaperiodofnearlyfortyyears.Beginninginthe1970’s,h
Potentiallyofferingapowerfulnewtoolagainstterrorism,researchershavefoundanovelwaytodetectdeception:intheliar’
We(areobliged)togrowupinskepticism,requiringproofsforeveryassertionaboutnature,(but)thereisnowayout(except)
Thisweekmarksthe10thanniversaryoftheAlarapplescare,inwhichmanyAmericanconsumersweredrivenintoapanicfollowin
Althoughherresearchtopichadbeenapprovedbyherthesisadvisor,thelibrarypersistedin______thedocuments.
Readerswillfindthatalibrary’scollectionofbooksusually______twocategories:fictionandnon-fiction.
随机试题
下列描述正确的有()。
千分尺可以调整好尺寸,当卡规使用。()
Directions:InthispartthereisanessayinChinese.Readitcarefullyandthenwriteasummaryof200wordsinEnglishontheA
患者,男性,40岁,2天前高热、右胸痛,咯痰,为黄脓性带血丝,量多,X线显示右下肺叶斑片状浸润,无空洞。应予以何种治疗
寒冷环境下,参与维持动物机体体温稳定的是
芍药汤中肉桂属于()
甲未经乙同意,将该船卖给丙,该买卖合同效力如何?为什么?丙未经丁、戊同意,丙与庚的买卖合同效力如何?为什么?
银行结算账户按存款人不同可分为()。
审慎原则并不是不尊重科学,而是对科学应用的务实态度。科研成果的取得及其社会认可,往往代表着巨大的经济利益甚或科学家的终身成就,这就很难保证科学家不会放松科学原则要求而违规:科研成果的社会化往往与企业利益相连,企业逐利时难免会刻意隐瞒危害;由于科研的未知性因
设函数y(x)在区间[1,+∞)上有一阶连续导数,且满足及求y(x).
最新回复
(
0
)