首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Google’s Google problem Google is killing Google Reader. Use of Google Reader, a tool, by the way, for reading online conten
Google’s Google problem Google is killing Google Reader. Use of Google Reader, a tool, by the way, for reading online conten
admin
2013-10-17
32
问题
Google’s Google problem
Google is killing Google Reader. Use of Google Reader, a tool, by the way, for reading online content via RSS was concentrated among a small group of relatively intense users. As it happens, that small group includes quite a lot of people who write for or as part of their living. And so Google Reader has been mourned over, angrily at times, a bit more than the many other Google services that have come and gone.
It isn’t that hard to imagine what Google was thinking when it made this decision. It’s a big company, but even big companies have finite resources, and devoting those precious resources to something that isn’t making money and isn’t judged to have much in the way of development potential is not an attractive option. Dropping Reader isn’t going to hurt the company’s business.
Yet this little contretemps(令人尴尬的事)may suggest bigger trouble ahead for Google and big changes for the internet. One immediate effect is relatively easy to anticipate. John Hempton makes a nice point here: Google is in the process of abandoning its mission. Google’s stated mission is to organize all the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. Google no longer cares. It seems what they care about is mass-markets...
Google has asked us to build our lives around it: to use its e-mail system, its search engines, its maps, its calendars, its cloud-based apps and storage services, its video- and photo-hosting services, and on and on and on. Google wants us to use its services in ways that provide it with interesting and valuable information, and eyeballs. If a particular Google experiment isn’t cutting it in that category, then Google may feel justified in axing it.
But that makes it increasingly difficult for Google to have success with new services. Why commit to using and coming to rely on something new if it might be pulled away at some future date? This is especially problematic for " social" apps that rely on network effects. Even a bad social service may thrive if it obtains a critical mass. Yanking away services beloved by early adopters almost guarantees that critical masses can’t be obtained: not, at any rate, without the provision of an incentive or commitment mechanism to protect the would-be users from the risk of losing a vital service.
There may be bigger implications still, however. As I said, Google has asked us to build our lives around it, and we have responded. This response entails(势必导致)a powerful self-reinforcement mechanism: both providers and users of information and other services change their behaviour as a result of the availability of a Google product. You can see this on a small scale with Reader. People design their websites and content based on the assumption that others, via an RSS reader, will come across and read that content in a certain way. And readers structure their reading habits, and ultimately their mental models of what information is available and where, based on the existence of this tool. If you then pull away the product at the heart of that system, you end up causing significant disruption(混乱), assuming there aren’t good alternatives available.
The issue becomes a bit more obvious when you think about something like search. Many of us now operate under the assumption that if we want to find something we will be able to do so quickly and easily via Google search. If I want an idea for a unique gift for someone, I can put in related search terms and feel pretty confident that I’ll get back store websites and blogs and Pinterest pages and newspaper stories and pictures all providing possible matches.
If I’m a researcher, I know I can quickly find relevant academic papers, data, newspaper accounts, expert analysis, and who knows what else related to an enormous range of topics. Once we all become comfortable with that state of affairs we quickly begin optimising(优化)the physical and digital resources around us. And once we all become comfortable with that, we begin rearranging our mental architecture. We stop memorising key data points and start learning how to ask the right questions. We begin to think differently. We stop keeping a mental model of the physical geography of the world around us, because why bother? We can call up an incredibly detailed and accurate map of the world, complete with satellite and street-level images, whenever we want. The bottom line is that the more we all participate in this world, the more we come to depend on it.
What Google has actually done is create a powerful infrastructure(基础设施). The shape of that infrastructure influences everything that goes online. And it influences the allocation of mental resources of everyone who interacts with the online world. But there isn’t much to the real human world that isn’t shaped by the mental activity of the people in it!
That’s a lot of power to put in the hands of a company that now seems interested, mostly, in identifying core mass-market services it can use to maximise its return on investment. Now in the short run, that may mostly be a problem for all of us. To the extent that we become worried about this phenomenon, we may go out and find back-up services or other alternatives. This will be less convenient and more costly, in terms of time and money, but those sufficiently foresighted(预见的)might feel it’s a better option than opening up gmail one day to read that the email service, and the 10-year’s worth of communication it holds, will soon be gone.
But in the long run that’s a problem for Google. Because we tend not to entrust(委托)this sort of critical public infrastructure to the private sector. Network externalities are all fine and good to ignore so long as they mainly apply to the sharing of news and pictures from a weekend trip with college friends. Once they concern large amount of economic output and the cognitive activity of millions of people, it is difficult to keep the government out. Maybe that obstacle will be sufficient to keep Google providing its most heavily used products. But maybe not.
I find myself thinking again of the brave new world of the industrial city, when new patterns of interaction led to enormous changes in economic activity, in culture and personal behaviour, and in the way we think. We upgraded ourselves, in terms of education and social norms, to maximise the return to urban life. I think we, meaning users of the web and the companies that provide its blood and bones, are only beginning to deal with the implications of a world awash(充斥的)in information.
Google decided to shut down Google Reader because______.
选项
A、it took up too much resources
B、it hurt the company’s business
C、it was not profitable and promising
D、it was unattractive to some people
答案
C
解析
本题考查谷歌关停谷歌读书服务的原因。定位句指出,不难想象谷歌做出如此决定,即使这样的大公司,资源也是有限的,把这有限的资源用在不赢利或是没有发展前景的产品上是不明智的。也就是说谷歌关停谷歌读书服务是因为该服务不赢利而且没有发展前景。C)是对原文的同义转述,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Jyc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Beforefinishinghighschool.B、Afterayearortwoincollege.C、Aftergraduationfromcollege.D、Beforeenteringcollege.B[
A、Bytalkingtoanexpert.B、Byreadinganarticle.C、Byattendinganexerciseclass.D、Bylisteningtotheradio.B
A、60%ofitspopulation.B、70%ofitspopulation.C、30%ofitspopulation.D、40%ofitspopulation.A[听力原文]HowmanypeopleinI
A、Themanandwomanstudythesamecourse.B、Jimlivesnearertotheuniversitythantheman.C、Themanlivesnearertotheuniv
A、Humanandwildlifehealthrisksarebeingreduced.B、Theecologicalsystemwillberestoredinthenearfuture.C、Significant
Wanthappier,better-adjustedkids?Paylessattentiontothem,so【C1】______afamilycoachDavidCode.Hesaysfamiliescentered
SecurityorPrivacy?1.近年来很多公共场合都安装了监控摄像头以保护人们的安全2.摄像头也对人们的隐私造成了一定的影响3.我的观点
Virusesarehuman-madesoftwareprograms【B1】specificallytowreakhavoconpersonalcomputersandnetworks.The【B2】ofcontractin
WhiteHouse,official【S1】______ofthepresidentoftheU.S.,builtinitsoriginalformbetween1792and1800,and【S2】______inW
A、Savemoney.B、Cutdownonwaste.C、Protecttheforests.D、Keeptheenvironmentclean.C
随机试题
医疗机构设立制剂室,应当向所在地省、自治区、直辖市(食品)药品监督管理部门提交的材料有()
凡特别重大的问题或者涉及面特别广的问题,须()。
某建设项目由厂房、办公楼、宿舍等单项工程组成..其中属于单项工程综合概算中的内容是()。【2013年真题】
下列属于安全技术交底的基本要求的是( )。
1999年5月,某研究所工程师王某,从同乡郑某处得知某机械厂研制的“电冰箱电子控温器”未获成功。基于自己的兴趣,王某在该控温器的基础上,利用业余时间,自筹资金,在自己家中的电冰箱上进行分析,开始研制一种新型的电冰箱电子控温器。在此过程中,郑某曾为王某购买元
长江公司2016年度的财务报告于2017年3月20日批准报出,内部审计入员在对2016年度财务报告进行复核时,发现以下交易或事项:(1)长江公司于2016年1月1日购入10套商品房,每套商品房购入价为200万元,并以低于购入价20%的价格出售给10名高级
环孢霉素A是一种能抑制T细胞增殖的药物,它能使人体免疫系统处于无应答或弱应答状态,因此环孢霉素A可用于()。
已知箱中装有4个白球和5个黑球,且规定:取出一个白球得2分,取出一个黑球得1分.现从该箱中任取(无放回,且每球取到的机会均等3个球,记随机变量X为取出3球所得分数之和.求X的数学期望E(X).
很多家长只重视孩子学习成绩的提高,一味重智轻德,父母对孩子百依百顺,把孩子惯成了“小皇帝”“小公主”,导致越来越多的年轻人对父母对长辈不够尊重,对他人冷漠无情,甚至缺乏基本的社会公德,对民族和社会更缺乏一份感情和责任。上述文字所阐述的家庭教育问题在于(
Sevenyearsago,whenIwasvisitingGermany,Imetwithanofficialwhoexplainedtomethatthecountryhadaperfectsolution
最新回复
(
0
)