首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Accidental Scientists A A paradox lies close to the heart of scientific discovery. If you know just what you are looking for, fi
Accidental Scientists A A paradox lies close to the heart of scientific discovery. If you know just what you are looking for, fi
admin
2018-09-11
71
问题
Accidental Scientists
A A paradox lies close to the heart of scientific discovery. If you know just what you are looking for, finding it can hardly count as a discovery, since it was fully anticipated. But if, on the other hand, you have no notion of what you are looking for, you cannot know when you have found it, and discovery, as such, is out of the question. In the philosophy of science, these extremes map onto the purist forms of deductivism and inductivism: In the former, the outcome is supposed to be logically contained in the premises you start with; in the latter, you are recommended to start with no expectations whatsoever and see what turns up.
B As in so many things, the ideal position is widely supposed to reside somewhere in between these two impossible-to-realise extremes. You want to have a good enough idea of what you are looking for to be surprised when you find something else of value, and you want to be ignorant enough of your end point that you can entertain alternative outcomes. Scientific discovery should, therefore, have an accidental aspect, but not too much of one. Serendipity is a word that expresses a position something like that. It’s a fascinating word, and the late .Robert King Merton—"the father of the sociology of science"—liked it well enough to compose its biography, assisted by the French cultural historian Elinor Barber.
C The word did not appear in the published literature until the early 19th century and did not become well enough known to use without explanation until sometime in the first third of the 20th century. Serendipity means a "happy accident" or "pleasant surprise", specifically, the accident of finding something good or useful without looking for it. The first noted use of "serendipity" in the English language was by Horace Walpole. He explained that it came from the fairy tale, called The Three Princes of Serendip(the ancient name for Ceylon, or present day Sri Lanka), whose heroes "were always making discoveries, by accidents and sagacity, of things which they were not in quest of.
D Antiquarians, following Walpole, found use for it, as they were always rummaging about for curiosities, and unexpected but pleasant surprises were not unknown to them. Some people just seemed to have a knack for that sort of thing, and serendipity was used to express that special capacity. The other community that came to dwell on serendipity to say something important about their practice was that of scientists, and here usages cut to the heart of the matter and were often vigorously contested. Many scientists, including the Harvard physiologist Walter Cannon and, later, the British immunologist Peter Medawar, liked to emphasise how much of scientific discovery was unplanned and even accidental. One of the examples is Hans Christian
rsted’s discovery of electromagnetism when he unintentionally brought a current-carrying wire parallel to a magnetic needle. Rhetoric about the sufficiency of rational method was so much hot air. Indeed, as Medawar insisted, "There is no such thing as The Scientific Method," no way at all of systematis-ing the process of discovery. Really important discoveries had a way of showing up when they had a mind to do so and not when you were looking for them. Maybe some scientists, like some book collectors, had a happy knack; maybe serendipity described the situation rather than a personal skill or capacity.
E Some scientists using the word meant to stress those accidents belonging to the situation; some treated serendipity as a personal capacity; many others exploited the ambiguity of the notion. Yet what Cannon and Medawar took as a benign nose-thumbing at Dreams of Method, other scientists found incendiary. To say that science had a significant serendipitous aspect was taken by some as dangerous denigration. If scientific discovery were really accidental, then what was the special basis of expert authority? In this connection, the aphorism of choice came from no less an authority on scientific discovery than Louis Pasteur: "Chance favors the prepared mind." Accidents may happen, and things may turn up unplanned and unforeseen, as one is looking for something else, but the ability to notice such events, to see their potential bearing and meaning, to exploit their occurrence and make constructive use of them—these are the results of systematic mental preparation. What seems like an accident is just another form of expertise. On closer inspection, it is insisted, accident dissolves into sagacity.
F The context in which scientific serendipity was most contested and had its greatest resonance was that connected with the idea of planned science. The serendipitists were not all inhabitants of academic ivory towers. As Merton and Barber note, two of the great early-20th-century American pioneers of industrial research—Willis Whitney and Irving Langmuir, both of General Electric—made much play of serendipity, in the course of arguing against overly rigid research planning. Langmuir thought that misconceptions about the certainty and rationality of the research process did much harm and that a mature acceptance of uncertainty was far more likely to result in productive research policies. For his own part, Langmuir said that satisfactory outcomes "occurred as though we were just drifting with the wind. These things came about by accident." If there is no very determinate relationship between cause and effect in research, he said, "men planning does not get us very far." So, from within the bowels of corporate capitalism came powerful arguments, by way of serendipity, for scientific spontaneity and autonomy. The notion that industry was invariably committed to the regimentation of scientific research just doesn’t wash.
G For Merton himself—who one supposes must have been the senior author—serendipity represented the keystone in the arch of his social scientific work. In 1936, as a very young man, Merton wrote a seminal essay on "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action." It is, he argued, the nature of social action that what one intends is rarely what one gets: Intending to provide resources for buttressing Christian religion, the natural philosophers of the Scientific Revolution laid the groundwork for secularism; people wanting to be alone with nature in Yosemite Valley wind up crowding one another. We just don’t know enough—and we can never know enoughs—to ensure that the past is an adequate guide to the future: Uncertainty about outcomes, even of our best-laid plans, is endemic. All social action, including that undertaken with the best evidence and formulated according to the most rational criteria, is uncertain in its consequences.
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 on the following pages.
Questions 27-32
Reading Passage 3 has seven paragraphs, A-G.
Choose the most suitable heading for paragraphs A-G from the list of headings below.
Write the appropriate number, i-x, in boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet.
List of Headings
i Examples of some scientific discoveries
ii Horace Walpole’s fairy tale
iii Resolving the contradiction
iv What is the Scientific Method
v The contradiction of views on scientific discovery
vi Some misunderstandings of serendipity
vii Opponents of authority
viii Reality doesn’t always match expectation
ix How the word came into being
x Illustration of serendipity in the business sector
Example Answer
Paragraph B iii
Paragraph G
选项
答案
viii
解析
该段落从第三句话“…what one intends is rarely what one gets”开始就可以很明显地看出其与标题viii.Reality doesn’t always match expectation的对应关系。段落中间和后面又讲到诸多“Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action”的例子,同时其他标题的信息也都未被提及。综上所述,正确答案为viii。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KdNO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Britishpoliticalscientistsoncehaddifficultyunderstandinghowtheunbalancingeffectsofaffordinggreaterrepresentationt
TheshahofPersia,althoughhehadtoacknowledgethatthesultanwasaworthyrival,stillconsideredhimselfamighty______,
Ashasalwaysbeenthecasewhentragedyhasstruckourcommunity,thepeopleofourtownfeeltheobligation,andrightlyso,t
Scientistshavelongspeculatedastotheextentthatinbreedingcontributestothedeclineandeventualextinctionofla
Sendingarobotintospacetogatherinformationiscertainlyaviableoption,Linebutshouldberegardedonlyasthat--anopt
WhileforensicscientistscommonlyrelyonfingerprintstohelpidentifyaLineperson,itisnotpossibletousethesamekind
Althoughthescientist’srecommendationsmayhavebeen______,thestudentshadtroublefollowinghis______presentationandw
DuringaEuropeanbroadcastin2002,televisionviewerswere(i)______byabordercollie’sabilitytocorrectlyretrievespecifi
In1755BritishwriterSamuelJohnsonpublishedanacerbiclettertoLordChesterfieldrebukinghispatronforneglectanddecli
随机试题
RS触发器具有两种稳定状态,并具有不定状态。()
材料1:人类每天都在产生垃圾,垃圾总量一天比一天多,由此带来的问题非常棘手。不产生垃圾是不可能的。既然如此,那就退而求其次,倡导大家减少垃圾。然而,减到多少才是少?这里并没有一个标准。而且从总体上看,生产和消费必然产生垃圾,减少垃圾很可能抑制生产
某电建公司通过招投标承揽到一座2×500MW火力发电厂的主体工程安装项目。该安装工程在整个发电厂建设项目中属于其中的一项单位工程,该电建公司将其中的非标制作工程、通风工程等分部工程分包给某机械制造厂和一些专业承包单位。各专业工程陆续开展工程质量检查、验收与
甲公司于2013年3月29日销售给乙公司产品一批,4月2日收到乙公司交来的一张出票日为4月1日、面值为585万元.票面年利率为3%,期限为6个月的商业承兑汇票一张;6月30日计提了3个月的利息。甲公司于7月1日持票到银行贴现(不附追索权).贴现期为3个月,
事业单位的下列会计科目中,年终时应结转记入“事业结余”科目的有()。
_______________,不如须臾之所学也。(荀子《劝学》)
王某在游泳池内被从高处跳水的张某撞昏,溺死于水池底。由于王某生前投保了一份健康保险,保额5万元,而游泳馆也为每位游客保了一份意外伤害保险,保额2万元。事后,张某承担民事损害赔偿责任10万元。问题是:对张某的10万元赔款应如何处理?说明理由。
TherabbithadnonaturalenemiesinAustralia______.
TheUnitedStatesiswell-knownforitsnetworkofmajorhighwaysdesignedtohelpadrivergetfromoneplacetoanotherinthe
A、Hewastired.B、Hisappointmentwaschanged.C、Hehadaflattyre.D、Hisbicyclewasstolen.C
最新回复
(
0
)