首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Get a Paper Published I . Prerequisite doing mass【B1】______【B1】______ collecting mass information and data II. Things y
How to Get a Paper Published I . Prerequisite doing mass【B1】______【B1】______ collecting mass information and data II. Things y
admin
2015-06-14
67
问题
How to Get a Paper Published
I . Prerequisite
doing mass【B1】______【B1】______
collecting mass information and data
II. Things you should do after the submission of your paper
A. If you do not get an acknowledgement
post【B2】______【B2】______
B. When not informed of a review decision for long
write to the editor in a(n)【B3】______way【B3】______
III . Advisable【B4】______to the editor in different situations【B4】______
A. If the paper is rejected with good reasons
accept and learn from the experience
B. If you view the rejection as【B5】______【B5】______
make a protest supported by strong evidence and good reasons
C. When confronted with the editor’s constructive advice
consider【B6】______and attempt to revise【B6】______
D. When sending back the revised manuscript
write a general【B7】______:【B7】______
thank for his effort and comments
promise comments considered
reproduce the editor’s review aligned with the reply:
remind the editor
show him your【B8】______【B8】______
offer a good reason for suggestions not followed
try to【B9】______the reviewer rather than fight with him【B9】______
IV. Other warnings and advice
attach importance to established【B10】______of academia【B10】______
avoid overemphasizing quantity of papers
【B4】
How to Get a Paper Published
Good morning, everyone! As college students, all of you. I believe, have the capacities to do researches by your own, and also have the basic knowledge of writing research papers. But do you know how to make your paper published? Today, I’m going to give you a lecture on this.
(1)First of all, you should write your papers well on the basis of doing mass researches and collecting mass information and data. It’s the prerequisite. Then, please focus your minds on the following tips. After you have followed all the advice on how to write a paper, had it submitted to a journal of your choice, here are things you should do.
(2)First, if the editor and the journal are established and responsible, you should receive an acknowledgement within two weeks. Otherwise, you should post an inquiry. Manuscripts do get lost at times.
Then, once receipt is acknowledged you should wait patiently for a review decision.(3)I personally suggest that if you have not heard from the journal in four months, then you should politely write to the editor to inquire about progress on the review, since occasionally there arc irresponsible editors and reviewers. Once they agreed to process your paper, they owe you some timely response. But be polite and professional in your dealings. Remember reviewing a manuscript is a volunteer activity. As authors, "demanding" actions will get you nowhere.
Finally, the reply comes back from the editor. If the editor accepts the paper without modification or with request for minor revisions only, congratulations!
More likely than not, however, the paper is not accepted as is and the editor wants major revisions and re-review : or worse, the paper is rejected.(4)In either case, you have some decisions to make. Here I offer my own experience on what to do next.
If the paper is rejected outright, then you need to decide if the decision is justified. Most of the time, this is done with good reason including value judgment. The author should accept and learn from the experience.(5)On the rare occasion when you think a real injustice has been committed and you want to protest, you had better do it with very strong evidence and well supported reasons. Furthermore, if you balance your action a-gainst the cost of protest some times you will realize it is not worth the trouble. For almost everyone, you will only have truly significant discovery a couple of times in your entire life. No one said the world is fair and most of the time, it is not worthwhile to get angry with the "small stuff".
(6)Most reviewers are fair and have constructive things to say which you should consider carefully when attempting to revise your paper. Try not to get annoyed by the sometimes sarcastic remarks of the reviewer. Often it is their chance to payback when they were on the receiving end as authors. Thus, don’t be sarcastic and mean in responding to their reviews. Getting angry will only hurt your cause. As the saying goes "don’t get mad, get even by having your paper accepted".
When responding to a reviewer with your revised manuscript and/or specific replies, remember that months probably has gone past since the reviewer read your paper and wrote his review. Make the job easy and pleasant for him.(7)First, write a general covering letter to each reviewer thanking him for his effort and comments. Then promise that you have considered each of his comments and what you have done and responded to each. Then, reproduce his review and give your reply side by side for each remark. Remember, by this time most reviewer probably has forgotten what he said about your paper. You need to make things easy and to remind him.(8)Also showing you took his comments seriously will impress him with your effort and sincerity.
But you need not agree with everything the reviewer said. If you must disagree, do it professionally and with no discomfort. Above all, explain why you cannot do what he suggests with a good reason. Fair referees and editors will respect you.
(9)Above all, remember your task is to win over the reviewer and not to fight with him. The playing field between a reviewer and an author is not level. You can seldom win a fight with an editor or a reviewer.
(10)In addition to dealing with the relationship with an editor or a reviewer, another thing I need to remind you is that though currently quantity of publication is all important, conforming to established custom and traditions of academia is of great significance. The emphasis on quantity will soon pass and you will regret if you give in to some incentives for aberrant and unethical behavior. Therefore, I want to say that you should put correct eyes on the publishing of papers. Never copy anybody’s work!
Well, in summary, when you contact a reviewer, remember to be patient and professional to him, learn from the experience rather than get annoyed if the paper is rejected, and furthermore, do something to remind a reviewer when you send to him your revised manuscript. If you follow my advice, chances are that you will have your paper published. OK, today’s lecture is over. Thank you very much!
选项
答案
responses/countermeasures
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KwOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoBarackObama,AmericawouldsupplyallthefollowingEXCEPT______.
Mergersandtakeoversmeantheactivitiesthattwoormorebusinessesjointogetherandoperateasoneorganization.Mergersus
Inrecentyears,railroadshavebeencombiningwitheachother,mergingintosuper-systems,causingheightenedconcernsaboutm
Accordingtothecomprehensiveinputtheory,"i+1"refersto
TheCongressoftheUnitedStatesiscomposedoftwoparts,namely,______,enjoyingatwo-yearterm,and______,asix-yearter
ReviewingthedecadethatfollowedWorldWarn,Cartwrightspeaksofthe"excitementandoptimism"ofAmericansocialpsycholo
TheUnitedStatesdidn’tparticipateinWorldWarIIuntil
Australiaiscomposedof______statesand______territories.
ImprovingYourMotivationforLearningEnglishI.TheimportanceofthetechniquesforimprovingmotivationA.Necessityforle
AccordingtoJanet,thefactorthatwouldmostaffectnegotiationsis
随机试题
现代陪审团制度起源于()
对大多数企业主管来说,最困扰他们的不是如何与竞争对手抢夺市场,而是如何找到、训练和留住优秀的员工,对高技术企业尤其如此。请你为这些主管在以下几项中找出一种最佳的方法()
我国宪法规定公民享有人身自由权。下列关于我国宪法所规定的人身自由的说法中,正确的是哪些选项?()
某安全管理人员在机加工车间检查,发现甲某操作铣床时穿紧身工作服,袖口扎紧;乙某高速切削铸件时戴防护眼镜;丙某操作车床时戴一般防护手套;丁某清理铁屑时戴防尘口罩,上述操作行为中,存在隐患的人员是()。
下列会计职业道德规范中,要求会计人员在工作中应主动就单位经营管理中存在的问题提出合理化建议,协助领导决策的是()。
A企业2005年的预计销售收入为2000万元,应交增值税额为80万元,该企业适用的消费税率为8%,城市维护建设税税率为7%,教育费附加的征收率为3%。则该企业2005年预计的销售税金及附加为()万元。
数字表诗各字如下:若以此中四个数组成一个成语,成语中第一个字对应的数字是第二个字对应的数字的9倍,第四个字对应的数比第三个字对应的数大1,第二个字对应的数为第四个字对应数字的,则这个成语是______.[img][/img]
某工程由甲公司承包需要60天完成,由甲、乙两公司共同承包需要28天完成,由乙、丙两公司共同承包需要35天完成,则由丙公司承包完成该工程需要的天数为()天.
设x2+y2≤2ay(a>0),则f(x,y)dxdy在极坐标下的累次积分为().
Accordingtothespeaker,whichoneiswrongaboutwildlifetrafficking?
最新回复
(
0
)