首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
admin
2010-01-28
41
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
If one party makes a strong plausible opening in the right way, that opening can often
选项
A、cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
B、lead to an adversarial event.
C、sabotage the whole negotiation process.
D、cause the other party to lose confidence.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/L8Kd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CBecauseusuallystatesareasonthatanswersawhyquestion.Choice(A)usesshirtbutdoesnotanswerw
A、 B、 C、 D、 AThemanismakingapresentation.Choice(B)confusesthesimilarsoundspresentsandpresent
Howlongdoestheprocessofinternationalshippingdocumentstake?
A、 B、 C、 B不可以仅凭提问方式就马上选择正确答案,或是因为答案里有题干中出现过的词就匆忙作出判断。(A)重复出现了问句中的demand,所以很容易将其选为正确答案,但是内容却与题干毫无关联。提到产品质量的(C)也
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
Globalization:Disadvantagestoglobalization(全球化危害)
Evaluatingadvantagesanddisadvantages权衡利弊
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
Makingyourpoint发表自己的观点
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
随机试题
两种对立的发展观是()。
《钢结构工程施工质量验收标准》(GB50205—2020)对钢结构防腐涂料涂层厚度检查数量的要求是()。
万某取得建造师资格证书后,因故未能在3年内申请注册,3年后申请初始注册时必须()。
甲方(某建筑公司)向乙方(某电机厂)订购了一台DQ235型电机。双方约定:由乙方代办托运,交某铁路分局承运,运费由乙方先行垫付,待甲方收到电机支付货款时一并结清。乙方按合同约定将电机交某铁路分局承运,但一直未付运费。后甲方又将一批空调交某铁路分局承运。在
职业生涯管理是组织进行培训与开发的重要内容,评估其效果的标准有()。
根据反垄断法律制度的规定,下列情形中,属于滥用市场支配地位行为的有()。
截至2008年底,全国共有各类民政登记管理单位119.7万个,其中:各级民政行政机关3500个,民政事业单位6.8万个,社会组织41.4万个,基层群众自治组织68.8万个,社会福利企业2.4万个。2008年各类民政登记管理单位固定资产总值为4592
出席学术讨论会的有三个足球爱好者,四个亚洲人,两个日本人,五个商人。以上叙述涉及了所有晚会参加者,其中日本人不经商。那么,参加晚会的人数是:
[A]Lifeisamirrorofwhatyoudo[B]Thinkaboutyourfuturefamily[C]Don’tcountonanyonebutyourself[D]Think
Aseveryschoolboyknows,insectspollinateflowers,whilebirdsandmammalsdisperseseedsbyeatingfruitsortransportingbur
最新回复
(
0
)