首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
admin
2010-01-28
58
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
If one party makes a strong plausible opening in the right way, that opening can often
选项
A、cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
B、lead to an adversarial event.
C、sabotage the whole negotiation process.
D、cause the other party to lose confidence.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/L8Kd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Howlongdoestheprocessofinternationalshippingdocumentstake?
Howlongdoestheprocessofinternationalshippingdocumentstake?
Makingsuggestionsandrecommendations提出建议和劝告
Askingquestions征询
Makingcomparisons进行比较
Makingtravelarrangements旅行安排
Makingcounter-proposals提出反提案
Makingasuggestion提出建议
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
随机试题
________是为了实现一定的目的按某种规则组织起来的数据的集合。
患儿,男,8个月,体重8kg。腹泻3天,大便呈水样,无腥臭味,每日腹泻10余次,伴频繁呕吐。患儿精神欠佳,皮肤弹性差,前囟、眼窝明显凹陷,8小时未排尿,测血钠138mmol/L,医嘱给予静脉补液。该患儿第一天补液总量应为()
A市东区居民朱某(男)与A市西县刘某结婚,婚后双方住A市东区。一年后,公司安排刘某赴A市南县分公司工作。三年之后,因感情不合朱某向A市东区法院起诉离婚。东区法院受理后,发现刘某经常居住地在南县,其对该案无管辖权,遂裁定将案件移送南县法院。南县法院收到案件后
某汽车库,建筑面积3999m2,地下1层,层高3.30m,地下汽车库地面标高至室外地面的距离不大于10m。车库可停车101辆,划分1个防火分区,2个防烟分区。车库设人员疏散口2个,设汽车疏散口2个,汽车出入口均设防火卷帘。该汽车库消防供电负荷为二级,并设有
甲对乙享有5万元债权,已到清偿期限,但乙一直宣称无能力清偿欠款。经调查甲发现,乙对丁享有3个月后到期的7000元债权,戊因赌博欠乙8000元;另外,乙在半年前发生交通事故,因事故中的人身伤害对丙享有1万元债权,因事故中的财产损失对丙享有5000元债权。乙无
组织日常运转中不被消耗掉的固定资产为()。
计算各项货物零担发运运费的公式为:各项货物零担运费=计费重量(公斤)×适用零担运价率(1+适用加成率)。()
某教师提供不同形状的泡泡器,在学生猜想不同泡泡器可能会吹出什么样的形状后,让学生实验操作,解释和交流实验结论,此教师采用的教学方法是()。
()代表作为《洛神赋》。其中,《洛神赋》圆润成熟,笔意中已不见波磔隶意,世称“行世小楷无出其右”。
Jasonwatchedhistwobrothers______outsideinthegarden.
最新回复
(
0
)