首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
admin
2010-01-28
83
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
If one party makes a strong plausible opening in the right way, that opening can often
选项
A、cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
B、lead to an adversarial event.
C、sabotage the whole negotiation process.
D、cause the other party to lose confidence.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/L8Kd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 ABecauseusuallystatesareasonthatanswersawhyquestion.Choice(B)confusesthesimilarsoundsget
Howlongdoestheprocessofinternationalshippingdocumentstake?
Makingoffers提出报价
CouldyoutellmewhatinfluenceyouthinkinternationalbusinessishavingonworkpracticesinChina?Why?
Askingquestions查询
Makingashortspeech
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
CooperationforaNewBusinessYourcompanyisinternationalandveryfamousforchocolates.TheCEOofanotherfamouscompanyw
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
随机试题
给定资料: 1.阆中的乡村学校大都依山而建,地形狭长而起伏。在经过若干年的撤点并校之后,形成了以九年一贯制的中心学校为主体的格局。校园都有相似之处,但又会让来访者耳目一新,其中有许多教育局要求的“标配",比如用学生们的彩色大头照拼成的“笑脸墙",师生共同
病人沐浴时哪项不妥
城镇土地使用税以纳税人实际占用的土地面积为计税依据。()
出入境检验检疫是国家主权的体现主要是指涉及出口、进境、对国外企业注册等实行强制制度。
“进口日期”栏应填()。如果运费为每吨25美元,“运费”栏应填<)。
根据发行主体的不同,债券,债券可以分为()。
为增加幼儿出勤率和经济收入,某幼儿园长期给幼儿喂食“病毒素”药片,一些幼儿出现腹痛、腿疼、肾积水等症状。就民法上的人身赔偿责任而言,幼儿园应承担()。
Intheearly1800s,groupsofEnglishworkerswreckedmachinesthattheyfeltthreatenedtheirjobs.(46)Theywerecalled"Luddi
如果在北京时间7点50分运行以下代码,程序的输出是SubProcedure() IfHour(Time())>=8AndHour(Time())<12Then Debug.Print"上午好!"ElseIf
Asthenewsalesdirectorforanationalcomputerfirm,AlexGordonwas【B1】______hisfirstmeetingwiththecompany’sdistrict
最新回复
(
0
)