首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Income inequality in the United State remained relatively stable for a period of nearly forty years. Beginning in the 1970’s, ho
Income inequality in the United State remained relatively stable for a period of nearly forty years. Beginning in the 1970’s, ho
admin
2014-06-13
80
问题
Income inequality in the United State remained relatively stable for a period of nearly forty years. Beginning in the 1970’s, however, this period of stability ended, as the first signs of widening income inequality became apparent. Over the course of the 1970’s and 1980’s , an increasingly clear trend toward greater income inequality emerged. By the end of the 1980’s, the top 20 percent of workers were receiving the largest share of income ever recorded by government figures, and the bottom three fifths were receiving the lowest shares ever recorded. This trend has continued into the 1990’s and currently shows no signs of decline. When the indicators of growing inequality were first observed in the 1970’s, some researchers argued that the effects were merely temporary artifacts of short-term labor market disturbances. The new occupational structure appears to be one with an increase of well-paid technical, scientific and professional jobs at the top, a sliding middle class, and a growing poorly-paid service and retail jobs at the bottom. Several important labor-force changes appeared to be contributing to the shifting occupational structure.
As occupational reconstructing and growing income inequality have become increasingly evident, a heated debate as to the causes and magnitude of these changes arose. Two dominant bodies of thought emerged around the issue: the job-skill mismatch thesis and the polarization thesis. Mismatch theorists argue that there is an increasing distance between the high skill requirements of post-industrial jobs and the inadequate training and mediocre qualifications of workers. They see the post-industrial economy leaving behind unskilled workers, especially women and minorities. For the mismatch theorist, the trend toward greater inequality is temporary arid will dissipate once the supply of workers acquires the skills demanded by a post-industrial economy. And they predict that the workers will experience an upgrading in their wages over the long run. Polarization theorists, on the other hand, believe that the rise in inequality is permanent, a result of the shift to a service-based economy. This vision of the postindustrial economy is characteristically polarized. The problem according to these theorists, is the type of jobs being generated in the new economy, not worker attributes. Because they believe the causes are structural and permanent, polarization theorists would deny the efficacy of public policies designed to educate and train unskilled workers. They predict a long-term continuation of the trend towards increasing income inequality.
Studies show that the long-run increase in income inequality is also related to changes in the Nation’s labor market and its household composition. The wage distribution has become considerably more unequal with more highly skilled, trained and educated workers at the top experiencing real wage gains and those at the bottom real wage losses. One factor is the shift in employment from those goods-producing industries that have disproportionately provided high-wage opportunities for low-skilled workers, towards services that disproportionately employ college graduates, and towards low-wage sectors such as retail trade. But within industry, shifts in labor demand away from less-educated workers are perhaps a more important explanation of eroding wages than the shift out of manufacturing.
Also cited as putting downward pressure on the wages of less-educated workers are intensifying global competition and immigration, the decline of the proportion of workers belonging to unions, the decline in the real value of the minimum wage, the increasing need for computer skills, and the increasing use of temporary workers.
Which of the following statements is true?
选项
A、The long-run increase in income inequality is caused by he wage distribution.
B、fewer goods-producing industrial workers will be employed.
C、Not enough college students are employed by different services.
D、Less educated workers have become more important.
答案
B
解析
因为劳工雇用已经从goods-producing industries转变到其他领域。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LZO4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Theword"interest"inthefirstparagraphmostprobablymeansAccordingtothetext,theauthorseemstobe
Cats,accordingtotheauthor,______.Theauthorwantstowrite______.
YouareapplyingforapositionasanEnglishteacher.WritealettertotheHeadofForeignLanguagesDepartmentto1)intr
Persons’remarksarementionedatthebeginningofthetextto______.Welearnfromthelastparagraphthat______.
Inthetwodecadesbetween1910and1930,overtenpercenttotheBlackpopulationoftheUnitedStateslefttheSouth,whereth
Plasticisthepanaceaoftheages.Nearlyeveryman-madeobject(1)_____(2)_____of,oratleast(3)_____itsverystructure,
Readingandwritinghavelongbeenthoughtofascomplementaryskills:toreadistorecognizeandinterpretlanguagethathasb
Readingandwritinghavelongbeenthoughtofascomplementaryskills:toreadistorecognizeandinterpretlanguagethathasb
随机试题
溶组织内阿米巴杜氏利什曼原虫
A.血浆胰岛素水平测定B.血糖测定C.糖化血红蛋白A1测定D.糖化血浆白蛋白测定可反映糖尿病患者近8~12周内血糖总水平的检查是
虚证泄泻的特点是( )热证泄泻的特点是( )
女性,35岁,因心慌、乏力伴怕热、多汗2个月就诊。身体评估:体温37.5℃。心率100次/分,血压140/90mmHg,消瘦,甲状腺弥漫性、对称性Ⅱ度肿大,质软。随吞咽上下活动,伴有震颤,并可闻及血管杂音。患者服用甲硫氧嘧啶治疗1个月后,出现高热、咽痛
患者,男性,32岁,6天前感冒后出现左下后牙区胀痛,进食、吞咽时加重。昨日起出现局部自发性跳痛,张口受限,低热,头痛。检查可见:左下颌角区颊部稍肿胀,无压痛,张口度两指,左下第三磨牙近中阻生牙龈红肿充血,挤压可见远中盲袋内少量脓液溢出,颊侧前庭沟丰满、充血
简述班主任对学生的指导包括哪些方面?应如何进行指导?
小明上小学时因经常把麻雀、青蛙、蚯蚓等带到教室而被老师批评和惩罚,上初中后他仍然经常把小动物带进教室,班主任发现后没有批评他,还在班里成立了动物兴趣小组。他非常激动,向班主任表示了决心。半年后,小明在班主任的引导下,通过对动物的探索活动,懂得了学好各门功课
____,кромеменяистарика-крестьянина,который,впрочем,скоронаразъезде,всегоодин.
Mostpeoplewhotravellongdistancecomplainofjetlag.Jetlagmakesbusinesstravelerslessproductiveandmoreprone【21】makin
Naturalflavoringsandfragrancesareoftencostlyandlimitedinsupply.Forexample,thevitalingredientinarosefragrance
最新回复
(
0
)