首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Fight unhealthy food, not fat people It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad— and just how
Fight unhealthy food, not fat people It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad— and just how
admin
2013-10-17
100
问题
Fight unhealthy food, not fat people
It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad— and just how much food companies know about the addictive(添加剂)components of certain foods, and just how much they deliberately target the most vulnerable consumers knowing they are doing damage—is still being discovered. The New York Times offers the latest installment in this weekend’s magazine with an article about the science of junk food addiction.
Nearly everything written about food in the mainstream media relies on the same narrative: Obesity is bad. That kind of reporting is part of what’s keeping us sick.
There’s no denying the fact that the American public has gotten larger in recent decades. Along with getting fatter, we’ve also seen a rise in illnesses like heart disease and certain cancers. Instead of focusing on how our health is hurting, most of the media coverage uses the term " obesity," making the story more about weight than about health—to the point where it’s become an accepted truth that " fat" equals "unhealthy".
That’s not actually the case, though. While "the obesity epidemic" may be a convenient catch-all for the illnesses and health problems related to our food chain, it’s a lazy term and an inaccurate one. Are we actually worried about public health? Or are we offended by fat bodies that don’t meet our thin ideals? In all seriousness: What good does a focus on body size actually do?
If we’re actually concerned about health, then we should focus on health. The addictive qualities of our food, the lack of oversight(监督), the high levels of chemicals and the government subsidies(补贴)to make prices lower making the worst foods the most accessible should concern us and spur us to action.
Nutrient-deficient(营养缺乏)chemically-processed "food" in increasingly larger sizes is bad for all of our bodies, whether we’re fat or thin or somewhere in between. So is the culture in which fast food is able to thrive. Americans work more than ever before; we take fewer vacation days and put in longer hours, especially since the recession hit. The US remains the only industrialized country without national paid parental leave and without compulsory annual vacation time; we also have no federal law requiring paid sick days. 85% percent of American men and 66% of women work more than 40 hours per week. In Norway, for comparison, 23% of men work more than 40-hour weeks, and only 7% of women.
Despite all this work, American income levels remain remarkably divided into the poorest and the richest, with the richest few controlling nearly all of the wealth. In one of the wealthiest countries on earth, one in seven people rely on federal food aid, with most of the financial benefits going to big food companies who are also able to produce cheap, nutritionally questionable food thanks to agricultural subsidies. The prices of the worst foods are artificially depressed, the big food lobbies have enormous power, and the biggest loser is the American public, especially low-income folks who spend larger proportions of their income on food but face systematic impediments(妨碍)to healthy eating and exercise.
With demanding work days, little time off and disproportionate amounts of our incomes going toward things like health insurance and childcare that other countries provide at a lower cost, is it any surprise that we eat fast-food breakfast on our laps in the car and prefer dinner options that are quick and cheap?
Reforming our food system requires major structural changes, not just saying no to put down that bag of chips. We need to push back against corporate interests. Food companies are incredibly good at positing themselves as crusaders(拥护者)for personal choice and entities simply dedicated to giving the public what it wants. Somehow, big food companies have convinced us that drinking a 32oz soda is a matter of personal liberty, and that the government has no place in regulating how much liquid sugar can be sold in a single container.
In fact, we know—and they certainly know—that human beings are remarkably bad at judging how much we’re eating. Food companies use that information to encourage over-consumption, and to target certain consumers who tend to have less disposable income to invest in healthy food—poor people, people of color, kids.
Food is a social justice issue that has disproportionately negative impacts on groups already facing hardship. That should be an issue for every socially conscious person. But when looking at the large number of problems caused not only by our big food industry but by the policies that enable them and our cultural norms that incentivize poor health choices, too many people simply turn " obesity" into the boogeyman(具有超人力量的恶巫).
Doctors even blame fatness for all sorts of medical conditions and people don’t get proper treatment. Fat women go to the doctor less often for routine cancer screenings, and patients report doctors focusing on their weight and ignoring real medical problems like broken bones and asthma(哮喘).
On the policy side, promoters of laws that incentivize health or push back on corporate food interests such as Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move! initiative, bans on extra-large sodas, and extra SNAP benefits at farmer’s markets inevitably target " obesity" in their campaigns. That strategy has the effect of maligning(诽谤)the beauty of certain bodies instead of encouraging everyone to be healthier and countering the enormous influence of big companies. As a result, many people who should be the natural allies of health-promoting initiatives are put off by the shaming fat language.
"Obesity epidemic" language has also fed into the idea of body size and eating habits as social group. Thinner kale(甘蓝)—eating elite liberals in the Northeast are trying to force-feed cabbage to heavier real Americans in the South and Midwest. No one wins with that kind of cultural polarization.
Yes, let’s push back against big food companies and question their outsized influence in Washington and in our daily lives, and let’s focus on making healthy food more widely accessible. Let’s realize that the challenges extend beyond just what we eat. Let’s fight for the humane(仁爱的)work policies that will make us all healthier.
But let’s do that because public health is all of our concern, not because it’s culturally easy to point the finger at fat people. Giving every member of a society the chance to be as healthy as possible is a moral good. It saves money and it saves lives. So let’s do it the right way and the most effective way without lazily relying on the word " obesity. "
To change our food system we need to fight against ______.
选项
A、fast-food restaurants
B、big food companies
C、corporate interests
D、the government’s regulation
答案
C
解析
本题考查要想改变我们的食品系统,我们得与什么做斗争。定位句指出,改变我们的食品系统需要进行主要的结构性变革,我们需要与公司利润做斗争。C)直接给出了答案,故为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Lgc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thestarsareusuallyactorsandactresses.Mostpeopledonotevenlookatthenameofthedirectororproducer,exceptone-Ste
Thestarsareusuallyactorsandactresses.Mostpeopledonotevenlookatthenameofthedirectororproducer,exceptone-Ste
A、Heisonbehalfofsomebody.B、Hedoesn’twanttomeettheman.C、Heisbusywithsomethingnow.D、Hewillbebusyforawhole
Nowadays,itwasfashionabletospeakofagenerationgap,a【S1】______betweenyoungpeopleandtheirelders.Parentscomplained
Thissupermarketputscommoditiesofbadqualityonshelves,which______(损害了消费者利益).
Thescientisthas______(把他的一生献给了国家的发展),anddeserveseveryone’srespect.
______(鉴于大多数经济学家认为)thatraisingtheminimumwageisbadforoureconomy,doyouthinkitiswisetokeepincreasingtheminimu
SharingEconomicLossesThroughInsuranceEachminuteofthedayornight,everyonefacesapossiblefinancialloss.Ahome
Whydoestheauthorcongratulatehismalereadersatthebeginningofthepassage?WhatdoesCartmillsayaboutregularcheck-u
A、Thefirstlecture.B、Aclassmeeting.C、Theopeningceremony.D、Anorientation.D男士询问经济学课程的相关信息,女士表示前一天介绍会发放的资料中都可以查到这些信息。而男士说
随机试题
镍铬一镍硅热电偶的正级为红色,负级为棕色。
按照建筑物安全的基本要求,没有严重污染是指()。
企业为了应付突发事件,有必要维持比日常正常运转所需金额更多的现金,这是出于投机性需求。()
公安领导工作,主要有政治领导工作、行政领导工作和业务领导工作。
某厂进行材料加工,制造甲、乙两种环保包装箱,已知同样用3平方米材料制成的甲箱个数比制成的乙箱个数少2个,且制成一个甲箱比制成一个乙箱需要多用20%的材料。如果制作甲、乙两种包装箱共60000个,且甲箱数量不少于乙箱数量的2倍,则最少需要材料:
借口就是承认活动本身是错的,但是当事人否认他应当承担责任。辩解则是承认应当对活动承担责任,但是当事人否认这项活动是错的。面对失败的事件时,人们使用借口以尽可能地减轻自己应当承担的责任;而人们使用辩解的目的是试图重新界定有争议的行动,使之看起来不至于太差。
下列合同中不属于无偿合同的是()。
魏某受恐怖活动组织的指派潜入我国进行恐怖活动,先后杀害3人,绑架1人。魏某的行为不构成何种犯罪()。
Wehaveheardalotaboutthehealthbenefitsoftea,especiallygreentea.Itishighinpolyphenols,compoundswithstrongan
ThereareseveralhypothesesabouttheoriginsofthefirstNeolithicsettlersinIreland,butmostofthesecontainproblems.F
最新回复
(
0
)