首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
______ changed the speaker’s family fortunes drastically in his childhood.
______ changed the speaker’s family fortunes drastically in his childhood.
admin
2009-06-24
48
问题
______ changed the speaker’s family fortunes drastically in his childhood.
My enthusiasm for science stems from horrid experiences during the First World War. I was nearly six when it broke out, and it completely changed our family fortunes: from being well-off to penury; to hunger, squalor and disease. Seeking escape from the grim reality, I read avidly, mainly science fiction. Jules Verne fired my imagination. I dreamed that science would become the means to alleviate the miseries of life and to eradicate the scourge of war. Thus, my life-long outlook on science was formed: it should push forward the frontiers of knowledge but also serve human welfare. The odds against my becoming a scientist were immense. I had to work for a living and was thus unable to attend school, the normal path to university. Nevertheless, I taught myself, reading science textbooks, mainly in physics.
I was 20 when I heard about the Free University of Poland in Warsaw, where a school certificate was not an entrance requirement, and classes were in the evenings. I enrolled for the physics course, and upon its completion in 1932, was offered a post as an assistant in the Physics Department. The salary was barely enough to get by, but I was in seventh heaven: at long last, I had the opportunity to do scientific research.
The year 1932 was the mirabilis in physics, the start of spectacular advances in the new subject of nuclear physics. My laboratory was very poorly equipped: we had only 30 rug of radium as the source of radiation. But by making up for scarcity with skill, we were able to compete with Fermi’s team in Rome, which had a gram of radium. Among our main achievements was the discovery of the inelastic scattering of neutrons.
In February 1939, I was working on the scattering of neutrons by uranium, when I read the paper by Meitner and Frisch on the discovery of fission. It occurred to me (as it did to others) that several neutrons should be emitted at fission, and it did not take me long to confirm it experimentally. This opened fateful possibilities: a chain reaction leading to the release of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, but also to the atom bomb.
Work on a weapon of mass destruction went totally against my scientific ideals. I knew, however, that these ideals would be eradicated if, by the acquisition of the bomb, Hitler won the war. Throughout the summer of 1939, I agonized over this dilemma. My scruples were finally overcome by the outbreak of the Second World War. By that time I was in Liverpool on a year’s research fellowship, working with James Chadwick In November 1939, I put to him that we should start research on the feasibility of the atom bomb. My rationale was that the only way to prevent Hitler from using the bomb and winning the war, was for us too to have it and to threaten retaliation. It was never my intention that the bomb be used; we needed it to prevent its use.
After the research work in Britain established the scientific feasibility of the bomb, several of us were invited to join the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos. When, near the end of 1944, I learned that the German atom bomb project had been abandoned, I immediately resigned and returned to Liverpool.
I learned about the "success" of the Manhattan Project when the BBC announced the destruction of Hiroshima. The use of the bomb on a civilian population shocked me deeply, and had a decisive influence on the rest of my life.
My childhood dream about science has become reality to a large extent. On the whole, we are now much better off, and most of the betterment is due to advances in science and technology. But these very advances have also increased the dangerous outcomes of a war. A war-free world may seem utopian, but the alternative is unacceptable.
选项
答案
was poorly equipped/had little radium
解析
独白第三段第二、三句提到了他的实验室条件与另一位科学家的差距:My laboratory was very poorly equipped...had a gram of radium,即他的实验室装备很差,镭也没有别人多,因此本题用was poorly equipped或者had little radium回答都可。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LuTd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
SurveyFoundManyWomenMisinformedAboutCancerSixty-threepercentofAmericanwomenthinkthatifthere’snofamilyhist
SurveyFoundManyWomenMisinformedAboutCancerSixty-threepercentofAmericanwomenthinkthatifthere’snofamilyhist
SurveyFoundManyWomenMisinformedAboutCancerSixty-threepercentofAmericanwomenthinkthatifthere’snofamilyhist
Johnhasalwaysremainedloyaltohisfamilyandfriends.
TheySayIreland’stheBestIrelandisthebestplaceintheworldtoliveinfor2005,accordingtoalifequalityranking
TheySayIreland’stheBestIrelandisthebestplaceintheworldtoliveinfor2005,accordingtoalifequalityranking
HowcanBritainreacttothethreatscomingfromRussiaaswellasfromthedevelopingcountries?Thereisalimit,ofcourse,t
Hedecidedtoovercomehisshortcomings.
Sheperseveredinherideasdespiteobviousobjectionsraisedbyfriends.
Whatwasthemaincauseoftheseverecasualties?
随机试题
Carservicingissomethingthateverycarownerhastoexperienceinayear.Thebestmethodforservicingyourcaristogoto
男,患高血压20余年,在查体时最不可能出现的是
根据《药品经营质量管理规范》,有关药品批发氽业出库复核和出库记录的说法,错误的是
防水混凝土试配时的抗渗等级应比设计要求提高()MPa。
终身教育是人生各阶段当中所受各种教育的总和,也是人所受的不同类型教育的总和。()
下列句子中,划线成语使用恰当的一句是()。
根据以下资料回答问题。F省2007年全年实现地区生产总值9160.14亿元,其中,第一产业增加值1038.38亿元,增长4.0%;第二产业增加值4508.02亿元,增长18.6%;第三产业增加值3613.74亿元,增长13.8%。人均地区生产总值25
根据《公务员法》的相关规定,下列()不属于公务员在机关外兼职应符合的条件。
你可以随时愚弄某些人。假若以上属实,以下哪些判断必然为真?I.张三和李四随时都可能被你愚弄。Ⅱ.你随时都想愚弄人。Ⅲ.你随时都可能愚弄人。Ⅳ.你只能在某些时候愚弄人。V.你每时每刻都在愚弄人。
Malnutritionduringweaningage—whenbreastmilkisbeingreplacedbysemi-solidfoods—ishighlyprevalentinchildrenofpoorh
最新回复
(
0
)