首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2011-02-11
56
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values.”
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force. Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity—Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun—share one quality that the PM should envy more than any other at present., they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’ s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
The writer seems to side with ______.
选项
A、the far right
B、the liberal Powellites
C、the liberal Dutch establishment
D、the Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis
答案
D
解析
见第十一段和倒数第二段。从中应该可以看出选项D是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LueO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Dopeoplewhochoosetogoonexotic,far-flungholidaysdeservefreehealthadvicebeforetheytravel?Andeveniftheypay,wh
WHYSHOULDanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthemo
A、Yes,asfewerthanbefore.B、Yes,butfewerthanbefore.C、Yes,theyarenotneededanymore.D、No,theirservicesarediscont
Literatureisameansbywhichweknowourselves.Byitwemeet【M1】_______.futureselves,andrecognizepastselves;
HowtoConductEmploymentInterviewsGenerallyspeaking,thepurposeofemploymentinterviewsarethree-fold:a.tomatcha
TheGermanictribescametoEnglandfromthecontinentaboutthemiddleofthe5thcenturyweretheAngles,Saxonsand______.
行路难,但生之路谁都要走。有的人在赶路。心急切切,步匆匆,眼中只有目标却忽略了风景。可路迢迢不知哪能儿是终点。有的人如游客,不急不慌,走走停停,看花开花落,看云卷云舒,有时了民在风中走,雨中行,心却像张开的网,放过焦躁苦恼。人生之路谁不走?只是
PaulaJones’caseagainstBillClintonisnow,forallpossiblepoliticalconsequencesandcapacityformediasensation,afairy
WestminsterPalaceistheseatof______
随机试题
某农产品销售公司组织10辆运输车装运鳕鱼、草鱼、鲫鱼共60吨去外地销售,每辆车只能装运同一种鱼,且必须装满。装运每种鱼的车辆都不少于2辆,每辆车的载鱼量分别为鳕鱼8吨、草鱼6吨、鲫鱼5吨,每吨获利分别为0.1万元、0.2万元、0.3万元,最大的利润是:
利用归结原则计算下列极限
机关临时机构形成的文件,应由机关办公室整理归档。
下列各项,属终末消毒的是
既能解毒消痈,又能凉血止血的药物是
某公司2002年年初负债对所有者权益的比率为1。若该公司计划年末所有者权益为5000万元,并使债权人投入的资金受到所有者权益保障的程度提高5个百分点,则该公司2002年年末资产负债率为()。(计算结果保留2位小数)
某省煤炭资源税税率为8%,某煤矿2017年2月销售自采原煤取得收入500万元(不含增值税,下同);用自采未税原煤连续加工成洗选煤1000吨,销售600吨,每吨售价0.1万元,将洗选煤100吨无偿换取某保洁公司的保洁服务。已知计算资源税时洗选煤折算率为90%
相传尧时禹平洪水,分天下为九州,包括下列的()。
项目区分度常用的方法有:()。
Ininterviews,famouspeopleoftensaythatthekeytobecomingbothhappyandsuccessfulisto"dowhatyoulove."Butmasterin
最新回复
(
0
)