2. 考研
  3. Few would dispute that the Lansley reforms of the National Health Service in England, embodied in the Health and Social Care Act

Few would dispute that the Lansley reforms of the National Health Service in England, embodied in the Health and Social Care Act

admin2022-11-01  60
问题     Few would dispute that the Lansley reforms of the National Health Service in England, embodied in the Health and Social Care Act 2012, failed. More than 500 pages long, and often opaquely expressed, the legislation stripped control of the NHS from national and local government, and thus from the public, creating a large new bureaucracy to manage healthcare, drive competition and build a regulated internal market. Coming amid fierce spending austerity, the reforms were often seen as the enabler of a program of cuts and privatization. "I could and should have stepped in earlier," David Cameron admitted in his autobiography.
    Disastrous though the reforms have been, and clear though the case is for replacing them, a new attempt at reorganization would be destabilizing without strong support within the NHS that it can be implemented sympathetically. Matt Hancock embarked on such an attempt on Thursday, in his Integration and Innovation white paper. His proposals are unquestionably aligned with the goal that NHS England has been advocating to improve integrated care in the past two years. But Mr. Hancock will have to make a strong case over the coming weeks if the public is to be persuaded that this reorganization is the right priority in health policy.
    That’s because the context is at least as tough today as it was in 2010-11. The NHS is in the middle of the biggest public health crisis it has ever faced. Staff are exhausted
    and there are large numbers of vacancies. Waiting lists for essential interventions are alarmingly lengthening—nearly quarter of a million people are now waiting more than 12 months for treatment. The care crisis is getting worse and there is no clear plan for reform and financing. The economy is on life support, with public money likely to be very tight for years.
    Exactly why this is the right or necessary time to launch a structural reorganization of the NHS is not obvious. Higher spending seems a much more immediate and practical response. Mr. Hancock says that lessons from the pandemic point towards the need for new approach. That may well be true. Covid has cruelly exposed some of the multiple fragmentations in the health service—not just between health and care, but between proactive and reactive health services, between hospitals and general practitioners, and between physical and mental health.
    It is true that the Covid-19 crisis shows the need for better integration. This is something for which NHS England has been pressing, in the form of what it calls integrated care systems. But the largest single example of the current fragmentation—the relative neglect of care homes in relation to hospitals—will remain unaddressed until there is a proper spending programme, which forms no part of the white paper.
According to the author, Hancock’s white paper__________.
选项 A、will effectively handle the public health crisis
B、is inadequate to finance the care homes
C、will be an example of integrated care systems
D、will be carried out without obstacles
答案 B
解析 根据题干关键词white paper定位到最后一段最后一句，该句提到：但是目前分离的最大问题就是与医院相比重视程度不够的护理中心，如果没有合适的投资规划，将不会得到改善，而白皮书中却并没有提及投资(But the largest single example of the current fragmentation—the relative neglect of care homes in relation to hospitals—will remain unaddressed until there is a proper spending programme，which forms no part of the white paper．)。由此可知，汉考克的白皮书在资金支持方面内容是缺失的，故答案为选项[B]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/M0MD777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)