首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
admin
2022-10-09
25
问题
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of use" agreements would surely win. These legal thickets are designed to protect companies from litigious online shoppers and users of web services. Some firms require agreement, as when users are asked to click a box before creating an Apple ID. Other sites explain their policies without seeking customers’ explicit consent. Few consumers read these terms, let alone understand them. Because they involve no negotiation between customer and company, firms often insert language conferring broad protections to lower their risk of liability. But in a new twist, legal disclaimers designed to limit lawsuits are now unleashing litigation.
(2) A surge of lawsuits in America claims that companies’ online agreements violate consumers’ rights. Consumers are banding together in class actions against targets including Apple, Avis, Bed Bath& Beyond, Toys R Us and Facebook. The cases have a tinge of the bizarre, citing a law passed before companies even had websites. And the lawsuits accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits, a convoluted argument even by the standards of American jurisprudence. Nevertheless, the litigation could have broad implications for the firms involved and for future class actions.
(3) The suits seek to exploit the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago. This was intended to prevent companies that do business in the state from using contracts, notices or signs to limit consumer rights protected by law.
(4) Trial lawyers only recently began to use the TCCWNA to target online agreements. "All firms that seek to represent consumers are constantly mining different data fields for potential ways consumer rights are being violated, " explains Gary Lynch, of Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela & Carpenter, a law firm. James Bogan of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, which has defended companies in class actions, describes the use of the TCCWNA as "very creative". But class-action lawyers such as Mr. Lynch may have struck gold.
(5) The lawsuits vary, but generally include allegations that online terms violate consumers’ rights to seek damages as protected by New Jersey law and fail to explain which provisions cover New Jersey. Unusually in American law, plaintiffs need not show injury or loss in order to sue but merely prove violation of the TCCWNA. Moreover, the lawsuits are aimed not only at firms headquartered in New Jersey but all manner of companies that merely do business in the state. Gavin Rooney of Lowenstein Sandler, another law firm, counts about 40 TCCWNA cases in the recent surge. What is more, the TCCWNA entitles each successful plaintiff to at least $100 in damages, plus fees to lawyers and so on. If a website has millions of visitors, the costs to a company could be staggering.
(6) Whether the lawsuits will succeed is unclear. Whatever the outcome of individual claims, the barrage of litigation will probably prompt firms to adjust their online terms. "Don’t overreach." Mr. Rooney advises clients. For example, a company might no longer add words to terms-of-use agreements that seek to limit liability from gross negligence or fraud.
(7) That would be good news for consumers. But changes to terms of use do not always serve their interests. A growing number of firms, emboldened by favourable Supreme Court rulings, have adopted clauses that limit class-action suits. Consumers are instead restricted to resolving disputes individually, in arbitration. The TCCWNA cases may inspire more firms to add such caveats. That might limit frivolous suits. But consumers with grave complaints would be unable to sue, either. In the end lawsuits over restrictive contracts may make them more restrictive still. (本文选自 The Economist)
The lawsuits in New Jersey are aimed at________.
选项
A、all companies that do business in it
B、firms that caused injury or loss to consumers
C、firms only headquartered in it
D、plaintiffs that can show injury or loss
答案
A
解析
细节题。文章第五段第三句提到,诉讼所针对的不仅是总部设在新泽西州的公司,而且还有在该州从事经营活动的公司的一切行为。由此可知,A“在新泽西州从事商业活动的所有公司”为答案。B“使消费者受损害或损失的公司”、C“只是总部设在新泽西州的公司”和D“能出具受损证据的起诉人”都不符合原文意思,因此排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MJkK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Theyshouldbeatleast12peopleinateam.B、Theteammembershouldbemorethan18.C、Everyoneneedstogethisparents’pe
[A]benefits[B]moving[C]restrict[D]waste[E]similar[F]save[G]separately[H]different[I]multiple[J]nonsalaried[K]number[L]
Whichofthefollowingsentenceshasanappositive?
A.actionB.butC.distractedD.absurdE.analogiesF.pullG.copyH.authorsI.concentratedJ.appearedK.livelyL
A、Byherstudentcreditcard.B、Byusingherdad’screditcard.C、Byherownallowance.D、Byborrowingmoneyfromparents.A①选项都
A、Becausehewantstosmoke.B、Becauseit’sagiftforhisson.C、Becausehecollectslighters.D、Becauseheforgetstotakeit
YoungPeopleShouldPursueLong-term,RealisticGoalsThemodernsocietyprovidespeoplewithmoreopportunitiesthanbefore
EarnYourParent’sTrust1.【T1】ofprivilegesthatyouwant【T1】______Thereasonwhyparentsdon’tgiveyouprivilegesKidsmayu
WhatCausesJetLagandHowtoAvoidIt1.Facts■alongflightaffects【T1】________【T1】_________■thenatur
PassageOneWhatdofashionmagazinesandTVadslinkfashionto?
随机试题
下列有关《哈姆雷特》的解说,不正确的一项是()。
当发现钢筋脆断、焊接性能不良或力学性能显著不正常等现象时,应对该批钢筋进行()或其他专项检验。
国务院和省、自治区、直辖市人民政府的环境保护行政主管部门,应当()发布环境状况公报。
下列交通安全设施中,属于交通标志的有()。
根据《建筑安装工程费用项目组成》文件的规定,下列属于直接工程费中的材料费的是()。
A公司2×18年有关金融资产业务如下:(1)A公司1月1日购入甲公司5%的股权,指定为以公允价值计量且其变动计入其他综合收益的金融资产;3月6日甲公司宣告现金股利100万元。(2)A公司2月1日购入乙公司发行5年期债券,划分为以公允价值计量且其变动计入
1998×998+999×444=()。
奥地利法学家埃利希在《法社会学原理》中指出:“在当代以及任何其他的时代,法的发展的重心既不在立法,也不在法学或司法判决,而在于社会本身。”关于这句话涵义的阐释,下列说法错误的是:
一切艺术都是抒情的,都必表现一种心灵上的感触,显著的如喜怒爱恶哀愁等情绪,微妙的如兴奋颓唐忧郁宁静以及种种不易名状的飘来忽去的心境。文学当作一种艺术看,也是如此。不表现任何情致的文字就不算是文学作品。文字有言情说理叙事状物四大功用,在文学的文字
Hefoundhisfatherhardtounderstandbecausehisfatherwastooshortandthin.Hisfatherwasstrictwitheverythinghedid.
最新回复
(
0
)