首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
admin
2011-01-05
53
问题
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making a whole range of decisions about our health which go beyond this limited area; for example, whether or not to smoke, exercise, drive a motorbike, or drink alcohol really. The ways we reach decisions and form attitudes about our health are only just beginning to be understood.
The main paradox is why people consistently do things which are known to be very hazardous. Two good examples of this are smoking and not wearing seat belts. Both these examples underline elements of how people reach decisions about their health. Understanding this process is crucial. We can then more effectively change public attitudes to hazardous, voluntary activities like smoking.
Smokers run double the risk of contracting heart disease, several times the risk of suffering from chronic bronchitis and at least 25 times the risk of lung cancer, as compared to non-smokers. Despite extensive press campaigns ( especially in the past 20 years) , which have regularly told smokers and car drivers the grave risks they are running, the number of smokers and seat belt wearers has remained much the same. Although the number of deaths from road accidents and smoking are well publicised, they have aroused little public interest.
If we give smokers the real figures, will it alter their views on the dangers of smoking? Unfortunately not. Many of the "real figures" are in the form of probabilistic estimates, and evidence shows that people are very bad at processing and understanding this kind of information.
The kind of information that tends to be relied on both by the smoker and seat belt non-wearer is anecdotal, based on personal experiences. All smokers seem to have an Uncle Bill or an Auntie Mabel who has been smoking cigarettes since they were twelve, lived to 90, and died because they fell down the stairs. And if they don’t have such an aunt or uncle, they are certain to have heard of someone who has. Similarly, many motorists seem to have heard of people who would have been killed if they had been wearing seat belts.
Reliance on this kind of evidence and not being able to cope with "probabilistic" data form the two main foundation stones of people’s assessment of risk. A third is reliance on press-publicised dangers and causes of death. American psychologists have shown that people overestimate the frequency (and therefore the danger) of the dramatic causes of death (like aeroplane crashes)and underestimate the undramatic, unpublicised killers (like smoking) which actually take a greater toll of life.
What is needed is some way of changing people’s evaluations of and attitudes to the risks of certain activities like smoking. What can be done? The "national" approach of giving people the "facts and figures" seems ineffective. But the evidence shows that when people are frightened, they are more likely to change their estimates of the dangers involved in smoking or not wearing seat belts. Press and television can do this very cost-effectively. Programmes like Dying for a Fag (a Thames TV programme) vividly showed the health hazards of smoking and may have increased the chances of people stopping smoking permanently.
So a mass-media approach may work. But it needs to be carefully controlled. Overall, the new awareness of the problem of health decisions and behaviour is at least a more hopeful sign for the future.
For answers 51-55, mark
Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;
N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;
NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.
For answers 56-60, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage in a maximum of 4 words.
选项
答案
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MK8K777K
本试题收录于:
A类竞赛(研究生)题库大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)分类
0
A类竞赛(研究生)
大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)
相关试题推荐
Severalguestswerewaitinginthe______forthefrontdoortoopen.
NEWYORKMay26,(Reuters)—AttorneyDennisKeniganjustspentaweekrisingatdaybreaktoanswere-mailsandfieldconferencec
—WouldyoumindansweringafewquestionsforasurveyI’mdoing?—______—Howdoyoufeelaboutthefundingforuniversityeduc
Thegovernmentismakingeveryeffortto______aneconomiccrisis,butitseemsnothingcouldhelp.
YouareinEnglandhelpingtoorganiseacourseforforeignstudentswhichbeginsnextweek.Thismorningyoureceivedamessage
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Thepolicemanlookedme______severaltimesandobviouslydislikedwhathesaw.
Allhertime_________experiments,shehasnotimeforsports.
随机试题
在Excel工作表中,假设A2=7,B2=5.6,选择A2:B2区域,并将鼠标指针放在该区域右下角填充句柄上,拖动至E2,则E2=()
关于急性失血引起的变化,下列哪一项是不正确的
用于挺出龈缘处折断牙根的器械是
A.肺与肾B.肺与脾C.肺与肝D.肺与心E.脾与肾具有先后关系的两脏是
人体测量的主要统计函数有()。
某化妆品公司(一般纳税人)2012年10月将自产的低档洗发水(不含税价7万元)全部和自产的高档化妆品搭配成成套化妆品5000套。当月对外销售成套化妆品3000套,不含税价14万元;销售中低档自产护发素,取得不舍税价款9万元。该企业上述业务应纳消费税为(
(2012—单选—3)公元383年,淝水之战交战的双方是()。
下列不属于直丝弓矫治器滑动法关闭间隙的施力装置是()。
中国共产党抗日战争时期争取中间势力需要的条件有
A、At8:35.B、At8:45.C、At8:00.D、At8:25.C该题为数字时间题,根据女士的回答“every30minutes”,“7:30train,nexttrain”等关键词可知下一班火车是八点整。
最新回复
(
0
)