首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Feeding the Masses a Load of Manure The Green Revolution Myth, Norman Borlaug, and World Hunger [A] Most people do
Feeding the Masses a Load of Manure The Green Revolution Myth, Norman Borlaug, and World Hunger [A] Most people do
admin
2018-05-11
113
问题
Feeding the Masses a Load of Manure
The Green Revolution Myth, Norman Borlaug, and World Hunger
[A] Most people don’t know Norman Borlaug. He’s the guy who is widely recognized as the father of the "Green Revolution"—the system of farming that combined hybrid seeds with chemical pesticides and fertilizers to grant the world significantly increased crop yields, especially yields of "cereal crops" like wheat, corn, and soybeans.
[B] Mr. Borlaug has been heard recently reproaching "extreme greenies" for promoting organic, sustainable agriculture, saying that such a move either would require the conversion of millions more acres of meadow and forest land into farm land or would mean mass starvation due to what he claims are lower yields from organic farms. With all due respect, we think Stormin’ Norman B. is out in left field playing scarecrow, spouting off about nothing more than the Green Revolution Myth.
Food, World Hunger, and Population Growth
[C] First, there is an obvious question about the logic of Borlaug’s assertion that the increased yield from Green Revolution farming arrived just in time to save hundreds of millions, maybe billions, of earth’s swelling human masses from starvation in the 20th century. One could just as easily frame the issue the other way around: Might it have been the suddenly increased availability of cheap food that itself allowed the global population to rise so quickly? Remember the old saying about "tasks expand to fill the amount of time allowed them"? A version of that may apply here.
[D] Another way to look at the question is whether the Green Revolution has been successful at eliminating hunger. It hasn’t. Since the Green Revolution kicked into high gear in the 1960s, there has been only a modest reduction in the number of people starving or chronically hungry. In 1970, there were an estimated 942 hundred million people in that category; in 2002, the United Nations reported that the number was 842 million. This modest reduction has been almost entirely due to lower levels of hunger among the Chinese population, with the number of hungry people increasing in most other areas of the world.
[E] It is true, of course, that a few billion more people are being fed today compared to half a century ago. But it’s far too simplistic to give the Green Revolution the credit. Two of the main factors that do deserve credit are improvements in seeds via hybridization and major increases in the use of irrigation, including the unsustainable over-pumping of groundwater. These factors plus the chemicals of the Green Revolution combined to put plant growth into overdrive.
The Downside of the Green Revolution
[F] So, if the Green Revolution did help increase total food output, what’s not to like? Plenty. The technologies of the Green Revolution should be looked at as the plant equivalent of steroid use in human athletes. A jock that uses steroids will gain muscle and strength faster and have a competitive advantage. But the big boost is not sustainable over a long period of time, and the negative side effects are well known and often catastrophic to the athlete.
[G] In the case of Green Revolution farming, the chemicals used pollute our land, air, and water, the switch from heavily rotated multiple crops to mono-cropping or dual-cropping reduces total soil fertility and the nutritional value of our food; and the lower number of seed varieties used reduces the genetic diversity found in crops, thus endangering the stability of farm output in the future. The side effects related to soil fertility and genetic diversity will ultimately take their toll. Indeed, yield increases in today’s farm fields have generally leveled off and, in cases such as rice and wheat, yields are beginning to decline in some areas.
[H] Let’s be a little more specific about the problems associated with Green Revolution farming: (1) Farmers, farm workers, and all of us are continually exposed to chemical pesticides due to their widespread use, with each of us carrying a body burden of the toxins. (2) Countless numbers of streams, rivers, and drinking water sources are degraded due to pesticide and fertilizer runoff. (3) Major portions of bays and gulfs are oxygen-starved coastal dead zones due to algal blooms that are fed by fertilizer runoff. (4) Wildlife suffer from genetic mutations due to the farming chemicals that contaminate their ponds and swamps. Notable examples: Genetic mutations in frogs and abnormal genitalia in alligators. (5) State advisories for locally caught fish are chock-full of warnings about fish species contaminated with pesticides. Would Food Production Drop Without the Green Revolution?
[I] Now to the real point—would we starve if we transitioned back to sustainable agriculture and abandoned the chemicals we’ve come to accept as a normal part of farming? No, not at all. Multiple studies, including work by the US National Research Council and a 23-year study by the Rodale Institute, found total food output from "alternative" farms to be equivalent to Green Revolution farms—and sometimes higher.
[J] Cuba provides a real-life, working model to test the conclusions of such research. When the US trade embargo was imposed on Cuba in the late 1980s, the country’s access to Green Revolution "inputs" was suddenly severely restricted. Cuba began to reorient its agriculture back to sustainable approaches based on traditional farming practices and smaller farming operations. Within a decade, the country had solved its food problem, with the added benefit of freeing itself from the cost and toxic pollution associated with imported farming chemicals. Wrap up... and GMOs
[K] As Lt. Columbo was fond of saying, just one last thing... The big agribusiness companies that brought you the hollow promises of the chemical-based Green Revolution I are now busy cooking up the genetically engineered (GE) Green Revolution n. Again they promise to save the world from hunger, but as before, their real goal is to reap bountiful profits. Not only do some GE technologies, such as "herbicide tolerance", not increase yield and farmer profits, they have been documented to have the opposite effect. In such cases, the only people benefiting are the GE seed and pesticide companies and their shareholders.
[L] There is a place for research and technology in farming, but we should stop trying to conquer nature’s complex, inexorable forces and instead should focus on approaches that work with the power of nature. A lot of research dollars went into developing Green Revolution and GE technologies. If instead we had invested in better sustainable-agriculture methods, we would have increased yields, retained healthier farming practices, and greatly lessened the huge loss of small and medium-sized farms. In fact, demonstration projects have shown that increases in total food output of up to 100% are possible by using advanced sustainable agriculture techniques. Such approaches also reduce costs and avoid the chemical pollutants and potentially dangerous GE strains that are now upon us.
[M] We won’t be able to simply flip a switch and suddenly convert all the farming acreage on the planet back to smaller, more sustainable farms overnight. But it can be done gradually, without causing mass starvation. Indeed, better health for more people would be the overall result. We in the developed countries of the world should ask our elected representatives to begin a major shift in farm policy to foster such change. We can also directly support the effort by eating organic and/or locally grown food. [N] The solution to global hunger is to solve problems related to democracy and distribution of income and food in the Third World. We should also ensure that the right to be self-sufficient when it comes to producing one’s food is not trumped by free-trade agreements. The solution to world hunger is not to develop expensive, unneeded technologies that endanger the entire food system. Just say "no"... to G-M-O... and the Green Revolution.
According to Norman Borlaug, Green Revolution is intended to increase crop production.
选项
答案
A
解析
根据increase crop production定位到A段。该段介绍诺曼.博洛格和他的“绿色革命”:它使全世界的农作物产量迅速增加,尤其是粮食作物,如小麦、玉米、大豆的产量。本题句子的production对应原文的yields。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MOT7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Ithastobelongandindetail.B、Itwillbegiveninaformalstyle.C、Itwillincludehisviewonthecompany.D、Itwillbe
A、Selectauniqueone.B、Selectafast-growingone.C、Selectanemergingone.D、Selectamatureone.C讲座中提到创业者们要选择一个新兴的产业,需求大于供给
A、Theywillbuysomethingfromtheconveniencestores.B、Theywilltakeadvantageofthetimetorestawhile.C、Theywillhave
TheMysteryoftheNazcaLines[A]IfyouvisitthePeruviancoastaldesertfromnorthtosouth,youwillnotethatsporadica
TheHistoryofChineseAmericans[A]ChinesehavebeenintheUnitedStatesforalmosttwohundredyears.Infact,theChines
A、Asimplelifestyle.B、Amoreinterestinglifeorientation.C、Excitingoutdooractivities.D、Wildnessandattractionofthenat
ManyworkerswhoworkedintheWorldTradeCenteraftertheSeptembereleventhattacksbecamesick.Theybreathedamixofdust,
ManyworkerswhoworkedintheWorldTradeCenteraftertheSeptembereleventhattacksbecamesick.Theybreathedamixofdust,
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteanessaycommentingonthepollutioninChina.Youcangiveexamp
随机试题
关于出版物购销形式的说法,错误的是()。
A、Aletterofinvitation.B、Aletterofrecommendation.C、Aletterofintroduction.D、Aletterofapplication.B
以下无毒的是
CT扫描时,球管连续旋转曝光,检查床不停顿单向移动并采集数据的方式是
患者,男,40岁。腹痛黏液便2周,下痢稀薄,带有白冻,且滑脱不禁,食少神疲,肢冷,舌淡,苔薄白,脉沉细。粪便细菌培养检出痢疾杆菌。其证型是
在预应力混凝土桥梁的控制断面布设应力(应变)测点,用于施工阶段、竣工荷载试验和长期运营的应力(应变)检测和监测,请回答以下问题。用于竣工荷载试验的应力(应变)检测,可采用()方法。
背景A公司具有机电工程建设总承包资质,经营范围包括可代理业主进行全部项目建设管理工作,直至竣工验收投入正式生产或使用。某建设单位拟扩建一民营化学试剂厂,因购入国内尚未采用的新工艺而扩建规模较大的厂房和装置,以提高产能和产品质量,由于引进的仅是工艺
甲公司向乙公司购买价值100万元的彩电,合同约定甲公司先预付20万元货款,其余80万元货款在提货后3个月内付清,并由丙公司提供连带保证担保。但未约定保证范围。提货1个月后,甲公司在征得乙公司同意后,将80万元债务转移给尚欠其80万元货款的丁公司。对此,丙公
Thelettersaidthattherewasan______,butIcouldn’tfindwhereitwas.
Thereismuchdiscussiontodayaboutwhethereconomicgrowthisdesirable.【T1】Atanearlierperiod,ourdesireformaterialweal
最新回复
(
0
)