首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
admin
2020-03-31
59
问题
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is essentially the Darwinian argument that extinction results from the inexorable process of so-called "natural selection" in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. Moreover, we humans are not exempt from the process. Accordingly, if we see fit to eradicate other species in order to facilitate our survival, then to be it. We are only behaving as animals must, Darwin would no doubt assert.
[B] As I see it, there are three fundamental arguments for imposing on ourselves at least some responsibility to preserve endangered species, The first has to do culpability. According to this argument, to the extent that endangerment is the result of anthropogenic evenis such as clear-cutting of forests or polluting of lakes and streams, we humans have a duty to take affirmative measures to protect the species whose survival we’ve placed in jeopardy.
[C] The second argument, and the one that I find most compelling, is an appeal to logic over emotion. It is a scientific fact that thousands of animal species become extinct every year. Many such extinctions are due to natural forces, while others are due to anthropogenic factors. In any event it is far beyond our ability to save them all. By what standard, then, should we decide which species are worth saving and which ones are out? In my observation, we tend to favor animals with human-like physical characteristics and behaviors. This preference is understandablei after all, dolphins are far more endearing than bugs. But there is no logical justification for such a standard. Accordingly, what makes more sense is to decide based on our own economic self-interest. In other words, the more money and jobs it would cost to save a certain species, the lower priority we should place on doing so.
[D] What are the limits of our duty to save endangered species from extinction? The statement raises a variety of issues about morality, conscience, self-preservation and economics. On balance, however, I fundamentally agree with the notion that humans need not make "extraordinary" efforts—at the expense of money and job— to ensure the preservation of any endangered species.
[E] We should appeal to self-preservation. The animal kingdom is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival. Severing certain relationships, such as that between a predator and its natural prey, can set into motion a series of extinctions that ultimately might endanger our own survival as a species. While this claim might sound far-fetched to some, environmental experts assure us that in the long run it is a very real possibility.
[F] The issue of endangered-species protection is a complex one, requiring subjective judgments about moral duty and the comparative value of various life-forms. Thus, there are no easy or certain answers. Yet it is for this very reason I agree that economic self-interest should take precedence over vague notions about moral duty when it comes to saving endangered species. In the final analysis, at a point when it becomes critical for our own survival as a species to save certain others, then we humans will do so if we are fit—in accordance with Darwin’s observed process of natural selection.
[G] The second argument has to do with capability. This argument disregards the extent to which we humans might have contributed to the endangerment of a species. Instead, the argument goes, if we are aware of the danger, know what steps are needed to prevent extinction, and can take those steps, then we are morally obligated to help prevent extinction. This argument would place a very high affirmative duty on humans to protect endangered species.
Order:
选项
答案
E
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Mn1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulouscountries.ButsinceChina【C1】______afamilyplan
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulouscountries.ButsinceChina【C1】______afamilyplan
Inthelate1960’s,manypeopleinNorthAmericaturnedtheirattentiontoenvironmentalproblems,andnewsteel-and-glassskysc
Inthelate1960’s,manypeopleinNorthAmericaturnedtheirattentiontoenvironmentalproblems,andnewsteel-and-glassskysc
Itneverrainsbutitpours.Justasbossesandboardshavefinallysortedouttheirworstaccountingandcompliancetroubles,a
Allaroundtheworld,lawyersgeneratemorehostilitythanthemembersofanyotherprofession—withthepossibleexceptionofjo
Duringthetraditionalweddingceremony,the【C1】______couplepromiseeachotherlifelongdevotion.Yet,aboutoneoutoffourAm
随机试题
多根多处肋骨骨折,伤员呼吸困难,疼痛,吸氧状态下血气分析PO28kPa(60mmHg)、PCO26.67kPa(50mmHg),SO294%,应立即()
郑贺为甲有限公司的经理,利用职务之便为其妻吴悠经营的乙公司谋取本来属于甲公司的商业机会,致甲公司损失50万元。甲公司小股东付冰欲通过诉讼维护公司利益。关于付冰的做法,下列哪一选项是正确的?
建筑工程管理(CM)方法的特点是,在建设项目初步设计文件被批准后,将施工图设计、施工招标及施工进行分阶段组织实施,并在全部工程竣工前将已完部分工程分项分批交付使用。这样有利于( )。
热水采暖系统入口装置除包括有压力表、温度计外,还应有()。
防火间距属于建筑防火设计的()。
鱼鳞图册
甲、乙二人不约而同在同一商场内行窃,各自盗窃财物数额较大。下列对甲、乙二人行为的认定,正确的是()(2009年基础课单选第14题)
如果不想在打开数据库时运行AutoExec宏,则可在打开数据库时按住()键。
如果有"学生表"(学号,姓名,专业),要将删除字段"专业"的全部内容,应使用的查询是
Thegreateconomiccrisiswas______bythepublicfearsaboutthesolvencyofthebanks.
最新回复
(
0
)