首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
admin
2015-08-29
107
问题
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked incoming students to sign a commitment to act with respect, integrity, and kindness in order to "promote understanding." Libertarian commentator Virginia Postrel, wrote that "treating ’kindness’ as the way to civil discourse doesn’t show students how to argue with accuracy and respect. " Harry R. Lewis, a former dean of Harvard College and someone with an excellent perspective on undergraduate education, warned that it impinged on freedom of thought and that "a student would be breaking the pledge if she woke up one morning and decided it was more important to achieve intellectually than to be kind."
Has empathy become the new scapegoat in the long-standing concern about academic attainment in American schools? Books like Academically Adrift chart the decline in academic rigor on American college campuses, citing the plummeting hours that students spend on studying and critical thinking skills. But there’s also been a troubling, and concurrent decrease in empathy over the past thirty years. A study of 14,000 college students published in Personality and Social Psychology Review in 2011 showed that the majority of college students today are less empathetic than their predecessors of prior decades. And other research even shows that education(like medical school!)can actually wring the empathy out of students.
Many people are squeamish about calls to increase empathy in young people because they wrongly assume that the ability to empathize is incompatible with traits like logic, reason, and impartiality. We’ve now entered a debate about how nice we should be or, rather, how nice we can afford to be and still stay competitive as a society, clinging to the pernicious belief that anything beneficial to young people must be painful and that we are in a rat race that is a zero-sum game.
In fact, there need be no tradeoff, at Harvard or anywhere else, between intellectual rigor and kindness. This is a false dichotomy, like the belief that a sick person must choose between a competent doctor and a humane one. Indeed, empathetic behavior listening well, for example actually makes a doctor better able to diagnose and treat illness, and studies show that when doctors are empathetic, their patients need less medication to relieve pain and less time to heal wounds.
People often equate empathy with gentleness and passivity. But empathy is really just a cognitive walk in another person’s shoes. An empathetic person is, fundamentally, a curious and imaginative person. Empathy involves a search for understanding. And we need today’s students to understand the world better in order to respond to its seemingly intractable problems.
Many educators agree that the intellectual skills required for the 21st century depend on not only a mastery of facts and figures, but also on complex communication, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation. We live in a more open society than ever, with greater mixing of people and ideas.
The ability to master a new language, to translate scientific findings into policy, or to weave the concerns of one field into the terms of another(the way a Macintosh computer melds engineering and design), requires students to step outside of their own life experience and habits of mind. Steve Jobs had empathy for his customers.
Of course, we can always find examples of world-class thinkers who are oblivious to people’s feelings. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the vast majority of students will need to assume the perspective of others in order to get ahead in life. We can call this empathy. Or we can call it 21st century learning. It’s both. Empathy doesn’t always lead to more moral behavior, but it can lead to more intelligent behavior.
The author believes that
选项
A、empathy doesn’t affect college students’ performance.
B、empathy contributes to the development of logic and reason.
C、a doctor must be a person with great empathy and skills.
D、a doctor’s empathy is more effective than medication.
答案
B
解析
推断题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MpOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoSharon,whoisthemostlylikelytofallvictimtohemochromatosis?
AccordingtoSharon,whoisthemostlylikelytofallvictimtohemochromatosis?
AmericanLiteratureAliteratureistherecordofhumanexperienceandpeoplehavealwaysbeenimpelledtowritedowntheirimpr
Lawrence’srepresentativework______waspositivelytakenasatypicalexampleandlivelymanifestationoftheOedipusComplex
WhichofthefollowingwritersisnottherepresentativeofModernisminthe20thcentury?
Whichofthefollowingwordsdoesnotbelongtotheopenclass?
Anidealcollegeshouldbeacommunity,aplaceofclose,natural,intimateassociation,notonlyoftheyoungmenwhoareitsp
ClaremontMcKennaCollege,asmall,prestigiousCaliforniaschool,admittedthatithassubmittedfalseSATscorestopublicati
Thebizarreanticsofsleepwalkershavepuzzledpolice,perplexedscientists,andfascinatedwritersforcenturies.Thereisan
ThemetropolitanpoliceforceofLondonisunderthedirectcontrolof______.
随机试题
使用VC6打开考生文件夹下的工程test28_3。此工程包含一个test28_3.cpp,其中定义了类Person,但该类的定义并不完整。请按要求完成下列操作,将程序补充完整。(1)定义类Person的私有数据成员forename、surname
发动机排量不超过_________L的轿车,称为微型轿车。
试述《等待戈多》的艺术成就。
A.Zollinger一Ellison综合征B.Gardner综合征C.Peutz—Jegher综合征D.Budd—chiari综合征(2013年第148题)完全与恶性肿瘤无关的是
高血压脑出血最常见的诱因是
患者,女,20岁。因喉炎而服用磺胺药物,继见皮肤红斑及血疱,口腔、阴部黏膜糜烂,伴有口干、便秘、溲赤、舌红苔薄、脉细数。诊断为固定性红斑型药疹,内治应首选
以下关于法与道德的说法正确的是:
已知某建设项目招标过程中,规定的投标截止时间为2014年8月20日上午10:00,则在不推迟投标截止时间的前提下,招标文件澄清的最晚时间是()。
Governmentsthatwanttheirpeopletoprosperintheburgeoningworldeconomyshouldguaranteetwobasicrights:therighttopr
Thankyouallforcomingtodaytohearaboutthenewrecyclingprogramon【B1】______.Rightnowallrecyclingisvoluntary,but
最新回复
(
0
)