首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
48
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/N6Jd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AtdawnonemorninginearlyMay,SeanCosgroveisstashingpilesofmaps,notesandphotocopieddocumentsinhisgymbagbefore
YouwillhearaconversationbetweenMissGreen,aneducationaljournalist,andProfessorWilson,anexpertineducationalstudi
Youhavereadanarticleinamagazinewhichstates,"TheInternethasnowbecomeanimportantlearningtoolforchildren,expo
YouwillhearaspeechbyBobChase,PresidentoftheNationalEducationAssociation(NEA)totheAmericanAssociationofColleges
Therewasatimeinthelate17thcenturywhennorespectablemonarchwouldbeseenwithoutaguitar.BothLouisXIVandCharle
YouwillhearaninterviewwithProf.JesseAusubelabouthisoptimisticattitudestowardsenvironmentalissuestoday.Asyouli
Whenmymotherlearnedshewaspregnantwithme,myparentssatdownoneSundaymorningtoreviewtheirfinances.Turningonthe
A=RotherhitheB=BarnesC=WillesdenD=King’sCrossWhichcity...usedtohavelotofproblemssuchasdrugs,streetc
Whenwaseurolaunched?
Whenwaseurolaunched?
随机试题
国民收入可以表示为()
A、下颌后牙颊尖舌斜面从中央窝沿上后牙舌尖颊斜面向舌侧继续滑行,约到一半处分离B、下颌后牙舌尖颊斜面沿上后牙颊尖舌斜面向舌侧继续滑行,约到一半处分离C、工作侧上下颌后牙的同名尖彼此相对D、由正中袷向上、向前、向上至对刃E、由
不符合代理法律特征的内容是( )。
简述《国家学生体质健康标准》中50米跑的测试方法。
【2015年下】学科组长匡老师从教30年,每逢他们组有新人职的老师,匡老师都会把自己的教案直接提供给他们,要求他们严格按照自己的教学设计开展教学,并坚持推门听课。匡老师的做法()。
根据课程内容的组织形式,可以把课程类型分为()。
圆A的半径比圆B的半径长2厘米,则我们可以肯定圆A与圆B的()。
有以下程序 #include<stdio.h> main() { intk=2,m=4,n=6,*pk=&k,*pm=&m,*p; *(p=&n)=*pk*(*pm); printf("%d\n",n); } 程序运行后的输出
•Readtheatriclebelowabouttheneedofemployees.•ChoosethecorrectwordtofilleachgapfrOmA.BorContheopposit
Howdidthemangetthetickettotravelintospace?
最新回复
(
0
)