首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
64
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/N6Jd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Supermarketshoppershaveneverbeenmorespoiltforchoice.Butjustwhenwethoughttraditionalsystemsofselectivefarmingh
YouwillhearaninterviewwithMikeRowe,hostoftheAmericanTVshowDirtyJobs.Asyoulisten,answerthequestionsorcompl
YouwillhearaspeechbyBobChase,PresidentoftheNationalEducationAssociation(NEA)totheAmericanAssociationofColleges
Howdowemeasuretheeconomicreturntohighereducation?Typicallyitiscalculatedasthedifferencebetweenaveragewagesof
HowoldistheearliestsurvivingexamplesofChineseprinting?
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
Whenmymotherlearnedshewaspregnantwithme,myparentssatdownoneSundaymorningtoreviewtheirfinances.Turningonthe
SoftwarepiracyproblemsexistandhavebeenexacerbatedinrecentyearsduetoISoverload,decentralizedpurchasing,budgetc
I’dliketoproposethatforsixtytoninetyminuteseveryeveningfightaftertheearlyeveningnews,alltelevisionbroa
I’dliketoproposethatforsixtytoninetyminuteseveryeveningfightaftertheearlyeveningnews,alltelevisionbroa
随机试题
肿瘤压迫喉返神经引起的咳嗽为【】
高渗性脱水的临床特点是
A.由发布地工商行政管理部门审查B.由发布地省级药品监督管理部门备案C.无需审查D.由发布地省级药品监督管理部门审批根据《药品广告审查办法》,异地发布药品广告的()
填筑上石坝的黏性土料含水量偏低时,应优先考虑在()加水。
在加工贸易活动中,下列那些情况必须纳入保证金台帐管理?
2012年12月26日,甲公司与乙公司签订了一份不可撤销的销售合同,双方约定,2013年3月20日,甲公司应按每台50万元的价格向乙公司提供B产品6台。2012年12月31日,甲公司还没有生产该批B产品,但持有的库存C材料专门用于生产B产品,可生产B产品6
下列选项中,正确的说法有________。
马绍尔群岛是在古老玄武岩基岩上形成的珊瑚礁,以环礁居多,科学家研究发现位于图中M处的诺克斯环礁1905年突然消失,百年后开始“复活”,新的小岛在废墟中重生。据此回答问题。诺克斯环礁迅速复活的主要原因是()。
从时间上分,公安机关的任务包括()
“由于香港法律制度中的某些基本概念,法官的职能不是造法而是解释成文法。法官依照一些周知的规则和解释的推断米解释成文法。”解释并评述上述话语。(1991年12月)
最新回复
(
0
)