首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
75
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/N6Jd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AnswerQuestions71to80byreferringtothe3articlesonjuveniledelinquency.AnswereachquestionbychoosingA,BorCand
YouwillhearaconversationbetweenMissGreen,aneducationaljournalist,andProfessorWilson,anexpertineducationalstudi
YouwillhearaninterviewwithStevenCasey,onhumanfactorsindesign.Asyoulisten,answerthequestionsorcompletetheno
YouwillhearaninterviewwithProf.JesseAusubelabouthisoptimisticattitudestowardsenvironmentalissuestoday.Asyouli
OnNovember5th1605,abandofEnglishCatholichotheadsplannedtodetonate36barrelsofgunpowderundertheHouseofLords.
Whatarethespeakerstryingtodo?
YouwillhearaninterviewwithProf.JesseAusubelabouthisoptimisticattitudestowardsenvironmentalissuestoday.Asyouli
Lastyear,howmanyflightstraveledthroughO’HareaccordingtotheFederalAviationAdministration?
TheFBI(FederalBureauofInvestigation)hadfoundanewwaytocatchcriminalsbylookingattheirjeans.Scientistsfromthe
Whatdoeseachvanitystampcost?
随机试题
产品导入期的营销策略有()
试述10种孕妇应禁用或慎用的药物及其危害性。
功血依据的分类标准是()
患者32岁,结婚6年不孕,月经量减少1年。妇科检查:子宫略小,活动受限,双侧宫旁增厚,可触及结节数个,约黄豆大小,子宫输卵管造影见子宫腔边缘呈锯齿状,输卵管管腔细小、僵硬。红细胞沉降率正常。对该患者最适宜的处理是下述哪项方法
A.他达拉非B.甲睾酮C.西地那非D.丙酸睾酮E.度他雄胺血浆半衰期较长的治疗男性勃起功能障碍的5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂的是
下列开展灭火和疏散逃生演练的活动中,错误的是()
单位和个人办理结算,因错填结算凭证,致使银行对结算凭证或对款项不能解付,影响资金使用的,应由( )。
《中华人民共和国教育法》规定,明知校舍或者教育教学设施有危险,而不采取措施,造成人员伤亡或者重大财产损失的,对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员,依法追究()。
艾滋病是一种危害性极大的传染病,它使人体丧失免疫功能,病死率较高。据调查,艾滋病病毒可能是中非热带雨林地区的当地人在杀猴之时,因接触猴血而受到传染,或者是在饲养和捕捉猴子时遭到咬、抓造成皮肤损伤,使这种病原体乘机钻进了人体。经医学研究,艾滋病病毒主要通过性
AairBashCearthDgrassEsticksFsto
最新回复
(
0
)