首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) It’s a golden age for studying inequality. Thomas Piketty, a French economist, set the benchmark in 2014 when his book, Capi
(1) It’s a golden age for studying inequality. Thomas Piketty, a French economist, set the benchmark in 2014 when his book, Capi
admin
2018-06-29
48
问题
(1) It’s a golden age for studying inequality. Thomas Piketty, a French economist, set the benchmark in 2014 when his book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, was published in English and became a bestseller. The book mapped the contours of the crisis with a sweeping theory of economic history. Inequality, which had been on the wane from the 1930s until the 1970s, had risen sharply back toward the high levels of the Industrial Revolution, he argued. Now Branko Milanovic, an economist at the Luxembourg Income Study Centre and the City University of New York, has written a comprehensive follow-up. It reinforces how little is really known about economic forces of long duration.
(2) In some ways Global Inequality is a less ambitious book than Capital. It is shorter, and written more like an academic working paper than a work of substantial scholarship for a wider readership.
(3) Like Mr. Piketty, he begins with piles of data assembled over years of research. He sets the trends of different individual countries in a global context. Over the past 30 years the incomes of workers in the middle of the global income distribution have soared, as has pay for the richest 1%. At the same time, incomes of the working class in advanced economies have stagnated. This dynamic helped create a global middle class. It also caused global economic inequality to plateau, and perhaps even decline, for the first time since industrialisation began.
(4) To help interpret these facts, Mr. Milanovic provides the readers with a series of neat mental models. He muses, for instance, that at the dawn of industrialisation, inequality within countries (or class-based inequality) was responsible for the largest gaps between rich people and poor. After industrialisation, inequality across countries (or location-based inequality) became more important. But as gaps between countries become ever more narrow, class-based inequality will become more important as most of the differences in incomes between rich people and poor people will once again be due to gaps within countries. He seasons the discussion with interesting comments, such as how incomes and inequality fell over the course of the Roman Empire.
(5) Mr. Milanovic’s boldest contribution is about "Kuznets waves", which he offers as an alternative to two other prevailing theories of inequality. Simon Kuznets, a 20th-century economist, argued that inequality is low at low levels of development, rises during industrialisation and falls as countries reach economic maturity; high inequality is the temporary side-effect of the developmental process. Mr. Piketty offered an alternative explanation: that high levels of inequality are the natural state of modern economies. Only unusual events, like the two world wars and the Depression of the 1930s, disrupt that normal equilibrium.
(6) Mr. Milanovic suggests that both are mistaken. Across history, he reckons, inequality has tended to flow in cycles; Kuznets waves. In the pre-industrial period, these waves were governed by Malthusian dynamics: inequality would rise as countries enjoyed a spell of good fortune and high incomes, then fall as war or famine dragged average income back to subsistence level. With industrialisation, the forces creating Kuznets waves changed; to technology, openness and policy (TOP, as he shortens it). In the 19th century technological advance, globalisation and policy shifts all worked together in mutually reinforcing ways to produce dramatic economic change. Workers were reallocated from farms to factories, average incomes and inequality soared and the world became unprecedentedly interconnected. Then a combination of forces, some malign (war and political upheaval) and some benign (increased education) squeezed inequality to the lows of the 1970s.
(7) Since then, the rich world has been riding a new Kuznets wave, propelled by another era of economic change. Technological progress and trade work together to squeeze workers, he says; cheap technology made in foreign economies undermines the bargaining power of rich-world workers directly, and makes it easier for firms to replace people with machines. Workers’ declining economic power is compounded by lost political power as the very rich use their fortunes to influence candidates and elections.
(8) This diagnosis carries with it a predictive element. Mr. Milanovic expects rich-world inequality to keep rising, in America especially, before eventually declining. Importantly, he argues that the downswing in inequality that occurs on the backside of a Kuznets wave is an inevitable result of the preceding rise. Where Mr. Piketty sees the inequality-compressing historical events of the early 20th century as an accident, Mr. Milanovic believes them to be the direct result of soaring inequality. The search for foreign investment opportunities engendered imperialism and set the stage for war. There are parallels, if imperfect ones, to the modern economy; rich economies seem to be stagnating as the very rich struggle to find places to earn good returns on their piles of wealth.
(9) Mr. Milanovic’s analysis leads him to consider some dark possibilities as he looks ahead. America looks to be falling into the grips of an undemocratic plutocracy (富豪统治), he says, which is dependent on an expanding security state. In Europe right-wing nativism (本土主义) is on the rise. The good news is that emerging economies will probably continue on their path toward rich-world incomes—though that, he allows, is not guaranteed, and could be threatened by political crisis in other markets.
(10) The book’s conclusion is a little unsatisfying. A theory in which rising inequality eventually triggers countervailing social dislocations feels intuitively right, but it also leaves many important questions unanswered. When is war, rather than revolution, the probable outcome of inequality? Are governments at the mercy of the cycle, or can they act pre-emptively to flatten out the waves and avoid crises of high inequality? Mr. Milanovic’s contributions are ultimately similar to those made by Mr. Piketty. The data he provides offer a clearer picture of great economic puzzles, and his bold theorising chips away at tired economic orthodoxies. But the grand theory does as much to reveal the scale of contemporary ignorance as to illuminate the mechanics of the global economy.
It can be concluded from the last paragraph that the author holds a (n) ______ view towards Mr. Milanovic’s book.
选项
A、subjective
B、objective
C、positive
D、negative
答案
B
解析
态度题。最后一段开头提到《全球不平等》一书的缺点,作者认为结论有点令人失望,留下了许多重要的问题没有解答。但作者又在最后两句提到该书的优点:米兰诺维克在书中提供的数据更为清晰地展示了重大的经济难题,他那大胆的理论削弱了陈腐的经济学正统观点,揭示了当代无知的程度,还阐明了世界经济的运行机制。由此可以判断作者对米兰诺维克的书籍持客观态度,既有批评也有褒奖,故[B]为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NBEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
PassageFourWhatfunctiondoesthefirstsentenceinthesecondparagraphserve?
PassageThreeWhatistheroleofParagraphFiveinthedevelopmentofthetopic?
PassageOne
Intheolddays,historians—atleastsomeofthem—werepatrioticandmoralistic.Nolonger.WeliveinwhatAndrewFerguson,in
Meadowlarksareaboutthesamesizethanrobins,buttheyhaveheavierbodies,shortertails,andlongerbills.
IhavebeenteachingforlongerthanIcaretosay,andalwaysofferacourseforenteringfreshmen.AndI’vediscoveredsomet
Congestedcitiesarefastbecomingtesttubesforscientistsstudyingtheimpactoftrafficfumesonthebrain.Asroadwayscho
Congestedcitiesarefastbecomingtesttubesforscientistsstudyingtheimpactoftrafficfumesonthebrain.Asroadwayscho
FiveGoldenRulesforGivingAcademicPresentationsAcademicpresentationsaredifferentfromtheclassroompresentationsthats
HowtoWriteaCollegeTermPaper?I.Tip1:Figureoutexactlywhattheprofessorwants.Read【T1】_____verycarefully.【T1】_
随机试题
以下关于卖出看跌期权的说法,正确的有()。Ⅰ.如果预期标的物价格上涨,可卖出看跌期权Ⅱ.卖出看跌期权比卖出标的期货可获得更高的收益Ⅲ.如果现货持仓者担心价格下跌,可卖出看跌期权对冲风险Ⅳ.如果对手行权,看跌期权卖方可对冲持有的标
正常成人颅内压增高是指压力大于()
复苏中肾上腺素能药物首选
红细胞渗透脆性降低见于
在管路的水力计算中,下述关于长管和短管、简单管路与复杂管路的说法,正确的是()。
比率法的特点是把对比分析的数值变成相对数,再观察其相互之间的关系。常用的方法有()。
根据下列资料,回答问题。2014年12月,我国房地产业土地购置面积4062万平方米,同比增长6.5%,土地成交价款1000亿元。同比增长8.9%。2013年1—2月,商业营业用房竣工面积约是办公楼的多少倍?
甲在公共汽车上窃取乙人民币3000元,下车时被乙发现,在将其扭送派出所的途中,甲猛地将乙打倒在地,窜入一死胡同,被群众抓获,甲的行为应认定为()。
OneofthemostbeautifulnaturalwondersintheUnitedStatesmustcertainlybetheGrandCanyon,______inArizona.
GlobalizationisanewinternationalsystemthathasreplacedtheColdWarsystem.However,unlesstheworldweremadeofjust【M
最新回复
(
0
)