首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) There’s this great recurring Saturday Night Live skit from several years back where Phil Hartman plays an unfrozen caveman w
(1) There’s this great recurring Saturday Night Live skit from several years back where Phil Hartman plays an unfrozen caveman w
admin
2019-06-01
58
问题
(1) There’s this great recurring Saturday Night Live skit from several years back where Phil Hartman plays an unfrozen caveman who goes to law school. He pontificates (发表武断的意见) on the American judicial system while marveling at modern technology like The Tiny People in The Magic Box (a TV). It fits a common stereotype: Human ancestors were, well, cavemen, and not as smart as we are today. A new hypothesis from a Stanford geneticist tries to turn this stereotype upside down.
(2) Human intelligence may have actually peaked before our ancient predecessors ever left Africa, Gerald Crabtree writes in two new journal articles. Genetic mutations during the past several millennia are causing a decline in overall human intellectual and emotional fitness, he says. Evolutionary pressure no longer favors intellect, so the problem is getting worse. He is careful to say that this is taking quite a long time, so it’s not like your grandparents are models of brilliance while your children will be cavemen rivaling Hartman’s SNL character. But he does maintain that an ancient Athenian, plucked from 1000 BC, would be " among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions. "
(3) His central thesis is that each generation produces deleterious (有害的) mutations, so down the line of human history, our intelligence is ever more impaired compared to that of our predecessors.
(4) Not surprisingly, the hypothesis, published in the journal Trends in Genetics, has several geneticists scratching their heads.
(5) "It takes thousands of genes to build a human brain, and mutations in any one of those can impair that process, that’s absolutely true. It’s also true that with each new generation, new mutations arise...but Crabtree ignores the other side of the equation, which is selection," said Kevin Mitchell, associate professor at the Smurfit Institute of Genetics at Trinity College Dublin. " Natural selection is incredibly powerful, and it definitely has the ability to weed out new mutations that significantly impair intellectual ability. There are various aspects in these papers that I think are really just thinking about things in a wrong way. "
(6) Crabtree said he wanted to examine the cumulative effect of generation-to-generation mutation on intelligence, which is thought to be controlled by many genes. Using indexes that measure X-chromosome-related mental retardation, he comes up with between 2,000 and 5,000 genes related to human intellectual ability. Using another index measuring average mutations that arise in each generation of children, he calculates that within 3,000 years, " we have all sustained two or more mutations harmful to our intellectual or emotional stability. "
(7) " There is a general feeling that evolution constantly improves us, but it only does that if there is selection applied," Crabtree said in an interview. " In this case, it is questionable about how much selection is occurring now compared to the process of optimizing those genes, which occurred in the jungles of Africa 500,000 years ago."
(8) There’s already evidence for this in other areas, he argues: Take our sense of smell. Humans have far fewer olfactory receptors than other animals, he said—we’re guided by our intellect now, not by smell. We can think about where a piece of food came from, how it was processed, which plant it’s from, who has been around it, and so on. A dog, on the other hand, simply sniffs something and either eats it or doesn’t.
(9) Similarly, he believes evolution now selects for other traits—namely, the most healthy and the most immune, not the most intelligent.
(10) But geneticists took issue with his claims, not to mention his citations and methods. Mitchell took issue with Crabtree’s characterization of genes—he describes them as links in a chain, with incredible overall disruptive power. They’re like a bulb on a string of Christmas tree lights that suddenly fails to work, taking out the entire strand with it: " It can be concluded that genes related to intelligence do not operate as a robust network, but rather as links in a chain, failure of any one of which leads to intellectual disability," he writes. Mitchell countered that this ignores other genes that don’t cause intellectual disability.
(11) "Biological systems are robust to degradation of several different components," Mitchell said. "Evolution has gone to a lot of trouble to craft your genome so it’s finely honed to do its job, and it doesn’t make sense that you would have all this random mutation in your brain cells. Also, you would have a very high rate of brain cancer. "
Which of the following would be the BEST title for the passage?
选项
A、A New Hypothesis Against a Common Stereotype.
B、The Pros and Cons of Genetic Mutations.
C、Human Intelligence—Declined or Not?
D、Evolution Process and Human Intellect.
答案
C
解析
主旨大意题。作者以一部滑稽短剧开场,借古论今,指出剧中反映了现代人比人类祖先更聪明这一普遍观点,随后笔锋一转,介绍了遗传学家克拉布特提出的新假说,即现代人不一定比他们的祖先聪明,甚至在过去几千年间人类的智力正在逐渐衰退。作者接着介绍了克拉布特的主要观点、实验内容和方法,同时陈述了另一位遗传学家凯文-米切尔对克拉布特假说的反驳。综上所述,C“人类智力已经走下坡路了吗?”最能概括全文大意,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NBbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Englishservesasafunctionalalternativelanguageinseveralareasofpublicactivityforthemanynationsoftheworldwhich
AtthetimewhentheUnitedStatessplitofffromBritain,therewereproposalsindependenceshouldbelinguistically【S1】______
OnPublicSpeakingI.People’sfrequentresponsetogivingtheirfirstspeech:feel【T1】______【T1】______II.Thespeaker’ssecret
Nearlyeverycountryinthedevelopedworld,andmoreandmoreinthedevelopingworld,providefreeprimaryandsecondaryeduca
CrossCulturalBusinessPresentationsWithinthebusinessenvironment,understandingandcopingwithinterculturaldifferencesb
CrossCulturalBusinessPresentationsWithinthebusinessenvironment,understandingandcopingwithinterculturaldifferencesb
CrossCulturalAdvertisingAsuccessfulcrossculturaladvertisingcampaignlargelydependsoneffectivecrossculturalcommunic
IsEnglishAppropriateforaGlobalLanguage?SeveralintrinsicfeaturesofEnglishlanguagehavemadeitanappropriatechoice
ShouldYouLearnThai?HereareeightfeaturesaboutThailanguagetohelpstudentsdecidewhethertheywanttolearnThaiorno
A、In2012.B、In2003.C、In1961.D、In1954.A句(1)中,女士介绍PaulHendrickson时说,在2012年他因为一本关于海明威的书获得了人生中的第二次HeartlandPrize。因此答案为[A]。
随机试题
在考生文件夹下,“samp1.accdb”数据库文件中已建立两个表对象(名为“员工表”和“部门表”)和一个窗体对象(名为“fEmp”)。试按以下要求顺序,完成表及窗体的各种操作。将窗体对象“fEmp”的记录源设置为表对象“员工表"。
应用象征性的标记来宣传组织形象执行的原则是()。
患者,女性,38岁,患"急性尿道炎"。症见小便短赤而频数,溺时涩痛,淋漓不畅,口燥咽干,小腹急满,舌红苔黄腻。脉滑数者。治宜选用
质量不符合约定的,如果根据约定或《合同法》有关规定均不能确定如何承担违约责任的,受损害方根据标的物性质及损失大小,可以合理选择()。
余额试算平衡是根据会计恒等式的平衡关系检验账户记录的正确性。()
邮政综合计算机网是覆盖()的大型企业网。
《旅行社条例实施细则》属于旅游行业的()。
2018年2月9日,第二十三届冬季奥林匹克运动会在韩国()开幕。
道德行为是指在一定的道德意识支配下表现出来的具有道德意义并能对此进行道德评价的行为,与“非道德行为”相对,包括道德的行为和不道德的行为两大类。不同时代、民族、社会和阶级对这两类行为有不同的标准。一般来说,道德的行为是有利于他人和社会的行为,反之则为不道德行
一、注意事项1.本题本由给定资料与作答要求两部分构成。考试时限为150分钟。其中,阅读给定资料参考时限为40分钟,作答参考时限为110分钟。2.请在题本、答题卡指定位置上用黑色字迹的钢笔或签字笔填写自己的姓名和准考证号,并用2B铅笔在准
最新回复
(
0
)