首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2013-09-28
62
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farrell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farrell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident".
In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another. In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
细节题。该文章最后一段中提到人们“be aroused resentment”的原因,包括A political power,B high fares和D indifference,只有C 没有提及,所以答案为C
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NRLK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whatarethepossiblerelationshipbetweenthemanandthewoman?
Itisnecessarythathe______theassignmentwithoutdelay.
Nowadaystourismismoreandmoreindispensabletopeople’slife.Butwhichwayisabetterchoice:joiningpackagetourortrav
Giventhebriefestofglancesatapicture,mostpeoplebelievetheyhavenothadtimetorecognizeanythinginitatall.Askt
Caraccountfor______thegreenhousegasesintheUS.
Theearthquakeof26thDecember2004resultedinoneoftheworstnaturaldisastersinlivingmemory.Itwasa【C1】______underwa
Sheisas______ashermotherisbeautiful.
Ph.Dstudentswhohaven’tcompletedtheirdissertationsbythetimetheirfellowshipsexpirefaceadifficult
Yourgreatfinancialburdendoesnotjustifyyour______yourparentsinsucharelentlessway.
TheartteacherwhoaccusedPrinceHarryofcheatinghaswonhercaseagainstEtonCollegeforunfairdismissal.SarahForsy
随机试题
理想的追求和实现是一个
变应性炎症属
不会导致组织水肿的因素是
以降逆化痰,益气和胃为主要功用的方剂是
某抗震等级为二级的钢筋混凝土结构框架柱,其纵向受力钢筋(HRB400)的直径为25mm,采用钢筋混凝土扩展基础,基础底面形状为正方形,基础中的插筋构造如图16—17(Z)所示,基础的混凝土强度等级为C30。试问,当锚固长度修正系数ξ取1.0时,柱纵向
某公司上年年末支付每股股息为2元,预期回报率为15%,未来3年中超常态增长率为20%,随后的增长率为8%,则股票的价值为( )元。
某公司拟进行股票投资,计划购买A、B、C三种股票。已知A、B股票的β系数分别为1.5、1.0,C股票收益率与市场组合收益率的相关系数为0.8,C股票的标准差为12.5%。该公司建立的投资组合中A、B、C股票的投资比重分别为50%、30%和20%。同期市场
在游客观看景区节目时,讲解员应自始至终()。
一、注意事项1.申论考试是对考生阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题能力以及文字表达能力的测试。2.仔细阅读给定资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”。二、给定资料材料一:2008年6月28日,解放军第一医院收治了第一例因
《租借法案》
最新回复
(
0
)