首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparato
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparato
admin
2020-04-01
39
问题
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as a prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we’ ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn ’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.
We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible,and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures—professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams—selective schools do slightly worse.
By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2%~4% for every 100-point increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke. A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.
Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason is that so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into college is not life only competition. Old-boy networks are breaking down. Princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D. program. High scores on the GRE helped explain who got in; degrees of prestigious universities didn’t.
So, parents, lighten up. The stakes have been vastly exaggerated. Up to a point, we can rationalize our pushiness. America is a competitive society; our kids need to adjust to that, but too much pushiness can be destructive. The very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment. One study found that, other things being equal, graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction. They may have been so conditioned to being on top that anything less disappoints.
One possible result of pushing children into elite universities is that______.
选项
A、they earn less than their peers from other institutions
B、they turn out to be less competitive in the job market
C、they overemphasize their qualifications in job application
D、they experience more job dissatisfaction after graduation
答案
D
解析
细节题。文中最后一段提到,graduates of highly selective schools experiencedmore job dissatisfaction,即更好的学校教育使得他们在工作中会经历更多的不满意,D选项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NUd7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
ThestudywaswrittenandresearchedbyBritain’sNationalConsumerCouncil(NCC)forlobbygroupConsumerInternational.Itwa
ThestudywaswrittenandresearchedbyBritain’sNationalConsumerCouncil(NCC)forlobbygroupConsumerInternational.Itwa
ThestudywaswrittenandresearchedbyBritain’sNationalConsumerCouncil(NCC)forlobbygroupConsumerInternational.Itwa
A、Itiseasiertochangeothersthanchangeyourself.B、Whatisamostcommonannoyingtypeofbosslike.C、Howtokeeparelati
A、Nationwide.B、Overseas.C、Inlargecities.D、Inremotetowns.C细节推断题。由particularlyinbigcityhavecomplainedaboutdroppedc
A、$1million.B、$2million.C、$3million.D、$4million.B细节推断题。由“Usuallyitisbetween$50and$70tobuyatextbookforeachs
Thetypicalpre-industrialfamilynotonlyhadagoodmanychildren,butnumerousother【C1】______aswell—grandparents,uncles,a
FormanyAmericans,2013endedwithanunusuallybittercoldspell.LateNovemberandDecember【C1】______earlysnowandbone-chil
Asateacher,youcouldbringthecommunityintoyourclassroominmanyways.Theparentsandgrandparentsofyourstudentsare
Asateacher,youcouldbringthecommunityintoyourclassroominmanyways.Theparentsandgrandparentsofyourstudentsare
随机试题
以托马斯主义哲学为理论依据,对当时的方兴未艾的实用主义和进步主义教育的理论和实践提出了批评的教育理论思潮是
男,72岁,慢性胃炎30年,近2周出现发作性胸痛,伴反酸、烧心、呃逆。要确诊胃食管反流病,最主要的检查是
增感屏的使用注意事项中,错误的是
流行病学三角模型包含的三大因素是()
A.CYP3A4抑制剂B.CYP3A4诱导剂C.CYP2C19底物药物D.CYP1A21底物药物E.CYP2D6抑制剂利福平属于
如图,求阴影部分的周长(非阴影部分为一个半圆)。
科学安排学前儿童运动量应遵循的原则是()。
理论:实践:指导
按照法的适用范围的不同,法可以分为()。
DoesGeneticResearchThreatenOurCivilLiberties?TheCurrentGeneticResearchThescienceofgeneticsisaflourishin
最新回复
(
0
)