首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
admin
2015-10-21
41
问题
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished theorist of liberalism was indeed a brilliant talker and feline gossip. Readers of Berlin’s letters will find that same bubbling flow of malice, wit and human insight on the written page.
A first set of letters came out five years ago. To coincide with Berlin’s centenary year—he lived from 1909 to 1997—his literary executor, Henry Hardy, and a team of co-editors have now brought out a second fat volume. The verbal pressure is higher still, for in 1949 Berlin began dictating to a machine.
Biographically the letters take the reader through Berlin’s professional ascent from clever young don to Oxford professor, public educator and transatlantic academic star. They track the consolidation of his social position as an intellectual jewel of the post-war British establishment. Three or four footnotes a page introduce perhaps 1,000 or more politicians, public servants, academics, musicians and socialites whom Berlin knew or talked about. For that alone, his letters are a unique record of a bygone milieu.
Berlin did not write on oath. He ladles praise on correspondents only to dismiss them in letters to others as gorgons or third-raters. During the Suez crisis in 1956 he writes to the wife of the Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden, that her husband has shown "great moral splendour". The next letter, to Berlin’s stepson at Harvard, calls the British action "childish folly". His capsule judgments are sometimes apt, sometimes sneering. He calls Sir Peter Strawson, an eminent contemporary philosopher, provincial. Berlin is sharper still on his own thin-skinned self. He belittles his large philosophical gifts, finds publication an agony and worries to correspondents that his work is rot.
Mr. Hardy says that these letters represent perhaps a fourth of those Berlin wrote in 1946-1960. There are none back to him. So here is Berlin in his own ironical voice, as selected by editors. A reader only of these letters may well ask why Berlin had such grateful pupils and devoted friends. And why was he among the foremost liberal thinkers of the age? A selection of old and new tributes, The Book of Isaiah, also edited by the tireless Mr. Hardy, partly answers both questions.
Thinkers such as John Rawls defended liberal principles with more argument. Among historians of ideas, Quentin Skinner did more to professionalise their discipline. No one had Berlin’s gift for dramatising and personalising abstract ideas.
Berlin kept returning to three core convictions. Freedom from constraint by others(negative liberty)is more urgent or basic, he argued, than freedom to realise your potential(positive liberty). The left distrusted that distinction and the right misappropriated it, while philosophers continue to pick it over. He thought, secondly, that liberalism fails if it cannot validate the universal need to belong.
But perhaps Berlin’s strongest conviction was that the basic commitments—to friendship and truth, fairness and liberty, family and achievement, nation and principle—clash routinely and cannot be smoothly reconciled. Thinkers and politicians should admit the conflicts, Berlin implied, and not blanket them with doctrine or tyrannically attempt to subordinate some concerns to others.
The first two of those ideas crop up here and there in these letters. In personal form, that third conviction—that people are to be taken in full, not in formulae—runs throughout, and was surely one source of Berlin’s charm. More volumes of letters are to follow. Readers will wonder what self-mocking Berlin would have made of this growing monument. He was an erudite wit at the dinner table and, as the reader now sees, in his letters. But he was a thinker first, and for his thought there is no substitute for his essays.
The last paragraph implies that Berlin’s letters______.
选项
A、present a different image of Berlin
B、reflect conflicts among Berlin’s three convictions
C、are not the best source to learn Berlin’s thought
D、reveal flaws in Berlin’s philosophical theory
答案
C
解析
推断题。该段最后一句开头的“but”表示语义的转折,并强调伯林的首要角色是思想家,要研究学习他的思想,最好的依据是他的论文,他的书信是无法替代这一作用的,故[C]为正确答案。文章第一段表明伯林的信中体现了他的恶念、智趣与人性洞察力,但并未强调信件揭示出伯林形象的另一面,故排除[A];文中也未提及伯林的三个核心信念之间的矛盾,或者他的哲学学说中存在什么缺陷,故排除[B]和[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NXKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thoughratheryoungincomparisonwithsomeothers,______isthebiggestuniversityinEngland.
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
随机试题
系统性风险的程度通常用______系数来表示。
颊侧物体投影规则,能解决普通根尖片不能解决的问题是:()
认为“冲突是不可避免地存在于所有组织中,其性质不一定是坏的”观点是
国标规定,测定食品中总砷的方法——硼氢化物还原比色法,为了将五价砷还原为三价砷,需使用
王某于2010年4月将自有住房出租给李某居住,年租金收入为5000元;2010年5月王某将该住房抵押给甲银行,并办理了抵押登记。2010年6月李某将房屋转租给张某使用,签订6个月的转租合同。下列关于王某已出租房屋抵押的说法中,正确的为()。
下列各项中,不属于投资中心考核指标的有()。
某儿童服务机构的社会工作者小梁接到一位居民的电话,反映其邻居家的12岁男孩小伟时常被父亲打骂。小梁通过入户访问、评估。决定为小伟一家提供服务。在预估与问题分析阶段,小梁首先要做的是()。
请谈谈你最近读的一本书。
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须保存在考生文件夹下。小李今年毕业后,在一家计算机图书销售公司担任市场部助理,主要的工作职责是为部门经理提供销售信息的分析和汇总。请你根
Itwasatthegate______hetoldmethenews.
最新回复
(
0
)