首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
admin
2015-10-21
55
问题
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished theorist of liberalism was indeed a brilliant talker and feline gossip. Readers of Berlin’s letters will find that same bubbling flow of malice, wit and human insight on the written page.
A first set of letters came out five years ago. To coincide with Berlin’s centenary year—he lived from 1909 to 1997—his literary executor, Henry Hardy, and a team of co-editors have now brought out a second fat volume. The verbal pressure is higher still, for in 1949 Berlin began dictating to a machine.
Biographically the letters take the reader through Berlin’s professional ascent from clever young don to Oxford professor, public educator and transatlantic academic star. They track the consolidation of his social position as an intellectual jewel of the post-war British establishment. Three or four footnotes a page introduce perhaps 1,000 or more politicians, public servants, academics, musicians and socialites whom Berlin knew or talked about. For that alone, his letters are a unique record of a bygone milieu.
Berlin did not write on oath. He ladles praise on correspondents only to dismiss them in letters to others as gorgons or third-raters. During the Suez crisis in 1956 he writes to the wife of the Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden, that her husband has shown "great moral splendour". The next letter, to Berlin’s stepson at Harvard, calls the British action "childish folly". His capsule judgments are sometimes apt, sometimes sneering. He calls Sir Peter Strawson, an eminent contemporary philosopher, provincial. Berlin is sharper still on his own thin-skinned self. He belittles his large philosophical gifts, finds publication an agony and worries to correspondents that his work is rot.
Mr. Hardy says that these letters represent perhaps a fourth of those Berlin wrote in 1946-1960. There are none back to him. So here is Berlin in his own ironical voice, as selected by editors. A reader only of these letters may well ask why Berlin had such grateful pupils and devoted friends. And why was he among the foremost liberal thinkers of the age? A selection of old and new tributes, The Book of Isaiah, also edited by the tireless Mr. Hardy, partly answers both questions.
Thinkers such as John Rawls defended liberal principles with more argument. Among historians of ideas, Quentin Skinner did more to professionalise their discipline. No one had Berlin’s gift for dramatising and personalising abstract ideas.
Berlin kept returning to three core convictions. Freedom from constraint by others(negative liberty)is more urgent or basic, he argued, than freedom to realise your potential(positive liberty). The left distrusted that distinction and the right misappropriated it, while philosophers continue to pick it over. He thought, secondly, that liberalism fails if it cannot validate the universal need to belong.
But perhaps Berlin’s strongest conviction was that the basic commitments—to friendship and truth, fairness and liberty, family and achievement, nation and principle—clash routinely and cannot be smoothly reconciled. Thinkers and politicians should admit the conflicts, Berlin implied, and not blanket them with doctrine or tyrannically attempt to subordinate some concerns to others.
The first two of those ideas crop up here and there in these letters. In personal form, that third conviction—that people are to be taken in full, not in formulae—runs throughout, and was surely one source of Berlin’s charm. More volumes of letters are to follow. Readers will wonder what self-mocking Berlin would have made of this growing monument. He was an erudite wit at the dinner table and, as the reader now sees, in his letters. But he was a thinker first, and for his thought there is no substitute for his essays.
The last paragraph implies that Berlin’s letters______.
选项
A、present a different image of Berlin
B、reflect conflicts among Berlin’s three convictions
C、are not the best source to learn Berlin’s thought
D、reveal flaws in Berlin’s philosophical theory
答案
C
解析
推断题。该段最后一句开头的“but”表示语义的转折,并强调伯林的首要角色是思想家,要研究学习他的思想,最好的依据是他的论文,他的书信是无法替代这一作用的,故[C]为正确答案。文章第一段表明伯林的信中体现了他的恶念、智趣与人性洞察力,但并未强调信件揭示出伯林形象的另一面,故排除[A];文中也未提及伯林的三个核心信念之间的矛盾,或者他的哲学学说中存在什么缺陷,故排除[B]和[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NXKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
StudentsinAustraliabetweentheagesof6and15canenjoy______education.
ThemoststrikingphoneticdifferencebetweenAmericanandBritishEnglishisthepronunciationof______inwords.
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
ThetraditionaldividinglineinAmericabetween"east"and"west"is______.
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
随机试题
充分必要条件假言判断的命题形式是:()。
TMD患者矫治中应注意的问题有
产褥妇,26岁。剖宫产术后16天,突然阴道大量流血3小时来院。入院时BP84/60mmHg,心率122次/分,Hb84g/L。该患者最可能的出血原因是()
李某、阮某持某外国护照,涉嫌贩卖毒品罪被检察机关起诉至某市中级法院。如李某、阮某被判处刑罚同时附加判处罚金,下列说法正确的是:(2011年卷二96题,不定项)
监理单位对总监理工程师和专业监理工程师的工作进行考核的主要依据就是经监理单位主管负责人审批的()。
湖南是华夏文明的重要发祥地之一,其中,出土于宁乡黄材镇的(),是目前世界上发现的最精美的商代青铜器,也是中国现存最大的商代青铜方尊。
甲乙两车相向而行,若甲先行3小时20分,则两车8小时后相遇;若乙先行2小时30分,则两车9小时后相遇。问若甲乙两车都将速度提升25%,同时出发,几小时后相遇?
汉族民歌的体裁一般按演唱场合的不同可以分为三大类:号子、山歌和()
《刑法》第110条规定:“有下列间谍行为之一,危害国家安全的,处十年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑;情节较轻的,处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑:(一)参加间谍组织或者接受间谍组织及其代理人的任务的;(二)为敌人指示轰击目标的。”试分析该法条的法律规定。
Inordertoearnmoneyforhisfamily,itisnecessaryforhimtogetajob.
最新回复
(
0
)