首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2012-10-23
65
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscente. The deadly dive of university critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, and difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate. That cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so encrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the fatuous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark", her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition". For him, the postmodern turn to, theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow liter-ary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books—is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
What does "the snark review" refer to according to Heidi Julavits?
选项
A、Cultural reviews which are unfriendly and selfless
B、Literary reviews avoiding serious criticism
C、Entertainment reviews in the film industry
D、Postmodern reviews independent of objectivity
答案
A
解析
细节题。本题的解题点在文章的第四段最后一句“She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced“snark”,her term for hostile,self-serving reviews.”此句中的She指的就是Heidi Julavits,此句中的hostile、self-serving与A选项中的“unfriendly”、“selfless”的意思正好相对应,所以正确答案是A选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Nb9O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Cowriesshellswereonceinwidespreaduseasatokenofvalue.
Thelaserrepresentsatruemarriagebetweenscienceandtechnology,themenwhodeviseditwere______engineersandphysicists
Letus______confidentlyintothenewMillenniumandembracethechallengesandopportunitiesitwillofferusandgenerations
Britain’sleadingswimmersarefacingatestoftheir______aswellastheirskillsattheOlympictrialsinSheffield.
ProfessorSmithandProfessorBrownwill______inpresentingtheseriesoflecturesonAmericanliterature.
Althoughcriticsdenouncedthefilmassillyandinane,peopleflockedtothetheatertoseeit,guaranteeingitssuccess.
PeterPalumbo,chairmanoftheArtsCouncil,saidthenationalcompaniesweresosuccessfulcommerciallythatwhentherewasas
Signsofdeafnesshadgivenhimgreatanxietyasearlyas1798.Foralongtimehesuccessfullyconcealeditfromallbuthismo
随机试题
颈膨大的白质前连合损伤,可导致()
芥子炒黄可以
患者,女性,38岁。反复上腹痛伴反酸10余年,多于夜间或饥饿时发生。近1周来上腹痛伴呕吐,呕吐量有时较大,呕吐物带有发酵味。查体:上腹部压痛。有振水音。上述患者最可能的诊断是
以下所列的“全球药师追求的目标”中,最正确的是
Ioncehadafriendthatwasdiagnosedwithterminalcancer,andthenewsthathemightonlyliveuptosixmonthswasagreats
凯恩斯是如何解释资本主义经济的有效需求不足的?他所引申出的政策结论是什么?
人在社会化过程中,人的社会动机、态度、社会行为的发生的基础是()
第二次世界大战期间,海洋上航行的商船常常遭到德国轰炸机的袭击,许多商船都先后在船上架设了高射炮。但是,商船在海上摇晃得比较厉害,用高射炮射击天上的飞机是很难命中的。战争结束后,研究人员发现,从整个战争期间架设过高射炮的商船的统计资料看,击落敌机的命中率只有
下列有关法人民事行为能力的判断,正确的是( )。
求(x>1)
最新回复
(
0
)