首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Divorce and out-of-wedlock childbirth are transforming the lives of American children. In the postwar generation more than 80 pe
Divorce and out-of-wedlock childbirth are transforming the lives of American children. In the postwar generation more than 80 pe
admin
2010-07-19
54
问题
Divorce and out-of-wedlock childbirth are transforming the lives of American children. In the postwar generation more than 80 percent of children grew up in family with two biological parents who were married to each other. By 1980 only 50 percent could expect to spend their entire childhood in an intact family. If current minds continue, less than haft of all children born today will live continuously with their own mother and father throughout childhood. Most American children will spend several years in a single mother family. Some will eventually live in step-parent families, but because step-families are more likely to break up than intact (by which I mean two-biological parent) families, an increasing number of children will experience family breakup two or even three times during childhood.
According to a growing body of social-scientific evidence, children in families disrupted by divorce and out-of wedlock birth do worse than children in intact families on several measures of well-being. Children in single-parent families are six times as likely to be poor. They are also likely to stay poor longer. Twenty-two percent of children in one parent families will experience poverty during childhood for seven years or more, as compared with only two percent (children in two-parent families. A 1988 survey by the National Center for Health Statistics found that children in single-parent families are two to three times as likely as children in two-parent families to have emotional and behavioral problems. They are also more likely drop out of high school, to get pregnant as teenagers, to abuse drugs, and to be in trouble with the law. Compared with children in intact families, children from disrupted families are at a much higher risk for physical or sexual abuse.
Contrary to popular belief, many children do not "bounce back" after divorce or remarriage. Difficulties that are associated with family breakup often persist into adulthood. Children who grow up in single-parent or step-parent families are less successful as adults, particularly in file two domains of life—love and work—that are most essential to happiness. Needless to say, not all children experience such negative effects. However, research shows that many children from disrupted families have a harder time achieving intimacy in a relationship, forming a stable marriage, or even holding a steady job.
Despite this growing body of evidence, it is nearly impossible to discuses in family structure without giving rise to angry protest. Many people see the discussion as no more than an attack on struggling single mothers and their children: Why blame single mothers when they are doing the very best they can? After all, few parent are indifferent to the painful burden their decision to end a marriage or a relationship imposes on their children. Many take the hazardous step toward single parenthood, as a last resort, after their best efforts to hold a marriage together have failed. Consequently, it can seen particularly cruel and unfeeling to remind parents of the hardships their children might suffer as a result of family breakup. Other people believe that the dramatic changes in family structure, though regrettable, are impossible to reverse. Family breakup is an inevitable feature of American life, and anyone who thinks otherwise is yielding to nostalgia or trying to turn back to the clock. Since these new family forms are here to stay, the reasoning goes, we must give respect to single parents, not criticize them. Typical is the view expressed by a Brooklyn woman in a recent letter to The New York Times: "Let’s stop moralizing or blaming single parents and unwed mothers, and give them the respect they have earned and the support they deserve."
Such views are not to be dismissed. Indeed, they help W explain why family structure is such an explosive issue for Americans. The debate about it is not simply about the social-scientific evidence, although that is surely an important part of the discussion. It is also a debate over deeply held and often conflicting values. How do we begin to reconcile our long-standing belief in equality and diversity with m impressive body of evidence that suggests that not all family structures produce outcomes for children? How can we square traditional ideas of public support for dependent women and children with a belief in women’s right to pursue freedom and independence in child-bearing and child-rearing? How do we support the freedom of adults to pursue individual happiness in their private relationships and at the same respond to the needs of children for stability, security, and permanence in their family lives? What do we do when the interests of adults and children conflict? These are difficult issues at stake in the debate over family structure.
If we fail to come to m with the relationship between family structure and child wellbeing, then it win be increasingly difficult to improve children’s life prospects, no matter how many new programs the federal government funds. Nor will we be able to make progress in bettering school performance or reducing crime or improving the quality of the nation’s future work force—all domestic problems closely connected to family breakup. Worse, we may contribute to the problem by pursuing policies that actually increase family instability and breakup. (867 words)
It can be inferred from the author’s view that ______.
选项
A、correct policies should be based on a deep insight into the relationship between family structure and declining child well-being
B、the break-up of the family is bad but the situation cannot be changed
C、the funding of new programs by the government may help improve overall child well-being
D、it is best to stop criticizing unwed mothers and give them respect
答案
A
解析
第一段中,作者认为现实中政府的政策实际上是刺激了家庭的不稳定性,甚至导致家庭破裂。由此可见,作者的观点是:正确的政策应是以稳定家庭结构和保证孩子的健康成长为基础的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NklO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleholdtheviewthatastudent’ssuccessinuniversitystudyfollowsthepatternasthatoffarming,whichischaracte
1 Howiscommunicationactuallyachieved?Itdepends,ofcourse,eitheronacommonlanguageoronknownconventions,oratlea
目前美国的所谓“人文教育”(liberalartseducation)的理念,在中国颇有些鼓吹者。但“人文教育”后面还有体育这一层。体育是学习人生的最好手段。体育和人生的关系,如同数学和科学的关系一样。因为体育能够把人生中千变万化的现象,抽象为几个最简
IftheFederationofAmericanScientistsmadealistofeducationalvideogames,youmightexpecttofindOregonTrai,theStory
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamess【M1】_____bas
WhichofthefollowingisNOTanationaldailynewspaperinBritain?
Justafewweeksago,economistsandmarketanalystswereexpectingtheFederalReservetocutshortterminterestratesonefin
Justafewweeksago,economistsandmarketanalystswereexpectingtheFederalReservetocutshortterminterestratesonefin
InBritain,thetopspectatorsportisfootball.Thissportwasseriously【1】_____asanorganizedgamein1848Later,theFoo
DidMarcoPoloTelltheTruth?ThereisacontroversyaboutMarcoPolo’striptoChina.DidMarcoPolotellthetruth?Ifyo
随机试题
具有理气,调中,燥湿,化痰功效的药物是
A.痿证B.痉证C.痹证D.厥证E.痫证以肢体筋脉迟缓,软弱无力,日久因不能随意运动而致肌肉萎缩为主要表现的病证是()
案情:甲(男23岁),乙(女19岁),为达到结婚目的,乙篡改了户口本并制作了假身份证,于民政部门领取了结婚证。结婚前甲的父母为甲购买了一套住房,供甲乙婚后居住,婚后乙的父母为乙买了一套住房供甲乙居住。三年后甲与乙的感情不和,乙要离婚甲不同意,于是乙诉至法院
某天16:10,某厂维修班开始检修连接污油池的输油管线,16:20钳工甲将带有底阀的输油管线放入污油池内,当时污油池内油的液面高度为50cm,上面浮有30cm厚的污油,在连接100cm高的法兰时,由于法兰无法对正而连接不上,班长乙去车间喊电焊工丙,17:1
申请人不服人民法院驳回破产申请裁定的,有权向上一级人民法院提起上诉,上诉期限为( )。
科学:逻辑
关于法律移植,以下说法错误的是()
我们党新世纪新阶段解决“三农”问题的重大战略部署和新的基本途径是
【B1】【B14】
A、Impolitebuthelpful.B、Kindandflexible.C、Politeanddisciplined.D、Flexibleandhelpful.C综合理解题。男士要求女士免费为他维修录音机,并认为十天的时间无关
最新回复
(
0
)